Literature DB >> 31104070

Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis.

Christopher W Seymour1,2,3, Jason N Kennedy1,3, Shu Wang4, Chung-Chou H Chang3,4,5, Corrine F Elliott6, Zhongying Xu4, Scott Berry6, Gilles Clermont1,3, Gregory Cooper7, Hernando Gomez1,2,3, David T Huang1,2,3, John A Kellum1,3, Qi Mi8, Steven M Opal9, Victor Talisa4, Tom van der Poll10, Shyam Visweswaran7, Yoram Vodovotz11, Jeremy C Weiss12, Donald M Yealy2, Sachin Yende1,3,13, Derek C Angus1,3,5.   

Abstract

Importance: Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome. Identification of distinct clinical phenotypes may allow more precise therapy and improve care. Objective: To derive sepsis phenotypes from clinical data, determine their reproducibility and correlation with host-response biomarkers and clinical outcomes, and assess the potential causal relationship with results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Design, Settings, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of data sets using statistical, machine learning, and simulation tools. Phenotypes were derived among 20 189 total patients (16 552 unique patients) who met Sepsis-3 criteria within 6 hours of hospital presentation at 12 Pennsylvania hospitals (2010-2012) using consensus k means clustering applied to 29 variables. Reproducibility and correlation with biological parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed in a second database (2013-2014; n = 43 086 total patients and n = 31 160 unique patients), in a prospective cohort study of sepsis due to pneumonia (n = 583), and in 3 sepsis RCTs (n = 4737). Exposures: All clinical and laboratory variables in the electronic health record. Main Outcomes and Measures: Derived phenotype (α, β, γ, and δ) frequency, host-response biomarkers, 28-day and 365-day mortality, and RCT simulation outputs.
Results: The derivation cohort included 20 189 patients with sepsis (mean age, 64 [SD, 17] years; 10 022 [50%] male; mean maximum 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score, 3.9 [SD, 2.4]). The validation cohort included 43 086 patients (mean age, 67 [SD, 17] years; 21 993 [51%] male; mean maximum 24-hour SOFA score, 3.6 [SD, 2.0]). Of the 4 derived phenotypes, the α phenotype was the most common (n = 6625; 33%) and included patients with the lowest administration of a vasopressor; in the β phenotype (n = 5512; 27%), patients were older and had more chronic illness and renal dysfunction; in the γ phenotype (n = 5385; 27%), patients had more inflammation and pulmonary dysfunction; and in the δ phenotype (n = 2667; 13%), patients had more liver dysfunction and septic shock. Phenotype distributions were similar in the validation cohort. There were consistent differences in biomarker patterns by phenotype. In the derivation cohort, cumulative 28-day mortality was 287 deaths of 5691 unique patients (5%) for the α phenotype; 561 of 4420 (13%) for the β phenotype; 1031 of 4318 (24%) for the γ phenotype; and 897 of 2223 (40%) for the δ phenotype. Across all cohorts and trials, 28-day and 365-day mortality were highest among the δ phenotype vs the other 3 phenotypes (P < .001). In simulation models, the proportion of RCTs reporting benefit, harm, or no effect changed considerably (eg, varying the phenotype frequencies within an RCT of early goal-directed therapy changed the results from >33% chance of benefit to >60% chance of harm). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of data sets from patients with sepsis, 4 clinical phenotypes were identified that correlated with host-response patterns and clinical outcomes, and simulations suggested these phenotypes may help in understanding heterogeneity of treatment effects. Further research is needed to determine the utility of these phenotypes in clinical care and for informing trial design and interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31104070      PMCID: PMC6537818          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.5791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

1.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research--part 2: multiple imputation.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Tom van der Poll
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Unsupervised Analysis of Transcriptomics in Bacterial Sepsis Across Multiple Datasets Reveals Three Robust Clusters.

Authors:  Timothy E Sweeney; Tej D Azad; Michele Donato; Winston A Haynes; Thanneer M Perumal; Ricardo Henao; Jesús F Bermejo-Martin; Raquel Almansa; Eduardo Tamayo; Judith A Howrylak; Augustine Choi; Grant P Parnell; Benjamin Tang; Marshall Nichols; Christopher W Woods; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Stephen F Kingsmore; Larsson Omberg; Lara M Mangravite; Hector R Wong; Ephraim L Tsalik; Raymond J Langley; Purvesh Khatri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking.

Authors:  Matthew D Wilkerson; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study.

Authors:  John A Kellum; Lan Kong; Mitchell P Fink; Lisa A Weissfeld; Donald M Yealy; Michael R Pinsky; Jonathan Fine; Alexander Krichevsky; Russell L Delude; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007 Aug 13-27

8.  Simplified severe sepsis protocol: a randomized controlled trial of modified early goal-directed therapy in Zambia.

Authors:  Ben Andrews; Levy Muchemwa; Paul Kelly; Shabir Lakhi; Douglas C Heimburger; Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven M Opal; Pierre-Francois Laterre; Bruno Francois; Steven P LaRosa; Derek C Angus; Jean-Paul Mira; Xavier Wittebole; Thierry Dugernier; Dominique Perrotin; Mark Tidswell; Luis Jauregui; Kenneth Krell; Jan Pachl; Takeshi Takahashi; Claus Peckelsen; Edward Cordasco; Chia-Sheng Chang; Sandra Oeyen; Naoki Aikawa; Tatsuya Maruyama; Roland Schein; Andre C Kalil; Marc Van Nuffelen; Melvyn Lynn; Daniel P Rossignol; Jogadish Gogate; Mary B Roberts; Janice L Wheeler; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Genomic landscape of the individual host response and outcomes in sepsis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emma E Davenport; Katie L Burnham; Jayachandran Radhakrishnan; Peter Humburg; Paula Hutton; Tara C Mills; Anna Rautanen; Anthony C Gordon; Christopher Garrard; Adrian V S Hill; Charles J Hinds; Julian C Knight
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 102.642

View more
  229 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence in intensive care: are we there yet?

Authors:  Matthieu Komorowski
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Clinical management of sepsis can be improved by artificial intelligence: yes.

Authors:  Matthieu Komorowski
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Hypersphere clustering to characterize healthcare providers using prescriptions and procedures from Medicare claims data.

Authors:  Nathanael Fillmore; Sergey D Goryachev; Jeremy C Weiss
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

4.  Harnessing Machine Learning to Improve Patient Outcomes in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Anne R Levenson; Luisa Morales-Nebreda; Michael J Alexander; Clara J Schroedl
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Sepsis Induces Prolonged Epigenetic Modifications in Bone Marrow and Peripheral Macrophages Impairing Inflammation and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Frank M Davis; Matthew A Schaller; Aaron Dendekker; Amrita D Joshi; Andrew S Kimball; Holly Evanoff; Carol Wilke; Andrea T Obi; William J Melvin; Karen Cavassani; Melissa Scola; Beau Carson; Stephanie Moser; Victoria Blanc; Milo Engoren; Bethany B Moore; Steven L Kunkel; Katherine A Gallagher
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Capillary refill time status could identify different clinical phenotypes among septic shock patients fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria: a post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial.

Authors:  Glenn Hernández; Eduardo Kattan; Gustavo Ospina-Tascón; Jan Bakker; Ricardo Castro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Patient selection in sepsis: precision medicine using phenotypes and its implications for future clinical trial design.

Authors:  Daisuke Hasegawa; Osamu Nishida
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Time to Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Comparative Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Authors:  Priya A Prasad; Margaret C Fang; Yumiko Abe-Jones; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Kirsten N Kangelaris
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Host-Response Subphenotypes Offer Prognostic Enrichment in Patients With or at Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Libing Yang; Dimitris V Manatakis; Mehdi Nouraie; John Evankovich; William Bain; Daniel G Dunlap; Faraaz Shah; Ian J Barbash; Sarah F Rapport; Yingze Zhang; Rebecca S DeSensi; Nathaniel M Weathington; Bill B Chen; Prabir Ray; Rama K Mallampalli; Panayiotis V Benos; Janet S Lee; Alison Morris; Bryan J McVerry
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Three Data-Driven Phenotypes of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Preserved from Early Childhood to Middle Adulthood.

Authors:  Jiancheng Ye; L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.