Literature DB >> 25719670

Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning.

Volodymyr Mnih1, Koray Kavukcuoglu1, David Silver1, Andrei A Rusu1, Joel Veness1, Marc G Bellemare1, Alex Graves1, Martin Riedmiller1, Andreas K Fidjeland1, Georg Ostrovski1, Stig Petersen1, Charles Beattie1, Amir Sadik1, Ioannis Antonoglou1, Helen King1, Dharshan Kumaran1, Daan Wierstra1, Shane Legg1, Demis Hassabis1.   

Abstract

The theory of reinforcement learning provides a normative account, deeply rooted in psychological and neuroscientific perspectives on animal behaviour, of how agents may optimize their control of an environment. To use reinforcement learning successfully in situations approaching real-world complexity, however, agents are confronted with a difficult task: they must derive efficient representations of the environment from high-dimensional sensory inputs, and use these to generalize past experience to new situations. Remarkably, humans and other animals seem to solve this problem through a harmonious combination of reinforcement learning and hierarchical sensory processing systems, the former evidenced by a wealth of neural data revealing notable parallels between the phasic signals emitted by dopaminergic neurons and temporal difference reinforcement learning algorithms. While reinforcement learning agents have achieved some successes in a variety of domains, their applicability has previously been limited to domains in which useful features can be handcrafted, or to domains with fully observed, low-dimensional state spaces. Here we use recent advances in training deep neural networks to develop a novel artificial agent, termed a deep Q-network, that can learn successful policies directly from high-dimensional sensory inputs using end-to-end reinforcement learning. We tested this agent on the challenging domain of classic Atari 2600 games. We demonstrate that the deep Q-network agent, receiving only the pixels and the game score as inputs, was able to surpass the performance of all previous algorithms and achieve a level comparable to that of a professional human games tester across a set of 49 games, using the same algorithm, network architecture and hyperparameters. This work bridges the divide between high-dimensional sensory inputs and actions, resulting in the first artificial agent that is capable of learning to excel at a diverse array of challenging tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25719670     DOI: 10.1038/nature14236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  9 in total

1.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks.

Authors:  G E Hinton; R R Salakhutdinov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.

Authors:  James L McClelland; Bruce L McNaughton; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Neocognitron: a self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position.

Authors:  K Fukushima
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 7.  Play it again: reactivation of waking experience and memory.

Authors:  Joseph O'Neill; Barty Pleydell-Bouverie; David Dupret; Jozsef Csicsvari
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Biasing the content of hippocampal replay during sleep.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Reinforcement learning can account for associative and perceptual learning on a visual-decision task.

Authors:  Chi-Tat Law; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 24.884

  9 in total
  515 in total

1.  Google AI algorithm masters ancient game of Go.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gibney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Atrial Fibrillation Burden Signature and Near-Term Prediction of Stroke: A Machine Learning Analysis.

Authors:  Lichy Han; Mariam Askari; Russ B Altman; Susan K Schmitt; Jun Fan; Jason P Bentley; Sanjiv M Narayan; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  Deep reinforcement learning of cell movement in the early stage of C.elegans embryogenesis.

Authors:  Zi Wang; Dali Wang; Chengcheng Li; Yichi Xu; Husheng Li; Zhirong Bao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Learning task-state representations.

Authors:  Yael Niv
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Reinforcement learning improves behaviour from evaluative feedback.

Authors:  Michael L Littman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Reinventing polysomnography in the age of precision medicine.

Authors:  Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 11.609

Review 8.  Machine learning in chemoinformatics and drug discovery.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Lo; Stefano E Rensi; Wen Torng; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes on Medical Registry Data.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Brent Logan; Ning Liu; Zhiyuan Xu; Jian Tang; Yanzhi Wang
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  2017-08

10.  Is Deep Reinforcement Learning Ready for Practical Applications in Healthcare? A Sensitivity Analysis of Duel-DDQN for Hemodynamic Management in Sepsis Patients.

Authors:  MingYu Lu; Zachary Shahn; Daby Sow; Finale Doshi-Velez; Li-Wei H Lehman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.