Literature DB >> 8045436

Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity.

O Katsumi1, M C Mehta, E W Larson-Park, C J Skladzien, T Hirose.   

Abstract

Because the pattern-reversal visual evoked response (PVER) reflects the central retinal function, PVER results generally agree with those of psychophysical tests. The visual acuities (VAs) calculated from PVER recordings and Snellen acuity (SA) measurements were compared in 500 eyes (261 patients; ages 8 to 88 years; mean, 44.5 years). The best-corrected VA was measured using the ETDRS chart, and the PVER acuity was determined by the smallest check size that produced a definite PVER (critical check size). In 288 eyes with a critical check size of 10 min of arc, the SAs ranged from 20/15 to 20/800 (mean 20/38). In 68 eyes with a critical check size of 20 min, the SAs ranged from 20/15 to 20/800 (mean 20/97). In 70 eyes with a critical check size of 40 min, the SAs ranged from 20/20 to 20/1600 (mean 20/156). In 29 eyes with a critical check size of 80 min and 14 eyes with a critical check size of 160 min, the SAs ranged from 20/50 to 20/1600 (mean 20/312 and 20/398, respectively). In 31 eyes in which the PVER was non-recordable, the SAs ranged from 20/70 to 20/3200 (mean 20/1177). The PVER acuity using the smallest check size seemed to agree with the SA, but large deviations were observed in certain subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8045436     DOI: 10.1007/bf00194476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  21 in total

1.  Relations between visual acuity, refraction and the pattern reversal visual-evoked cortical potential in aphakia.

Authors:  W Müller; H Schöneich
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Miniature fiber-optic pattern-reversal stimulator for determination of the visual evoked potential threshold; comparison with Snellen acuity.

Authors:  Y Raniel; H Pratt; E Neumann; S E Schacham
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Clinical analysis of non-recordable pattern VECPs in 107 patients.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; N Kuroda; Y Yamamoto
Journal:  Fortschr Ophthalmol       Date:  1988

4.  Retinal visual acuity with pattern VEP normal subjects and reproducibility.

Authors:  F Simon; B Rassow
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Theoretical reliability of visual evoked response-based acuity determinations.

Authors:  J E Fagan; R L Yolton
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-02

6.  An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

Authors:  T C Jenkins; W A Douthwaite
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-12

7.  Comparison of acuity tests and pattern evoked potential criteria: two mechanisms underly acuity maturation in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Comparison of Snellen acuity, VER acuity, and Arden grating scores in macular and optic nerve diseases.

Authors:  H W Skalka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Assessment of visual disability using visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Jihoon Jeon; Seiyul Oh; Sungeun Kyung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.