Literature DB >> 32231258

The business case for quality improvement.

Hannah Ryan Fischer1, Scott Davis Duncan2.   

Abstract

Value in healthcare can be defined as providing the optimal outcome per health dollar spent. Improving the value of healthcare for patients and healthcare organizations requires an understanding and evaluation of the costs and benefits. Investing in quality improvement (QI) work can bring about financial results for healthcare organizations over time, have beneficial organizational effects, and improve outcomes for patients. This article continues a series of QI educational papers in the Journal of Perinatology, and reviews financial and economic measures used to create the business case for QI. Ultimately, the business case for QI is better defined as a business strategy for success.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32231258     DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-0660-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  29 in total

1.  Value for money of changing healthcare services? Economic evaluation of quality improvement.

Authors:  J L Severens
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

2.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system.

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections in North Carolina NICUs.

Authors:  David Fisher; Keith M Cochran; Lloyd P Provost; Jacquelyn Patterson; Tara Bristol; Karen Metzguer; Brian Smith; Daniela Testoni; Martin J McCaffrey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Quality improvement methods - Part II.

Authors:  Katherine Coughlin; Michael A Posencheg
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Roadmap to a successful quality improvement project.

Authors:  J R Swanson; S A Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 7.  Introduction to quality improvement tools for the clinician.

Authors:  Alan Peter Picarillo
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Breast milk bar code scanning results in time savings and staff efficiency.

Authors:  Caroline Steele; Amanda Czerwin; Christine Bixby
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  Identifying a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Lakshmi Katakam; Gautham K Suresh
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  The cost-effectiveness of quality improvement projects: a conceptual framework, checklist and online tool for considering the costs and consequences of implementation-based quality improvement.

Authors:  Carl Thompson; Ryan Pulleyblank; Steve Parrott; Holly Essex
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.431

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Advancements in neonatology through quality improvement.

Authors:  Stephen A Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.

Authors:  S'thembile Thusini; Maria Milenova; Noushig Nahabedian; Barbara Grey; Tayana Soukup; Claire Henderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.908

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.