Literature DB >> 14532369

Value for money of changing healthcare services? Economic evaluation of quality improvement.

J L Severens1.   

Abstract

There are many instances of perceived or real inefficiencies in health service delivery. Both healthcare providers and policy makers need to know the impact and cost of applying strategies to change the behaviour of individuals or organisations. Quality improvement or implementation research is concerned with evaluating the methods of behavioural change. Addressing inefficiencies in healthcare services raises a series of issues, beginning with how inefficiency itself should be defined. The basic concepts of cost analysis and economic evaluations are explained and a model for working through the economic issues of quality improvement is discussed. This model combines the costs and benefits of corrected inefficiency with the costs and degree of behavioural change achieved by a quality improvement method in the policy maker's locality. It shows why it may not always be cost effective for policy makers to address suboptimal behaviour. Both the interpretation of quality improvement research findings and their local application need careful consideration. The limited availability of applicable quality improvement research may make it difficult to provide robust advice on the value for money of many behavioural quality improvement strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14532369      PMCID: PMC1743758          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  15 in total

1.  A randomized trial of Evidence-based OutReach (EBOR): rationale and design.

Authors:  N Freemantle; M Eccles; J Wood; J Mason; I Nazareth; C Duggan; P Young; A Haines; M Drummond; I Russell; T Walley
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-10

2.  Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  M Sculpher
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 3.  Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare. Matching the art to the science.

Authors:  E McIntosh; C Donaldson; M Ryan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals?

Authors:  J Mason; N Freemantle; I Nazareth; M Eccles; A Haines; M Drummond
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making.

Authors:  J A Mauskopf; J E Paul; D M Grant; A Stergachis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Economic implications of non-compliance in health care.

Authors:  Irina Cleemput; Katrien Kesteloot
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E M Antman; J Lau; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Routine individual feedback on requests for diagnostic tests: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  R A Winkens; A J Ament; P Pop; P H Reniers; R P Grol; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Randomized controlled economic evaluation of asthma self-management in primary health care.

Authors:  Tjard R Schermer; Bart P Thoonen; Guido van den Boom; Reinier P Akkermans; Richard P Grol; Hans T Folgering; Chris van Weel; Constant P van Schayck
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Why is evaluation of the cost effectiveness of audit so difficult? The example of thrombolysis for suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M B Robinson; E Thompson; N A Black
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-03
View more
  17 in total

1.  The perceived financial impact of quality improvement efforts in community health centers.

Authors:  Karen Cheung; Adil Moiduddin; Marshall H Chin; Melinda L Drum; Sydney E S Brown; Jessica E Graber; Loretta Heuer; Michael T Quinn; Cynthia T Schaefer; Amy E Schlotthauer; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

2.  The business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Hannah Ryan Fischer; Scott Davis Duncan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Viewpoint: Economic evaluation of package of care interventions employing clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Edwine W Barasa; Mike English
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Emergent Challenges in Determining Costs for Economic Evaluations.

Authors:  Josephine C Jacobs; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Does a joint development and dissemination of multidisciplinary guidelines improve prescribing behaviour: a pre/post study with concurrent control group and a randomised trial.

Authors:  Jody D Martens; Ron A G Winkens; Trudy van der Weijden; Daisy de Bruyn; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Sustainability of healthcare innovations (SUSHI): long term effects of two implemented surgical care programmes (protocol).

Authors:  Stephanie M C Ament; Freek Gillissen; José M C Maessen; Carmen D Dirksen; Trudy van der Weijden; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Introduction of a breast cancer care programme including ultra short hospital stay in 4 early adopter centres: framework for an implementation study.

Authors:  Mascha de Kok; Caroline N A Frotscher; Trudy van der Weijden; Alfons G H Kessels; Carmen D Dirksen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Jan A Roukema; Antoine V R J Bell; Fred W van der Ent; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Nurse-led motivational interviewing to change the lifestyle of patients with type 2 diabetes (MILD-project): protocol for a cluster, randomized, controlled trial on implementing lifestyle recommendations.

Authors:  Renate Jansink; Jozé Braspenning; Trudy van der Weijden; Louis Niessen; Glyn Elwyn; Richard Grol
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis.

Authors:  Korine Scheeres; Michel Wensing; Gijs Bleijenberg; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Improving management of patients with acute cough by C-reactive protein point of care testing and communication training (IMPAC3T): study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jochen W L Cals; Rogier M Hopstaken; Christopher C Butler; Kerenza Hood; Johan L Severens; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.