Literature DB >> 35368024

Advancements in neonatology through quality improvement.

Stephen A Pearlman1,2.   

Abstract

In the past 3 decades, quality improvement methodology has often been employed in medicine to improve patient outcomes. Neonatal medicine has seen an increase in publications using improvement science to ensure the application of potentially better practices to decrease complications and increase survival without major disability. This article reviews quality improvement studies that have impacted neonatal mortality and morbidity, as well as specific disease processes including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy of prematurity. Using improvement science, studies have substantially reduced neonatal mortality and the major complications of preterm birth.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35368024     DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01383-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   3.225


  42 in total

Review 1.  Iatrogenic complications in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  K C Sekar
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  A statewide quality improvement collaborative to reduce neonatal central line-associated blood stream infections.

Authors:  D D Wirtschafter; J Pettit; P Kurtin; M Dalsey; K Chance; H W Morrow; M Seid; T L Byczkowski; T P Huber; J M Milstein; S M Bowles; S Fichera; S Kloman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Quality improvement methods - Part II.

Authors:  Katherine Coughlin; Michael A Posencheg
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Roadmap to a successful quality improvement project.

Authors:  J R Swanson; S A Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 5.  Introduction to quality improvement tools for the clinician.

Authors:  Alan Peter Picarillo
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  The business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Hannah Ryan Fischer; Scott Davis Duncan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Measurement for quality improvement: using data to drive change.

Authors:  Munish Gupta; Heather C Kaplan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  A quality improvement initiative to reduce necrotizing enterocolitis across hospital systems.

Authors:  Amy T Nathan; Laura Ward; Kurt Schibler; Laurel Moyer; Andrew South; Heather C Kaplan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  A practical guide to publishing a quality improvement paper.

Authors:  Stephen A Pearlman; Jonathan R Swanson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants using quality-improvement methods.

Authors:  A L Patel; S Trivedi; N P Bhandari; A Ruf; C M Scala; G Witowitch; Y Chen; C Renschen; P P Meier; J M Silvestri
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.521

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nanotechnologies in Obstetrics and Cancer during Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Serena Bertozzi; Bruna Corradetti; Luca Seriau; José Andrés Diaz Ñañez; Carla Cedolini; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Daniela Cesselli; Angelo Cagnacci; Ambrogio P Londero
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.