| Literature DB >> 32224906 |
Ikuko Kashino1, Masafumi Eguchi2, Takako Miki1, Takeshi Kochi2, Akiko Nanri1,3, Isamu Kabe2, Tetsuya Mizoue1.
Abstract
Hypertension has become a major public health issue worldwide. Whole grains contain higher levels and a broader range of nutrients with potential health benefits and may decrease the risk of hypertension. However, no prospective studies have investigated this association in the high-income Asia Pacific region, which has the lowest whole grain intake worldwide. Thus, we examined the prospective association between whole grain consumption and the development of hypertension in Japan. Participants included 944 working Japanese adults aged 19-68 years who had no hypertension at baseline and completed a 3-year follow-up survey. Whole grain consumption was assessed via a self-administered dietary questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to examine the association between whole grain consumption and hypertension, adjusting for potential confounding factors, such as sociodemographic, lifestyle, dietary, and occupational characteristics. After 3 years, 9.4% (86 cases) of the study participants had developed hypertension. More frequent whole grain consumption, classified as an intake frequency of "sometimes or always", was associated with lower odds of hypertension (multivariate-adjusted odds ratio: 0.36; 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.83; p for trend = 0.04) compared with no consumption. Consuming more whole grains may decrease the risk of developing hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: Asians; Japan; blood pressure; cohort study; epidemiology; hypertension; whole grain
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32224906 PMCID: PMC7230178 DOI: 10.3390/nu12040902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart of the study population.
Baseline characteristics of the study population according to frequency of whole grain intake.
| Frequency of Whole Grain Intake | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never | Rarely | Sometimes or Always |
| |
| No. of participants | 530 | 221 | 193 | |
| Age, years (mean ± SD) | 39.7 ± 8.7 | 39.4 ± 8.8 | 40.9 ± 8.0 | 0.18 |
| Females, % | 10.6 | 11.3 | 15.0 | 0.12 |
| Work site (survey in April 2012), % | 56.0 | 52.9 | 44.6 | 0.01 |
| Smoking status (current), % | 34.9 | 28.1 | 21.8 | <0.001 |
| Physical activity during work, housework, or commuting to work (≥20 METs-hours/day), % | 28.3 | 19.5 | 12.4 | <0.001 |
| Leisure-time physical activity (≥10 METs-hours/week), % | 24.9 | 30.3 | 34.2 | 0.01 |
| Body mass index (mean ± SD), kg/m2 | 22.4 ± 2.8 | 23.0 ± 3.2 | 22.4 ± 2.6 | 0.02 |
| Night or rotating shift work (yes), % | 26.8 | 13.6 | 8.8 | <0.001 |
| Overtime work (≥30 hours/month), % | 24.5 | 26.2 | 26.9 | 0.47 |
| Alcohol consumption (current), % 2) | 52.5 | 47.1 | 53.9 | 0.97 |
| Dietary nutrient and food intake (mean ± SD) | ||||
| Total energy, kcal/day | 1753 ± 484 | 1854 ± 482 | 1781 ± 444 | 0.02 |
| Carbohydrate, % energy | 55.3 ± 8.1 | 55.3 ± 7.4 | 53.6 ± 7.8 | 0.03 |
| Fat, % energy | 23.7 ± 5.7 | 24.1 ± 4.8 | 25.1 ± 5.6 | 0.01 |
| Protein, % energy | 13.4 ± 2.6 | 13.9 ± 2.3 | 14.2 ± 2.2 | <0.001 |
| Sodium, mg/1000 kcal | 2300 ± 473 | 2322 ± 436 | 2282 ± 401 | 0.66 |
| Vegetables, g/1000 kcal | 108.5 ± 59.9 | 129.4 ± 69.4 | 138.4 ± 71.7 | <0.001 |
| Fruits, g/1000 kcal | 36.4 ± 44.1 | 48.4 ± 48.7 | 51.5 ± 52.2 | <0.001 |
| Pulses, g/1000 kcal | 24.2 ± 20.1 | 25.4 ± 17.5 | 29.7 ± 19.9 | 0.004 |
| Meats, g/1000 kcal | 39.9 ± 18.2 | 39.4 ± 18.5 | 38.8 ± 16.2 | 0.76 |
| Dairy, g/1000 kcal | 47.9 ± 51.8 | 48.1 ± 43.5 | 62.7 ± 53.0 | 0.002 |
| Soft drinks, g/1000 kcal | 52.1 ± 80.0 | 41.6 ± 51.0 | 32.2 ± 51.5 | 0.003 |
| Rice, g/1000 kcal | 186.3 ± 67.0 | 188.5 ± 60.3 | 172.8 ± 68.0 | 0.03 |
| Bread, g/1000 kcal | 22.5 ± 18.9 | 20.1 ± 15.0 | 22.0 ± 17.9 | 0.25 |
| Noodles, g/1000 kcal | 44.4 ± 31.5 | 43.6 ± 27.4 | 41.4 ± 26.8 | 0.49 |
Abbreviations: MET, metabolic equivalent. 1) Based on the Mantel–Haenszel test for categorical variables and linear regression analysis for continuous variables. 2) Alcohol consumption at least one day per week.
Prospective associations between whole grain intake and hypertension.
| Frequency of Whole Grain Intake | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never | Rarely | Sometimes or Always |
| ||||
| Participants ( | 530 | 221 | 193 | ||||
| Cases ( | 57 | 24 | 8 | ||||
| Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) | |||||||
| Model 12) | 1.00 | (Reference) | 1.04 | (0.62–1.75) | 0.35 | (0.16–0.77) | 0.02 |
| Model 23) | 1.00 | (Reference) | 1.02 | (0.57–1.83) | 0.36 | (0.16–0.83) | 0.04 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. 1) Linear trends across the whole grain intake categories were determined using each category as an ordinal variable. 2) Model 1 adjusted for age (year, continuous), sex, and site (survey in April 2012 or in May 2013). 3) Model 2 additionally adjusted for smoking (never smoked, former smoke, current smoker consuming <20 cigarettes/day, or current smoker consuming ≥20 cigarettes/day), alcohol consumption (nondrinker, drinker consuming 1–3 days/month, weekly drinker consuming <1, 1 to <2, or ≥2 serving/day; one serving contains 23 g of ethanol), physical activity at work and housework or in commuting to work (<3, 3 to <7, 7 to <20, or ≥20 MET-hour/day), leisure-time physical activity (not engaged, >0 to <3, 3 to <10, or ≥10 MET-hours/week), body mass index (kg/m2), night or rotating shift work (yes/no), overtime work (<10, 10 to <30, or ≥30 hours/month), total energy intake (kcal/day), and nutrient and food intake expressed as energy density (sodium, vegetables, fruits, pulses, meat, dairy, soft drinks, rice, bread, and noodles).