| Literature DB >> 32213847 |
Katarzyna Naparlo1, Grzegorz Bartosz2, Ireneusz Stefaniuk3, Bogumil Cieniek3, Miroslaw Soszynski4, Izabela Sadowska-Bartosz1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize the interaction of chosen catechins ((+)-catechin, (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC), and (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)) with human erythrocytes and their protective effects against oxidative damage of erythrocytes. Uptake of the catechins by erythrocytes was studied by fluorimetry, their interaction with erythrocyte membrane was probed by changes in erythrocyte osmotic fragility and in membrane fluidity evaluated with spin labels, while protection against oxidative damage was assessed by protection against hemolysis induced by permanganate and protection of erythrocyte membranes against lipid peroxidation and protein thiol group oxidation. Catechin uptake was similar for all the compounds studied. Accumulation of catechins in the erythrocyte membrane was demonstrated by the catechin-induced increase in osmotic resistance and rigidification of the erythrocyte membrane detected by spin labels 5-doxyl stearic acid and 16-doxyl stearic acid. (-)-Epigallocatechin and EGCG inhibited erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (mixed-type inhibition). Catechins protected erythrocytes against permanganate-induced hemolysis, oxidation of erythrocyte protein thiol groups, as well as membrane lipid peroxidation. These results contribute to the knowledge of the beneficial effects of catechins present in plant-derived food and beverages.Entities:
Keywords: (−)-epigallocatechin; (−)-epigallocatechin gallate; antioxidant; catechin; erythrocyte; hemolysis; membrane rigidity; monometric flavanols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32213847 PMCID: PMC7145294 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of monomeric flavanols used in this study.
Figure 2The double reciprocal plot of the uptake of selected flavanols by human erythrocytes. EGC, epigallocatechin; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate.
Effect of selected catechins on NaCl concentration causing 50% hemolysis (c50) of erythrocytes (mM). Mean ± SD, n = 3.
| Compound | c50 (mM) | c50 (mM) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 65.4 ± 0.4 | 65.2 ± 0.8 |
| C | 66.5 ± 0.5 * | 62.8 ± 0.8 * |
| Epigallocatechin (EGC | 67.0 ± 0.7 * | 63.5 ± 0.7 * |
| Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) | 66.1 ± 0.4 * | 62.7 ± 0.8 ** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Effect of catechins on the rotational correlation time (in nanoseconds) of 16-doxyl-stearic acid in erythrocyte membranes. Mean values ± SD, n ≥ 3.
| Compound | Rotational Correlation Time τc (ns) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (μM) | Catechin | EGC | EGCG |
| 0 | 1.73 ± 0.03 | ||
| 50 | 1.62 ± 0.08 | 1.78 ± 0.005 | 1.77 ± 0.10 |
| 100 | 1.73 ± 0.28 | 1.86 ± 0.03 ** | 1.83 ± 0.20 |
| 250 | 1.81 ± 0.15 | 1.99 ± 0.23 | 1.79 ± 0.01 * |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Effect of catechins on the order parameter of 5-doxyl stearic acid (5DS) and 16-doxyl-stearic acid (16DS) in erythrocyte membranes. Mean values ± SD, n ≥ 3.
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0.610 ± 0.006 | ||
| 50 | 0.616 ± 0.007 | 0.616 ± 0.007 | 0.616 ± 0.007 |
| 100 | 0.617 ± 0.012 | 0.617 ± 0.012 | 0.617 ± 0.012 |
| 250 | 0.618 ± 0.008 | 0.618 ± 0.008 | 0.618 ± 0.008 |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0.145 ± 0.001 | ||
| 50 | 0.150 ± 0.002 ** | 0.148 ± 0.003 | 0.147 ± 0.001 * |
| 100 | 0.152 ± 0.003 ** | 0.150 ± 0.004 * | 0.147 ± 0.002 |
| 250 | 0.153 ± 0.002 *** | 0.156 ± 0.010 * | 0.150 ± 0.002 ** |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Figure 3Lineweaver–Burk plot of erythrocyte membrane acetylcholinesterase activity in the absence and in the presence of 50 μM (−)-epigallocatechin (EGC) and 50 μM (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG).
Effect of EGCG on the kinetic parameters of erythrocyte membrane acetylcholinesterase. Mean values ± SD, n ≥ 3.
| Michaelis Constant Km (μM) | Maximal Velocity Vm (U/g Protein) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 118 ± 9 | 4.79 ± 0.34 |
| +50 μM EGC | 139 ± 16 | 3.66 ± 0.45 * |
| +50 μM EGCG | 151 ± 25 * | 2.41 ± 0. 28 ***♣♣ |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 with respect to catechin, ♣♣ p < 0.01 with respect to ECG.
Figure 4The exemplary curve of permanganate-induced hemolysis in the presence of various concentrations of catechin. E—erythrocytes; P—permanganate.
Figure 5Effect of monomeric flavanols on the relative hemolysis half-time of erythrocytes. Half-time of hemolysis of control samples assumed as 100%. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (with respect to control).
Figure 6Effect of monomeric flavanols on the hemolysis of erythrocytes estimated from the sum of turbidance values during 120-min measurements (every 2 min). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (with respect to control). Values for control samples were assumed as 100%.
Protection by monomeric flavanols against hypochlorite-induced oxidation of erythrocyte membrane protein thiol groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (with respect to control).
| Compound | Catechin | EGC | EGCG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 10.3 ± 1.1 * | 11.1 ± 1.9 * | 13.6 ± 1.2 * |
| 0.2 | 16.7 ± 3.4 * | 17.7 ± 2.1 * | 18.2 ± 2.0 * |
| 0.5 | 32.8 ± 3.8 * | 28.3 ± 3.4 * | 31.5 ± 8.6 * |
| 1 | 58.4 ± 13.5 ** | 44.6 ± 9.9 ** | 50.2 ± 5.7 * |
Protection by monomeric flavanols against hypochlorite-induced erythrocyte membrane lipid peroxidation. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (with respect to control).
| Compound | Catechin | EGC | EGCG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 19.0 ± 2.1 * | 16.8 ± 1.3 * | 24.8 ± 2.0 * |
| 0.2 | 36.1 ± 5.7 * | 27.7 ± 2.2 * | 41.1 ± 1.9 * |
| 0.5 | 44.7 ± 1.5 * | 37.4 ± 2.6 * | 46.8 ± 3.2 * |
| 1 | 60.6 ± 2.0 * | 59.7 ± 1.5 ** | 62.9 ± 3.3 ** |