Literature DB >> 34446570

Differential Effects of Cerebellar Degeneration on Feedforward versus Feedback Control across Speech and Reaching Movements.

Benjamin Parrell1,2, Hyosub E Kim3,4, Assaf Breska3, Arohi Saxena3, Richard Ivry3.   

Abstract

Errors that result from a mismatch between predicted movement outcomes and sensory afference are used to correct ongoing movements through feedback control and to adapt feedforward control of future movements. The cerebellum has been identified as a critical part of the neural circuit underlying implicit adaptation across a wide variety of movements (reaching, gait, eye movements, and speech). The contribution of this structure to feedback control is less well understood. Although it has recently been shown in the speech domain that individuals with cerebellar degeneration produce larger online corrections for sensory perturbations than control participants, similar behavior has not been observed in other motor domains. Currently, comparisons across domains are limited by different population samples and potential ceiling effects in existing tasks. To assess the relationship between changes in feedforward and feedback control associated with cerebellar degeneration across motor domains, we evaluated adaptive (feedforward) and compensatory (feedback) responses to sensory perturbations in reaching and speech production in human participants of both sexes with cerebellar degeneration and neurobiologically healthy controls. As expected, the cerebellar group demonstrated impaired adaptation in both reaching and speech. In contrast, the groups did not differ in their compensatory response in either domain. Moreover, compensatory and adaptive responses in the cerebellar group were not correlated within or across motor domains. These results point to a general impairment in feedforward control with spared feedback control in cerebellar degeneration. However, the magnitude of feedforward impairments and potential changes in feedback-based control manifest in a domain-specific manner across individuals.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cerebellum contributes to feedforward updating of movement in response to sensory errors, but its role in feedback control is less understood. Here, we tested individuals with cerebellar degeneration (CD), using sensory perturbations to assess adaptation of feedforward control and feedback gains during reaching and speech production tasks. The results confirmed that CD leads to reduced adaption in both domains. However, feedback gains were unaffected by CD in either domain. Interestingly, measures of feedforward and feedback control were not correlated across individuals within or across motor domains. Together, these results indicate a general impairment in feedforward control with spared feedback control in CD. However, the magnitude of feedforward impairments manifests in a domain-specific manner across individuals.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellum; feedback control; feedforward control; limb control; motor control; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34446570      PMCID: PMC8528499          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0739-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  46 in total

1.  Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation.

Authors:  Opher Donchin; Kasja Rabe; Jörn Diedrichsen; Níall Lally; Beate Schoch; Elke Ruth Gizewski; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults.

Authors:  H Lane; J W Webster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Predictive and reactive finger force control during catching in cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Katrin Rost; Dagmar Timmann; Helge Topka
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Influences of load characteristics on impaired control of grip forces in patients with cerebellar damage.

Authors:  B Brandauer; D Timmann; A Häusler; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Marcus Y M Quek; Calum B Prescott; John-Stuart Brittain; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-06

10.  Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  A single exposure to altered auditory feedback causes observable sensorimotor adaptation in speech.

Authors:  Lana Hantzsch; Benjamin Parrell; Caroline A Niziolek
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Understanding implicit sensorimotor adaptation as a process of proprioceptive re-alignment.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Hyosub Kim; Adrian M Haith; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.