Literature DB >> 32209514

Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear.

Vedat Topsakal1, Marco Matulic2, Masoud Zoka Assadi3, Griet Mertens1, Vincent Van Rompaey1, Paul Van de Heyning1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The ideal outcome of cochlear implant surgery involves the insertion of the array inside the scala tympani of the cochlea with the least mechanical trauma. Recently, round window insertion and the direction in which the cochlea is approached have gained attention in this respect. The Angles of Cochlear Approach (ACA) can be defined with a plane in the plane of the basal turn, termed the in-plane angle, and the plane orthogonal to this plane, termed the out-plane angle. The aim of this study was to compare the trajectory angles for different surgical techniques of Veria, suprameatal, pericanal, and multiple posterior tympanotomy (PT) approaches, including an optimal trajectory that is simulated for robotic surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trajectories of these surgical techniques were simulated on the same high-resolution computed tomography scan. The simulated trajectory angles were analyzed with dedicated software for medical images, defining the ACA and distances to critical otological structures.
RESULTS: The ACA are the smallest for surgical techniques that pass thought the PT. However, performing a surgical PT can include variability in the ACA, ranging from almost 0° to 20.8° in an out-plane angle, depending on how close a surgeon would approach the facial nerve. The Veria, Suprameatal approach (SMA), and peri-canal approaches have larger ACA and minimal distances to the ossicular chain and the ear canal. The maximum distance to the facial nerve and the widest out-plane angle is observe with a pericanal approach. The optimal PT approach refers to the trajectory without collisions and with the best possible ACA that can be planned.
CONCLUSION: Different surgical approaches yield important differences in the ACA. PT allows better ACA with maximum distances to the critical structures. However, the optimal PT trajectory simulated for robotic keyhole surgery is a further improvement on the trajectories through the facial recess.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32209514      PMCID: PMC7224420          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2020.8113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  17 in total

1.  Variability of the mental representation of the cochlear anatomy during cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Renato Torres; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Daniele Bernardeschi; Daniele De Seta; Jean Loup Bensimon; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A surgical approach for a cochlear implant: an anatomical study.

Authors:  G M Clark
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Improvement of the insertion axis for cochlear implantation with a robot-based system.

Authors:  Renato Torres; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Daniele De Seta; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].

Authors:  E Lehnhardt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children.

Authors:  N L Cohen; R A Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 6.  Systematic Review on Surgical Outcomes and Hearing Preservation for Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Hanneke Bruijnzeel; Kaspar Draaisma; Roderick van Grootel; Inge Stegeman; Vedat Topsakal; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Retrospective complication rate comparison between surgical techniques in paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  H Bruijnzeel; F Ziylan; G Cattani; W Grolman; V Topsakal
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation surgery: first report of clinical implementation.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Ramya Balachandran; Jack H Noble; Grégoire S Blachon; Jason E Mitchell; Fitsum A Reda; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Prospective Validation of Facial Nerve Monitoring to Prevent Nerve Damage During Robotic Drilling.

Authors:  Juan Ansó; Cilgia Dür; Mareike Apelt; Frederic Venail; Olivier Scheidegger; Kathleen Seidel; Helene Rohrbach; Franck Forterre; Matthias S Dettmer; Inti Zlobec; Klaus Weber; Marco Matulic; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Markus Huth; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-10-01

10.  Instrument flight to the inner ear.

Authors:  S Weber; K Gavaghan; W Wimmer; T Williamson; N Gerber; J Anso; B Bell; A Feldmann; C Rathgeb; M Matulic; M Stebinger; D Schneider; G Mantokoudis; O Scheidegger; F Wagner; M Kompis; M Caversaccio
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2017-03-15
View more
  6 in total

1.  A New Pathogenic Variant in POU3F4 Causing Deafness Due to an Incomplete Partition of the Cochlea Paved the Way for Innovative Surgery.

Authors:  Ahmet M Tekin; Marco Matulic; Wim Wuyts; Masoud Zoka Assadi; Griet Mertens; Vincent van Rompaey; Yongxin Li; Paul van de Heyning; Vedat Topsakal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Clinical Translation of an Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine E Riojas; Emily T Tran; Michael H Freeman; Jack H Noble; Robert J Webster; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Image-Based Planning of Minimally Traumatic Inner Ear Access for Robotic Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Fabian Mueller; Jan Hermann; Stefan Weber; Gabriela O'Toole Bom Braga; Vedat Topsakal
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Vascular Anomaly in the Fallopian Canal Encountered Unexpectedly During Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Itay Chen; Jean-Yves Sichel; Eliel Ben-David; Ronen Perez
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  First Study in Men Evaluating a Surgical Robotic Tool Providing Autonomous Inner Ear Access for Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Vedat Topsakal; Emilie Heuninck; Marco Matulic; Ahmet M Tekin; Griet Mertens; Vincent Van Rompaey; Pablo Galeazzi; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Paul van de Heyning
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.