Literature DB >> 26324880

Variability of the mental representation of the cochlear anatomy during cochlear implantation.

Renato Torres1,2,3, Guillaume Kazmitcheff2,3,4, Daniele Bernardeschi1,2,3, Daniele De Seta1,2,3,5, Jean Loup Bensimon3,6, Evelyne Ferrary1,2,3, Olivier Sterkers1,2,3, Yann Nguyen7,8,9.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the mental representation of the insertion axis of surgeons with different degrees of experience, and reproducibility of the insertion axis in repeated measures. A mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy were prepared in five different artificial temporal bones. A cone-beam CT was performed for each temporal bone and the data were registered on a magnetic navigation system. In these five temporal bones, 16 surgeons (3 experts; >50 cochlear implant surgery/year; 7 fellows with few cochlear implant experience, and 6 residents) were asked to determine the optimal insertion axis according to their mental representation. Compared to a planned ideal axis, the insertion axis was better determined by the experts with higher accuracy (axial: 7° ± 1.5°, coronal: 6° ± 1.5°) than fellows (axial: 14° ± 1.7°, coronal: 13° ± 1.7°; p < 0.05), or residents (axial: 15° ± 1.5°; p < 0.001, coronal: 17° ± 1.9°; p < 0.001). This study suggests that mental representation of the cochlea is experience-dependent. A high variation of the insertion axis to the scala tympani can be observed due to the complexity of the temporal bone anatomy and lack of landmarks to determine scala tympani orientation. Navigation systems can be used to evaluate and improve mental representation of the insertion axis to the scala tympani for cochlear implant surgery.

Keywords:  Cochleostomy; Computer assisted surgery; Insertion axis; Learning curve; Navigation; Round window

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26324880     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3763-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  32 in total

1.  Cochlear implant insertion forces in microdissected human cochlea to evaluate a prototype array.

Authors:  Yann Nguyen; Mathieu Miroir; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Jasmine Sutter; Morad Bensidhoum; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Validation of a networked virtual reality simulation of temporal bone surgery.

Authors:  Stephen J O'Leary; Matthew A Hutchins; Duncan R Stevenson; Chris Gunn; Alexander Krumpholz; Gregor Kennedy; Michael Tykocinski; Marcus Dahm; Brian Pyman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Variational anatomy of the human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Elsa Erixon; Herman Högstorp; Karin Wadin; Helge Rask-Andersen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  The visible ear surgery simulator.

Authors:  Peter Trier; Karsten Østergaard Noe; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Jesper Mosegaard
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

5.  Three-dimensional modeling of the temporal bone for surgical training.

Authors:  David Bakhos; Stéphane Velut; Alain Robier; Musaed Al zahrani; Emmanuel Lescanne
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frederic Venail; Caroline Mathiolon; Sophie Menjot de Champfleur; Jean Pierre Piron; Marielle Sicard; Françoise Villemus; Marie Aude Vessigaud; Françoise Sterkers-Artieres; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 7.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  An artificial temporal bone as a training tool for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Christof Roosli; Jae Hoon Sim; Hendrik Möckel; Markus Mokosch; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: evidence from allocentric judgments.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jack M Loomis; Roberta L Klatzky; Reginald G Golledge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ersin Avci; Tim Nauwelaers; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improvement of the insertion axis for cochlear implantation with a robot-based system.

Authors:  Renato Torres; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Daniele De Seta; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear.

Authors:  Vedat Topsakal; Marco Matulic; Masoud Zoka Assadi; Griet Mertens; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  A New Pathogenic Variant in POU3F4 Causing Deafness Due to an Incomplete Partition of the Cochlea Paved the Way for Innovative Surgery.

Authors:  Ahmet M Tekin; Marco Matulic; Wim Wuyts; Masoud Zoka Assadi; Griet Mertens; Vincent van Rompaey; Yongxin Li; Paul van de Heyning; Vedat Topsakal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  A cadaver study of mastoidectomy using an image-guided human-robot collaborative control system.

Authors:  Myung Hoon Yoo; Hwan Seo Lee; Chan Joo Yang; Seung Hwan Lee; Hoon Lim; Seongpung Lee; Byung-Ju Yi; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-25

5.  First Study in Men Evaluating a Surgical Robotic Tool Providing Autonomous Inner Ear Access for Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Vedat Topsakal; Emilie Heuninck; Marco Matulic; Ahmet M Tekin; Griet Mertens; Vincent Van Rompaey; Pablo Galeazzi; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Paul van de Heyning
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.