Literature DB >> 33995757

Clinical Translation of an Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Katherine E Riojas1, Emily T Tran2, Michael H Freeman3, Jack H Noble4, Robert J Webster1, Robert F Labadie3.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to describe the development of a minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery (MICIS) electrode array insertion tool concept to enable clinical translation. First, analysis of the geometric parameters of potential MICIS patients (N = 97) was performed to inform tool design, inform MICIS phantom model design, and provide further insight into MICIS candidacy. Design changes were made to the insertion tool based on clinical requirements and parameter analysis results. A MICIS phantom testing model was built to evaluate insertion force profiles in a clinically realistic manner, and the new tool design was evaluated in the model and in cadavers to test clinical viability. Finally, after regulatory approval, the tool was used for the first time in a clinical case. Results of this work included first, in the parameter analysis, approximately 20% of the population was not considered viable MICIS candidates. Additionally, one 3D printed tool could accommodate all viable candidates with polyimide sheath length adjustments accounting for interpatient variation. The insertion tool design was miniaturized out of clinical necessity and a disassembly method, necessary for removal around the cochlear implant, was developed and tested. Phantom model testing revealed that the force profile of the insertion tool was similar to that of traditional forceps insertion. Cadaver testing demonstrated that all clinical requirements (including complete disassembly) were achieved with the tool, and the new tool enabled 15% deeper insertions compared to the forceps approach. Finally, and most importantly, the tool helped achieve a full insertion in its first MICIS clinical case. In conclusion, the new insertion tool provides a clinically viable solution to one of the most difficult aspects of MICIS.
Copyright © 2021 by ASME.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33995757      PMCID: PMC8086187          DOI: 10.1115/1.4050203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Device        ISSN: 1932-6181            Impact factor:   0.743


  35 in total

1.  Veria operation updated. I. The trans-canal wall cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Trifon Kiratzidis; Wolfgang Arnold; Theophilos Iliades
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  A robot-guided minimally invasive approach for cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results of a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  W M Wells; P Viola; H Atsumi; S Nakajima; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Population Statistics Approach for Safety Assessment in Robotic Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Tom Williamson; Kate Gavaghan; Nicolas Gerber; Stefan Weder; Lukas Anschuetz; Franca Wagner; Christian Weisstanner; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Insertion forces and intracochlear trauma in temporal bone specimens implanted with a straight atraumatic electrode array.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Silke Hügl; Saleh Mohebbi; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Statistical shape model segmentation and frequency mapping of cochlear implant stimulation targets in CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Robert F Labadie; Benoît M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

10.  Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man.

Authors:  Marco Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer; Juan Anso; Georgios Mantokoudis; Nicolas Gerber; Christoph Rathgeb; Daniel Schneider; Jan Hermann; Franca Wagner; Olivier Scheidegger; Markus Huth; Lukas Anschuetz; Martin Kompis; Tom Williamson; Brett Bell; Kate Gavaghan; Stefan Weber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.