Literature DB >> 3220590

Handling of cytostatic drugs and urine mutagenesis.

D Poyen1, M P De Méo, A Botta, J Gouvernet, G Duménil.   

Abstract

As part of a French national epidemiologic study on human reproduction among hospital personnel, we investigated urine mutagenicity of nurses and personnel from oncology units exposed to cytostatic drugs. During a first series of experiments, urine mutagenicity of 47 subjects working in six oncology units was investigated in the Marseille regional's hospital. A control group of 37 individuals working in one cardiology clinic was also included. Urinary mutagens were extracted on XAD-2 resin and tested by two bacterial mutagenicity tests: the Ames test with tester strains Salmonella typhimurium TA 97, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with or without metabolic activation (S9 MiX) and the SOS Chromotest with tester strain Escherichia coli PQ 37-S9 MIX. Bactericidal activity towards the tester strains was found in 40% of the urine samples (36/90). During a second series of experiments, urine mutagenicity of 17 office clerks was also investigated. Toxicity was found in six of the 21 urine samples. No significant difference of toxicity distribution and no relationship between toxicity and cigarette smoking were found. Qualitative analysis of the data showed no significant difference among the exposed groups and the control group (Chi 2 = 0.529, df = 2) with tester strain TA 98 + S9 MIX. Cigarette smoking was found to be the main factor of increased urinary mutagenicity (Chi 2 = 0.529, df = 1). Quantitative analysis of the data showed that mutagenic potencies varied from 0.332 +/- 0.539 revertants/mg creatinine to 7.226 +/- 6.743 revertants/mg creatinine with TA 98 + S9 MIX.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3220590     DOI: 10.1007/bf00381017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  16 in total

1.  Occupational handling of cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  B Kolmodin-Hedman; P Hartvig; M Sorsa; K Falck
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Mutagenicity in urine of nurses handling cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  K Falck; P Gröhn; M Sorsa; H Vainio; E Heinonen; L R Holsti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test.

Authors:  B N Ames; J Mccann; E Yamasaki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Exposure of pharmacy personnel to mutagenic antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J C Theiss; T S Matney
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Mutagen testing using TRP+ reversion in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M H Green; W J Muriel
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Mutagens in human urine: effects of cigarette smoking and diet.

Authors:  I M Sasson; D T Coleman; E J LaVoie; D Hoffmann; E L Wynder
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Limitations of urinary mutagen assays for monitoring occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  P G Tuffnell; M T Gannon; A Dong; G DeBoer; C Erlichman
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1986-02

8.  Concentration of mutagens from urine by absorption with the nonpolar resin XAD-2: cigarette smokers have mutagenic urine.

Authors:  E Yamasaki; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Occupational exposure to anticancer drug--potential and real hazards.

Authors:  M Sorsa; K Hemminki; H Vainio
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Mutagenicity of urine from nurses handling cytostatic drugs, influence of smoking.

Authors:  R P Bos; A O Leenaars; J L Theuws; P T Henderson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.015

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Drugs hazardous to healthcare workers. Evaluation of methods for monitoring occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R P Bos
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. I. Methods of testing exposure.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

3.  Monitoring exposure of hospital personnel handling cytostatic drugs and contaminated materials.

Authors:  M P DeMéo; S Mérono; A D DeBaille; A Botta; M Laget; H Guiraud; G Duménil
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Urinary biological monitoring markers of anticancer drug exposure in oncology nurses.

Authors:  M A Newman; B G Valanis; R S Schoeny; S Q Hee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Detection of contamination with antineoplastic agents in a hospital pharmacy department.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R B Anzion; P H Van den Broek; R P Bos
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-02-21

6.  Evaluation of phosphine genotoxicity at occupational levels of exposure in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  A Barbosa; A M Bonin
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.402

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.