Literature DB >> 3929080

Occupational exposure to anticancer drug--potential and real hazards.

M Sorsa, K Hemminki, H Vainio.   

Abstract

Many anticancer agents have been shown to be mutagenic, teratogenic and carcinogenic in experimental systems and second malignancies are known to be associated with several specific therapeutic treatments. Anticancer agents thus represent a class of occupational carcinogens, the handling of which should involve no unnecessary exposure. The available methodologies to detect possible exposures from ambient air and from biological samples are discussed, and the published data on results are reviewed. Analytical methods are available for the detection of most frequently used anticancer drugs from all groups, i.e., alkylating agents, mitotic inhibitors, antimetabolites and antibiotics. The ambient samples taken from sites of admixture of cytostatics have often shown detectable, but low concentrations of anticancer agents. Urine samples from patients under chemotherapy as well as from personnel handling the drugs occupationally in hospitals have been analyzed both chemically and for excreted mutagenicity. Both cisplatin and cyclophosphamide have been detected in the urine of patients; furthermore, cyclophosphamide was observed in the urine of nurses who formulate and deliver this drug. Urinary mutagenicity assays have given both positive and negative results in various groups of nursing and pharmacy personnel. Cytogenetic methods have, likewise, been applied for monitoring purposes. Most of the available data concerns chromosome aberrations (CA) or sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) induced in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients under chemotherapy. A few studies on groups occupationally exposed to anticancer drugs have given positive results, but also negative reports have appeared for these same cytogenetic parameters. No studies are as yet available on the possible carcinogenic effects of occupational handling of anticancer drugs. Two recent case-referent studies among hospital personnel have pointed to slightly increased risks of disorders in pregnancy outcome; one of the studies has shown an excess of spontaneous abortions and other malformations in children of females with a history of work with anticancer agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3929080     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  19 in total

Review 1.  Drugs hazardous to healthcare workers. Evaluation of methods for monitoring occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R P Bos
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. I. Methods of testing exposure.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

3.  Mortality patterns among female nurses: a 27-state study, 1984 through 1990.

Authors:  L A Peipins; C Burnett; T Alterman; N Lalich
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Human effect monitoring in cases of occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: a method comparison.

Authors:  S Kevekordes; T W Gebel; M Hellwig; W Dames; H Dunkelberg
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Development of a new method for sampling and monitoring oncology staff exposed to cyclophosphamide drug.

Authors:  Davood Panahi; Mansour Azari; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Rezvan Zendehdel; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Hossein Hatami; Yadollah Mehrabi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  [Pregnancy and professional activity].

Authors:  R Huch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Monitoring exposure of hospital personnel handling cytostatic drugs and contaminated materials.

Authors:  M P DeMéo; S Mérono; A D DeBaille; A Botta; M Laget; H Guiraud; G Duménil
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Clastogenic effect of hippeastidine (HIPP) (1,2,3,4,4a,6 hexahydro-10,hydroxy-3,8,9,trimethoxy-5,10b, ethanophenanthridine).

Authors:  M Alarcón; G Cea; G Weigert
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Occupational cancer prevention.

Authors:  H Vainio
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Leukaemia and reproductive outcome among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  T Skov; B Maarup; J Olsen; M Rørth; H Winthereik; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.