Literature DB >> 7782118

Monitoring exposure of hospital personnel handling cytostatic drugs and contaminated materials.

M P DeMéo1, S Mérono, A D DeBaille, A Botta, M Laget, H Guiraud, G Duménil.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to evaluate the urine mutagenicity of 63 individuals working in four hospital departments. The exposed group included 38 subjects who were exposed to various cytostatic drugs and/or contaminated material from treated patients. The control group included 25 individuals of the hospital personnel. Urine mutagenicity was monitored by the Ames test using tester strains TA 98 + S9 Mix and TA 102-S9 Mix. Urine samples were collected before and after the working periods. A total of 29/116 (25%) urine samples were mutagenic for either strain. Among the mutagenic samples, 24/29 were mutagenic for tester strain TA 98 exclusively. No significant correlation could be found between occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs and urine mutagenicity evaluated by the strain TA 98 + S9 Mix. Smoking was the main environmental factor that modulated urine mutagenicity with TA 98. Three subjects in the exposed group had mutagenic urine samples at the end of the working period with strain TA 102-S9 Mix. This mutagenicity was related to occupational exposure to cisplatin. In the control group, one individual had mutagenic samples before and after the working period. Assessing occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs with strain TA 102 requires additional studies to determine environmental mutagens which can be detected by this strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7782118     DOI: 10.1007/bf00383141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of the mutagenic and genotoxic activities of 48 nitroimidazoles and related imidazole derivatives by the Ames test and the SOS chromotest.

Authors:  M De Méo; P Vanelle; E Bernadini; M Laget; J Maldonado; O Jentzer; M P Crozet; G Duménil
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Occupational exposure to cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  M Hirst; S Tse; D G Mills; L Levin; D F White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Occupational handling of cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  B Kolmodin-Hedman; P Hartvig; M Sorsa; K Falck
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Mutagenicity in urine of nurses handling cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  K Falck; P Gröhn; M Sorsa; H Vainio; E Heinonen; L R Holsti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Detection of occupational exposure to genotoxic agents with a urinary mutagen assay.

Authors:  D Kriebel; B Commoner; D Bollinger; A Bronsdon; J Gold; J Henry
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Exposure of hospital workers to airborne antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  A deWerk Neal; R A Wadden; W L Chiou
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1983-04

7.  Handling of cytostatic drugs and urine mutagenesis.

Authors:  D Poyen; M P De Méo; A Botta; J Gouvernet; G Duménil
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Mutagenicity of urine from nurses handling cytostatic drugs, influence of smoking.

Authors:  R P Bos; A O Leenaars; J L Theuws; P T Henderson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  High sensitivity of Salmonella TA102 in detecting hexavalent chromium mutagenicity and its reversal by liver and lung preparations.

Authors:  C Bennicelli; A Camoirano; S Petruzzelli; P Zanacchi; S De Flora
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Mutagenicity testing with TA97 and TA102 of 30 DNA-damaging compounds, negative with other Salmonella strains.

Authors:  S De Flora; A Camoirano; P Zanacchi; C Bennicelli
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1984 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Drugs hazardous to healthcare workers. Evaluation of methods for monitoring occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R P Bos
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Biological monitoring: state of the art.

Authors:  P Hoet; V Haufroid
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Micronuclei and chromosome aberrations in subjects occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs: a multicentric approach.

Authors:  Massimo Moretti; Maria Giuseppa Grollino; Sofia Pavanello; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Milena Villarini; Massimo Appolloni; Mariella Carrieri; Laura Sabatini; Luca Dominici; Laura Stronati; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Anna Barbieri; Cristina Fatigoni; Giovanni Battista Bartolucci; Elisabetta Ceretti; Francesca Mussi; Silvano Monarca
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  A study protocol for the evaluation of occupational mutagenic/carcinogenic risks in subjects exposed to antineoplastic drugs: a multicentric project.

Authors:  Massimo Moretti; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Donatella Feretti; Sofia Pavanello; Francesca Mussi; Maria G Grollino; Milena Villarini; Anna Barbieri; Elisabetta Ceretti; Mariella Carrieri; Annamaria Buschini; Massimo Appolloni; Luca Dominici; Laura Sabatini; Umberto Gelatti; Giovanni B Bartolucci; Paola Poli; Laura Stronati; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Silvano Monarca
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.