Literature DB >> 32205290

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Using Digital Next-Generation Sequencing.

Anne Macgregor-Das1, Jun Yu2, Koji Tamura1, Toshiya Abe1, Masaya Suenaga1, Koji Shindo1, Michael Borges1, Chiho Koi1, Shiro Kohi1, Yoshihiko Sadakari1, Marco Dal Molin1, Jose A Almario1, Madeline Ford1, Miguel Chuidian1, Richard Burkhart2, Jin He2, Ralph H Hruban3, James R Eshleman3, Alison P Klein3, Christopher L Wolfgang2, Marcia I Canto4, Michael Goggins5.   

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurements can be used to estimate tumor burden, but avoiding false-positive results is challenging. Herein, digital next-generation sequencing (NGS) is evaluated as a ctDNA detection method. Plasma KRAS and GNAS hotspot mutation levels were measured in 140 subjects, including 67 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 73 healthy and disease controls. To limit chemical modifications of DNA that yield false-positive mutation calls, plasma DNA was enzymatically pretreated, after which DNA was aliquoted for digital detection of mutations (up to 384 aliquots/sample) by PCR and NGS. A digital NGS score of two SDs above the mean in controls was considered positive. Thirty-seven percent of patients with pancreatic cancer, including 31% of patients with stages I/II disease, had positive KRAS codon 12 ctDNA scores; only one patient had a positive GNAS mutation score. Two disease control patients had positive ctDNA scores. Low-normal-range digital NGS scores at mutation hotspots were found at similar levels in healthy and disease controls, usually at sites of cytosine deamination, and were likely the result of chemical modification of plasma DNA and NGS error rather than true mutations. Digital NGS detects mutated ctDNA in patients with pancreatic cancer with similar yield to other methods. Detection of low-level, true-positive ctDNA is limited by frequent low-level detection of false-positive mutation calls in plasma DNA from controls.
Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32205290      PMCID: PMC7338889          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  42 in total

1.  Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Peter Bailey; David K Chang; Katia Nones; Amber L Johns; Ann-Marie Patch; Marie-Claude Gingras; David K Miller; Angelika N Christ; Tim J C Bruxner; Michael C Quinn; Craig Nourse; L Charles Murtaugh; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Suzanne Manning; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Shivangi Wani; Lynn Fink; Oliver Holmes; Venessa Chin; Matthew J Anderson; Stephen Kazakoff; Conrad Leonard; Felicity Newell; Nick Waddell; Scott Wood; Qinying Xu; Peter J Wilson; Nicole Cloonan; Karin S Kassahn; Darrin Taylor; Kelly Quek; Alan Robertson; Lorena Pantano; Laura Mincarelli; Luis N Sanchez; Lisa Evers; Jianmin Wu; Mark Pinese; Mark J Cowley; Marc D Jones; Emily K Colvin; Adnan M Nagrial; Emily S Humphrey; Lorraine A Chantrill; Amanda Mawson; Jeremy Humphris; Angela Chou; Marina Pajic; Christopher J Scarlett; Andreia V Pinho; Marc Giry-Laterriere; Ilse Rooman; Jaswinder S Samra; James G Kench; Jessica A Lovell; Neil D Merrett; Christopher W Toon; Krishna Epari; Nam Q Nguyen; Andrew Barbour; Nikolajs Zeps; Kim Moran-Jones; Nigel B Jamieson; Janet S Graham; Fraser Duthie; Karin Oien; Jane Hair; Robert Grützmann; Anirban Maitra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard A Morgan; Rita T Lawlor; Vincenzo Corbo; Claudio Bassi; Borislav Rusev; Paola Capelli; Roberto Salvia; Giampaolo Tortora; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Gloria M Petersen; Donna M Munzy; William E Fisher; Saadia A Karim; James R Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Christian Pilarsky; Jennifer P Morton; Owen J Sansom; Aldo Scarpa; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Ulla-Maja Hagbo Bailey; Oliver Hofmann; Robert L Sutherland; David A Wheeler; Anthony J Gill; Richard A Gibbs; John V Pearson; Nicola Waddell; Andrew V Biankin; Sean M Grimmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Lola Rahib; Benjamin D Smith; Rhonda Aizenberg; Allison B Rosenzweig; Julie M Fleshman; Lynn M Matrisian
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples.

Authors:  Angie Ambers; Meredith Turnbough; Robert Benjamin; Jonathan King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Marcia Irene Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Elliot K Fishman; Ihab R Kamel; Richard Schulick; Zhe Zhang; Mark Topazian; Naoki Takahashi; Joel Fletcher; Gloria Petersen; Alison P Klein; Jennifer Axilbund; Constance Griffin; Sapna Syngal; John R Saltzman; Koenraad J Mortele; Jeffrey Lee; Eric Tamm; Raghunandan Vikram; Priya Bhosale; Daniel Margolis; James Farrell; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  High prevalence of mutant KRAS in circulating exosome-derived DNA from early-stage pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  K Allenson; J Castillo; F A San Lucas; G Scelo; D U Kim; V Bernard; G Davis; T Kumar; M Katz; M J Overman; L Foretova; E Fabianova; I Holcatova; V Janout; F Meric-Bernstam; P Gascoyne; I Wistuba; G Varadhachary; P Brennan; S Hanash; D Li; A Maitra; H Alvarez
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Cytosine deamination is a major cause of baseline noise in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Stacy Mosier; Christopher D Gocke; Ming-Tseh Lin; James R Eshleman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Mutant GNAS detected in duodenal collections of secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice indicates the presence or emergence of pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Spencer Knight; Mark Topazian; Sapna Syngal; James Farrell; Jeffrey Lee; Ihab Kamel; Anne Marie Lennon; Michael Borges; Angela Young; Sho Fujiwara; Junro Seike; James Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Digital next-generation sequencing identifies low-abundance mutations in pancreatic juice samples collected from the duodenum of patients with pancreatic cancer and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Jun Yu; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Koji Shindo; Masaya Suenaga; Aaron Brant; Jose Alejandro Navarro Almario; Michael Borges; Thomas Barkley; Shahriar Fesharakizadeh; Madeline Ford; Ralph H Hruban; Eun Ji Shin; Anne Marie Lennon; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  A pilot study evaluating concordance between blood-based and patient-matched tumor molecular testing within pancreatic cancer patients participating in the Know Your Tumor (KYT) initiative.

Authors:  Michael J Pishvaian; R Joseph Bender; Lynn M Matrisian; Lola Rahib; Andrew Hendifar; William A Hoos; Sam Mikhail; Vincent Chung; Vincent Picozzi; Craig Heartwell; Kimberly Mason; Katelyn Varieur; Metasebia Aberra; Subha Madhavan; Emanuel Petricoin; Jonathan R Brody
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-08

10.  Simple, multiplexed, PCR-based barcoding of DNA enables sensitive mutation detection in liquid biopsies using sequencing.

Authors:  Anders Ståhlberg; Paul M Krzyzanowski; Jennifer B Jackson; Matthew Egyud; Lincoln Stein; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The genetics of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the year 2020: dramatic progress, but far to go.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Thompson; Nicholas J Roberts; Laura D Wood; James R Eshleman; Michael G Goggins; Scott E Kern; Alison P Klein; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Leveraging the Fragment Length of Circulating Tumour DNA to Improve Molecular Profiling of Solid Tumour Malignancies with Next-Generation Sequencing: A Pathway to Advanced Non-invasive Diagnostics in Precision Oncology?

Authors:  Hunter R Underhill
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 3.  Evaluating Pancreatic and Biliary Neoplasms with Small Biopsy-Based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Doing More with Less.

Authors:  Ilias P Nikas; Giannis Mountzios; Guy I Sydney; Kalliopi J Ioakim; Jae-Kyung Won; Panagiotis Papageorgis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.