Literature DB >> 22859495

Mutant GNAS detected in duodenal collections of secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice indicates the presence or emergence of pancreatic cysts.

Mitsuro Kanda1, Spencer Knight, Mark Topazian, Sapna Syngal, James Farrell, Jeffrey Lee, Ihab Kamel, Anne Marie Lennon, Michael Borges, Angela Young, Sho Fujiwara, Junro Seike, James Eshleman, Ralph H Hruban, Marcia Irene Canto, Michael Goggins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic cysts are commonly detected in patients undergoing pancreatic imaging. Better approaches are needed to characterise these lesions. In this study we evaluated the utility of detecting mutant DNA in secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice.
DESIGN: Secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice was collected from the duodenum of 291 subjects enrolled in Cancer of the Pancreas Screening trials at five US academic medical centres. The study population included subjects with a familial predisposition to pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic screening, and disease controls with normal pancreata, chronic pancreatitis, sporadic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) or other neoplasms. Somatic GNAS mutations (reported prevalence ≈ 66% of IPMNs) were measured using digital high-resolution melt-curve analysis and pyrosequencing.
RESULTS: GNAS mutations were detected in secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice samples of 50 of 78 familial and sporadic cases of IPMN(s) (64.1%), 15 of 33 (45.5%) with only diminutive cysts (<5 mm), but none of 57 disease controls. GNAS mutations were also detected in five of 123 screened subjects without a pancreatic cyst. Among 97 subjects who had serial pancreatic evaluations, GNAS mutations detected in baseline juice samples predicted subsequent emergence or increasing size of pancreatic cysts.
CONCLUSION: Duodenal collections of secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice from patients with IPMNs have a similar prevalence of mutant GNAS to primary IPMNs, indicating that these samples are an excellent source of mutant DNA from the pancreas. The detection of GNAS mutations before an IPMN is visible suggests that analysis of pancreatic juice has the potential to help in the risk stratification and surveillance of patients undergoing pancreatic screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GNAS; Pancreatic cancer; colonic polyps; endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; endoscopic ultrasonography; endoscopy; gastrointesinal endoscopy; gastrointestinal neoplasia; gastrointestinal ultrasound; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; methylation; oncogenes; pancreas; pancreatic cyst; pancreatic disease; pancreatic disorders; pancreatic juice; pancreatic tumours

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22859495      PMCID: PMC3893110          DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  45 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Verna; Caroline Hwang; Peter D Stevens; Heidrun Rotterdam; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Carolyn D Sy; Martin A Prince; Wendy K Chung; Robert L Fine; John A Chabot; Harold Frucht
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka; Suresh Chari; Volkan Adsay; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Massimo Falconi; Michio Shimizu; Koji Yamaguchi; Kenji Yamao; Seiki Matsuno
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Imprinting of the G(s)alpha gene GNAS1 in the pathogenesis of acromegaly.

Authors:  B E Hayward; A Barlier; M Korbonits; A B Grossman; P Jacquet; A Enjalbert; D T Bonthron
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  DNA methylation alterations in the pancreatic juice of patients with suspected pancreatic disease.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Marcia Canto; Norihiro Sato; Alison Klein; Tadayoshi Abe; Keishi Yamashita; Charles J Yeo; Anthony Kalloo; Ralph Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development.

Authors:  Jian Wu; Hanno Matthaei; Anirban Maitra; Marco Dal Molin; Laura D Wood; James R Eshleman; Michael Goggins; Marcia I Canto; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Alison P Klein; Luis A Diaz; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Ralph H Hruban; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rajan; Jonathan E Clain; Michael J Levy; Ian D Norton; Kenneth K Wang; Maurits J Wiersema; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Barbara J Nelson; Mary L Jondal; Rebecca K Kendall; W Scott Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Ralph H Hruban; Kyoichi Takaori; David S Klimstra; N Volkan Adsay; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; Andrew V Biankin; Sandra A Biankin; Carolyn Compton; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Toru Furukawa; Michael Goggins; Yo Kato; Gunter Klöppel; Daniel S Longnecker; Jutta Lüttges; Anirban Maitra; G Johan A Offerhaus; Michio Shimizu; Suguru Yonezawa
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  The yield of first-time endoscopic ultrasonography in screening individuals at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J W Poley; I Kluijt; D J Gouma; F Harinck; A Wagner; C Aalfs; C H J van Eijck; A Cats; E J Kuipers; Y Nio; P Fockens; M J Bruno
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Bhramar Mukherjee; Nabihah Tayob; Fei Wang; Jennifer Sparr; Victoria M Raymond; Prathap Bandipalliam; Elena M Stoffel; Stephen B Gruber; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Five years of prospective screening of high-risk individuals from families with familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Langer; P H Kann; V Fendrich; N Habbe; M Schneider; M Sina; E P Slater; J T Heverhagen; T M Gress; M Rothmund; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Clinical approach to incidental pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Austin L Chiang; Linda S Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pancreatic Juice Mutation Concentrations Can Help Predict the Grade of Dysplasia in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surveillance.

Authors:  Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Koji Shindo; Koji Tamura; Jose Alejandro Almario; Christopher Zaykoski; P Dane Witmer; Shahriar Fesharakizadeh; Michael Borges; Anne-Marie Lennon; Eun-Ji Shin; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  The chromatin regulator Brg1 suppresses formation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guido von Figura; Akihisa Fukuda; Nilotpal Roy; Muluye E Liku; John P Morris Iv; Grace E Kim; Holger A Russ; Matthew A Firpo; Sean J Mulvihill; David W Dawson; Jorge Ferrer; William F Mueller; Anke Busch; Klemens J Hertel; Matthias Hebrok
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Pathological and molecular evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Arvind Rishi; Michael Goggins; Laura D Wood; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Can we better predict the biologic behavior of incidental IPMN? A comprehensive analysis of molecular diagnostics and biomarkers in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Kiara A Tulla; Ajay V Maker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Cytosine deamination is a major cause of baseline noise in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Stacy Mosier; Christopher D Gocke; Ming-Tseh Lin; James R Eshleman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  GNAS sequencing identifies IPMN-specific mutations in a subgroup of diminutive pancreatic cysts referred to as "incipient IPMNs".

Authors:  Hanno Matthaei; Jian Wu; Marco Dal Molin; Chanjuan Shi; Sven Perner; Glen Kristiansen; Philipp Lingohr; Jörg C Kalff; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Anirban Maitra; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Diversity of clinical implication of B-cell translocation gene 1 expression by histopathologic and anatomic subtypes of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Hisaharu Oya; Shuji Nomoto; Hideki Takami; Dai Shimizu; Ryoji Hashimoto; Satoshi Sueoka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  KRAS and guanine nucleotide-binding protein mutations in pancreatic juice collected from the duodenum of patients at high risk for neoplasia undergoing endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  James R Eshleman; Alexis L Norris; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Marija Debeljak; Michael Borges; Colleen Harrington; Elaine Lin; Aaron Brant; Thomas Barkley; J Alejandro Almario; Mark Topazian; James Farrell; Sapna Syngal; Jeffrey H Lee; Jun Yu; Ralph H Hruban; Mitsuro Kanda; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.