Literature DB >> 22245846

Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals.

Marcia Irene Canto1, Ralph H Hruban, Elliot K Fishman, Ihab R Kamel, Richard Schulick, Zhe Zhang, Mark Topazian, Naoki Takahashi, Joel Fletcher, Gloria Petersen, Alison P Klein, Jennifer Axilbund, Constance Griffin, Sapna Syngal, John R Saltzman, Koenraad J Mortele, Jeffrey Lee, Eric Tamm, Raghunandan Vikram, Priya Bhosale, Daniel Margolis, James Farrell, Michael Goggins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk of pancreatic cancer is increased in patients with a strong family history of pancreatic cancer or a predisposing germline mutation. Screening can detect curable, noninvasive pancreatic neoplasms, but the optimal imaging approach is not known. We determined the baseline prevalence and characteristics of pancreatic abnormalities using 3 imaging tests to screen asymptomatic, high-risk individuals (HRIs).
METHODS: We screened 225 asymptomatic adult HRIs at 5 academic US medical centers once, using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). We compared results in a blinded, independent fashion.
RESULTS: Ninety-two of 216 HRIs (42%) were found to have at least 1 pancreatic mass (84 cystic, 3 solid) or a dilated pancreatic duct (n = 5) by any of the imaging modalities. Fifty-one of the 84 HRIs with a cyst (60.7%) had multiple lesions, typically small (mean, 0.55 cm; range, 2-39 mm), in multiple locations. The prevalence of pancreatic lesions increased with age; they were detected in 14% of subjects younger than 50 years old, 34% of subjects 50-59 years old, and 53% of subjects 60-69 years old (P < .0001). CT, MRI, and EUS detected a pancreatic abnormality in 11%, 33.3%, and 42.6% of the HRIs, respectively. Among these abnormalities, proven or suspected neoplasms were identified in 85 HRIs (82 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and 3 pancreatic endocrine tumors). Three of 5 HRIs who underwent pancreatic resection had high-grade dysplasia in less than 3 cm intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and in multiple intraepithelial neoplasias.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening of asymptomatic HRIs frequently detects small pancreatic cysts, including curable, noninvasive high-grade neoplasms. EUS and MRI detect pancreatic lesions better than CT.
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245846      PMCID: PMC3321068          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  36 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Verna; Caroline Hwang; Peter D Stevens; Heidrun Rotterdam; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Carolyn D Sy; Martin A Prince; Wendy K Chung; Robert L Fine; John A Chabot; Harold Frucht
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Hollerbach; A Klamann; T Topalidis; W H Schmiegel
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families.

Authors:  E P Slater; P Langer; E Niemczyk; K Strauch; J Butler; N Habbe; J P Neoptolemos; W Greenhalf; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Pancreatic cancer genetic epidemiology consortium.

Authors:  Gloria M Petersen; Mariza de Andrade; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Melissa Bondy; Jeannette F Korczak; Steven Gallinger; Henry T Lynch; Sapna Syngal; Kari G Rabe; Daniela Seminara; Alison P Klein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Ralph H Hruban; Kyoichi Takaori; David S Klimstra; N Volkan Adsay; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; Andrew V Biankin; Sandra A Biankin; Carolyn Compton; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Toru Furukawa; Michael Goggins; Yo Kato; Gunter Klöppel; Daniel S Longnecker; Jutta Lüttges; Anirban Maitra; G Johan A Offerhaus; Michio Shimizu; Suguru Yonezawa
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  The yield of first-time endoscopic ultrasonography in screening individuals at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J W Poley; I Kluijt; D J Gouma; F Harinck; A Wagner; C Aalfs; C H J van Eijck; A Cats; E J Kuipers; Y Nio; P Fockens; M J Bruno
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Bhramar Mukherjee; Nabihah Tayob; Fei Wang; Jennifer Sparr; Victoria M Raymond; Prathap Bandipalliam; Elena M Stoffel; Stephen B Gruber; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Five years of prospective screening of high-risk individuals from families with familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Langer; P H Kann; V Fendrich; N Habbe; M Schneider; M Sina; E P Slater; J T Heverhagen; T M Gress; M Rothmund; D K Bartsch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an updated experience.

Authors:  Taylor A Sohn; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Ralph H Hruban; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Kurtis A Campbell; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  215 in total

Review 1.  Familial pancreatic cancer--current knowledge.

Authors:  Detlef K Bartsch; Thomas M Gress; Peter Langer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Targeted screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer: results of a simulation model.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Curtis Heberle; Emily C Dowling; Chung Yin Kong; Angela Tramontano; Katherine E Perzan; William Brugge; Chin Hur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Genome-wide somatic copy number alterations in low-grade PanINs and IPMNs from individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Seung-Mo Hong; Audrey Vincent; Mitsuro Kanda; Julie Leclerc; Noriyuki Omura; Michael Borges; Alison P Klein; Marcia Irene Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasonography: Transition towards the future of gastro-intestinal diseases.

Authors:  Stefania De Lisi; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance: Who, When, and How.

Authors:  Beth Dudley; Randall E Brand
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12

6.  Liver transplant patients have a risk of progression similar to that of sporadic patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lennon; David Victor; Atif Zaheer; Mohammad Reza Ostovaneh; Jessica Jeh; Joanna K Law; Neda Rezaee; Marco Dal Molin; Young Joon Ahn; Wenchuan Wu; Mouen A Khashab; Mohit Girotra; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Matthew J Weiss; Kenzo Hirose; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Andrew Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Vikesh K Singh; Ahmet Gurakar
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Management of a patient diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth Won; Kenneth H Yu; Ali Shamseddine; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Mukherjee; Ali Haydar; Ashwaq El-Olayan; Sally Temraz; Mohamed Naghy; Dorothy Makanjoula; Eileen M O'Reilly; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03

8.  KRAS and guanine nucleotide-binding protein mutations in pancreatic juice collected from the duodenum of patients at high risk for neoplasia undergoing endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  James R Eshleman; Alexis L Norris; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Marija Debeljak; Michael Borges; Colleen Harrington; Elaine Lin; Aaron Brant; Thomas Barkley; J Alejandro Almario; Mark Topazian; James Farrell; Sapna Syngal; Jeffrey H Lee; Jun Yu; Ralph H Hruban; Mitsuro Kanda; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Pancreatic cyst prevalence and the risk of mucin-producing adenocarcinoma in US adults.

Authors:  Timothy B Gardner; Lisa M Glass; Kerrington D Smith; Gregory H Ripple; Richard J Barth; David A Klibansky; Thomas A Colacchio; Michael J Tsapakos; Arief A Suriawinata; Gregory J Tsongalis; J Marc Pipas; Stuart R Gordon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Identifying people at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alison P Klein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.