Literature DB >> 32204012

Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration.

Angshuman Bharadwaz1, Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya2.   

Abstract

The goal of a biomaterial is to support the bone tissue regeneration process at the defect site and eventually degrade in situ and get replaced with the newly generated bone tissue. Nanocomposite biomaterials are a relatively new class of materials that incorporate a biopolymeric and biodegradable matrix structure with bioactive and easily resorbable fillers which are nano-sized. This article is a review of a few polymeric nanocomposite biomaterials which are potential candidates for bone tissue regeneration. These nanocomposites have been broadly classified into two groups viz. natural and synthetic polymer based. Natural polymer-based nanocomposites include materials fabricated through reinforcement of nanoparticles and/or nanofibers in a natural polymer matrix. Several widely used natural biopolymers, such as chitosan (CS), collagen (Col), cellulose, silk fibroin (SF), alginate, and fucoidan, have been reviewed regarding their present investigation on the incorporation of nanomaterial, biocompatibility, and tissue regeneration. Synthetic polymer-based nanocomposites that have been covered in this review include polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA), polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly (lactic acid) (PLA), and polyurethane (PU) based nanocomposites. An array of nanofillers, such as nano hydroxyapatite (nHA), nano zirconia (nZr), nano silica (nSi), silver nano particles (AgNPs), nano titanium dioxide (nTiO2), graphene oxide (GO), that is used widely across the bone tissue regeneration research platform are included in this review with respect to their incorporation into a natural and/or synthetic polymer matrix. The influence of nanofillers on cell viability, both in vitro and in vivo, along with cytocompatibility and new tissue generation has been encompassed in this review. Moreover, nanocomposite material characterization using some commonly used analytical techniques, such as electron microscopy, spectroscopy, diffraction patterns etc., has been highlighted in this review. Biomaterial physical properties, such as pore size, porosity, particle size, and mechanical strength which strongly influences cell attachment, proliferation, and subsequent tissue growth has been covered in this review. This review has been sculptured around a case by case basis of current research that is being undertaken in the field of bone regeneration engineering. The nanofillers induced into the polymeric matrix render important properties, such as large surface area, improved mechanical strength as well as stability, improved cell adhesion, proliferation, and cell differentiation. The selection of nanocomposites is thus crucial in the analysis of viable treatment strategies for bone tissue regeneration for specific bone defects such as craniofacial defects. The effects of growth factor incorporation on the nanocomposite for controlling new bone generation are also important during the biomaterial design phase.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Biomaterial; Bone tissue regeneration; Nanocomposite; Nanofillers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32204012      PMCID: PMC7433904          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  133 in total

Review 1.  Biofabrication with chitosan.

Authors:  Hyunmin Yi; Li-Qun Wu; William E Bentley; Reza Ghodssi; Gary W Rubloff; James N Culver; Gregory F Payne
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Interaction of stem cells with nano hydroxyapatite-fucoidan bionanocomposites for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Ahn Tae Young; Jeong Han Kang; Dong Jun Kang; Jayachandran Venkatesan; Hee Kyung Chang; Ira Bhatnagar; Kwan-Young Chang; Jae-Ho Hwang; Ziad Salameh; Se-Kwon Kim; Hui Taek Kim; Dong Gyu Kim
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 6.953

Review 3.  Sirtuin 1 and sirtuin 3: physiological modulators of metabolism.

Authors:  Ruben Nogueiras; Kirk M Habegger; Nilika Chaudhary; Brian Finan; Alexander S Banks; Marcelo O Dietrich; Tamas L Horvath; David A Sinclair; Paul T Pfluger; Matthias H Tschöp
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Artificial extracellular matrix for biomedical applications: biocompatible and biodegradable poly (tetramethylene ether) glycol/poly (ε-caprolactone diol)-based polyurethanes.

Authors:  Mohsen Shahrousvand; Gity Mir Mohamad Sadeghi; Ali Salimi
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.517

5.  Peptide Self-Assembly for Crafting Functional Biological Materials.

Authors:  John B Matson; R Helen Zha; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.354

6.  Biomimetic nanocomposite based on hydroxyapatite mineralization over chemically modified cellulose nanowhiskers: An active platform for osteoblast proliferation.

Authors:  Elizângela H Fragal; Thelma S P Cellet; Vanessa H Fragal; Maria A Witt; Mychelle V P Companhoni; Tânia Ueda-Nakamura; Rafael Silva; Adley F Rubira
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 6.953

7.  Collagen scaffolds derived from a marine source and their biocompatibility.

Authors:  Eun Song; So Yeon Kim; Taehoon Chun; Hyun-Jung Byun; Young Moo Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications: physicochemical characterization and assessment of rat bone marrow stromal cell viability.

Authors:  Joaquim M Oliveira; Simone S Silva; Patricia B Malafaya; Marcia T Rodrigues; Noriko Kotobuki; Motohiro Hirose; Manuela E Gomes; Joao F Mano; Hajime Ohgushi; Rui L Reis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Efficacy of the biomaterials 3wt%-nanostrontium-hydroxyapatite-enhanced calcium phosphate cement (nanoSr-CPC) and nanoSr-CPC-incorporated simvastatin-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic-acid) microspheres in osteogenesis improvement: An explorative multi-phase experimental in vitro/vivo study.

Authors:  Reza Masaeli; Tahereh Sadat Jafarzadeh Kashi; Rassoul Dinarvand; Vahid Rakhshan; Hossein Shahoon; Behzad Hooshmand; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Majid Raz; Alireza Rajabnejad; Hossein Eslami; Kimia Khoshroo; Mohammadreza Tahriri; Lobat Tayebi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 10.  Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; Elena Jones; Dennis McGonagle; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  53 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  The Intersection of Mechanotransduction and Regenerative Osteogenic Materials.

Authors:  Anthony A Bertrand; Sri Harshini Malapati; Dean T Yamaguchi; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Bone Tissue Engineering through 3D Bioprinting of Bioceramic Scaffolds: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Ahmad Taha Khalaf; Yuanyuan Wei; Jun Wan; Jiang Zhu; Yu Peng; Samiah Yasmin Abdul Kadir; Jamaludin Zainol; Zahraa Oglah; Lijia Cheng; Zheng Shi
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Construction of Tissue-Engineered Bladder Scaffolds with Composite Biomaterials.

Authors:  Wenjiao Li; Na Qi; Tingting Guo; Chao Wang; Ziwei Huang; Zhouyuan Du; Dingwen Xu; Yin Zhao; Hong Tian
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 5.  Polyphenol-Enriched Composite Bone Regeneration Materials: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Kamila Checinska; Maciej Checinski; Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska; Maciej Sikora; Dariusz Chlubek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Ultra-low binder content 3D printed calcium phosphate graphene scaffolds as resorbable, osteoinductive matrices that support bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  Leila Daneshmandi; Brian D Holt; Anne M Arnold; Cato T Laurencin; Stefanie A Sydlik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Biomimetic Composite Scaffold Based on Naturally Derived Biomaterials.

Authors:  Ionela Andreea Neacsu; Adriana Petruta Serban; Adrian Ionut Nicoara; Roxana Trusca; Vladimir Lucian Ene; Florin Iordache
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Investigation of the Potential of Nebivolol Hydrochloride-Loaded Chitosomal Systems for Tissue Regeneration: In Vitro Characterization and In Vivo Assessment.

Authors:  Noha Ibrahim Elsherif; Abdulaziz Mohsen Al-Mahallawi; Abdelfattah Ahmed Abdelkhalek; Rehab Nabil Shamma
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Biocompatible and antibacterial soy protein isolate/quaternized chitosan composite sponges for acute upper gastrointestinal hemostasis.

Authors:  Zijian Wang; MeiFang Ke; Liu He; Qi Dong; Xiao Liang; Jun Rao; Junjie Ai; Chuan Tian; Xinwei Han; Yanan Zhao
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Hydroxyapatite/NELL-1 Nanoparticles Electrospun Fibers for Osteoinduction in Bone Tissue Engineering Application.

Authors:  Hualei Song; Yuntao Zhang; Zihan Zhang; Shijiang Xiong; Xiangrui Ma; Yourui Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.