Literature DB >> 18780358

Macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications: physicochemical characterization and assessment of rat bone marrow stromal cell viability.

Joaquim M Oliveira1, Simone S Silva, Patricia B Malafaya, Marcia T Rodrigues, Noriko Kotobuki, Motohiro Hirose, Manuela E Gomes, Joao F Mano, Hajime Ohgushi, Rui L Reis.   

Abstract

In this work, a new methodology is reported for developing hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds using an organic sacrifice template. The novelty of work consists of possibility of obtaining porous and highly interconnected scaffolds mimicking the sacrificial component. Our purpose consisted of evaluating the physicochemical properties of the HA scaffolds by means of Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) attached with an X-ray detector. The HA scaffolds obtained possess a porosity of approximately 70%, and macropores diameter in the range of 50-600 microm. In contrast, results regarding the microcomputed tomography analysis have demonstrated both high pore uniformity and interconnectivity across the scaffolds. The compressive strength of the HA scaffolds was found to be 30.2 +/- 6.0 MPa. Bioactivity of the HA scaffolds was assessed by immersion into a simulated body fluid solution, in vitro. SEM observations have showed a deposition of apatite on the surface of the HA scaffolds, with a "cauliflower-like" morphology after 1 day, and tend to be more pronounced with the immersion time. The changes in calcium and phosphorus concentration were monitored by inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Cytotoxicity of the HA scaffolds was preliminarily investigated by carrying direct observation of mouse fibroblasts cells (L929 cell-line) death in the inverted microscope, and then cell viability was determined by means of carrying out a MTS assay. Complementarily, a luminescent cell viability assay based on the quantification of adenosine triphosphate was performed using rat bone marrow stromal cells (RBMSCs). A LIVE/DEAD assay and SEM analysis allowed the visualization of the RBMSCs adhesion and proliferation on the surface of the HA scaffolds. According to the results obtained from 3D architecture, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and adhesion tests, it is suggested that HA scaffolds has potential to find applications in bone tissue engineering scaffolding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18780358     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  10 in total

1.  Toward Strong and Tough Glass and Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Repair.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Micro-computed tomography characterization of tissue engineering scaffolds: effects of pixel size and rotation step.

Authors:  Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  The Intersection of Mechanotransduction and Regenerative Osteogenic Materials.

Authors:  Anthony A Bertrand; Sri Harshini Malapati; Dean T Yamaguchi; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Microstructure and chemistry affects apatite nucleation on calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Charlie R Campion; Sara L Ball; Daniel L Clarke; Karin A Hing
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Extracellular Matrix for Craniofacial Regeneration.

Authors:  Ben P Hung; Bilal A Naved; Ethan L Nyberg; Miguel Dias; Christina A Holmes; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-18

Review 6.  Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Angshuman Bharadwaz; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 7.328

7.  Is macroporosity absolutely required for preliminary in vitro bone biomaterial study? A comparison between porous materials and flat materials.

Authors:  Juliana T Y Lee; King L Chow; Kefeng Wang; Wai-Hung Tsang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2011-11-08

Review 8.  Calcium phosphate scaffolds combined with bone morphogenetic proteins or mesenchymal stem cells in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Han Sun; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Collagen as Coating Material for 45S5 Bioactive Glass-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jasmin Hum; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Scaffolding Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications.

Authors:  Sandra Pina; Viviana P Ribeiro; Catarina F Marques; F Raquel Maia; Tiago H Silva; Rui L Reis; J Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.