| Literature DB >> 32438578 |
Ionela Andreea Neacsu1,2, Adriana Petruta Serban3, Adrian Ionut Nicoara1,2, Roxana Trusca2, Vladimir Lucian Ene1,2, Florin Iordache4.
Abstract
This paper proposes the development of a biomimetic compoEntities:
Keywords: biocomposite; bone ash; chitosan; eggshell membrane; gelatin; hydroxyapatite; scaffold
Year: 2020 PMID: 32438578 PMCID: PMC7284724 DOI: 10.3390/polym12051161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1XRD analysis of microwave synthesized hydroxyapatite on ESM.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra for the ESM: (a) before and (b) after the microwave thermal treatment.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of impregnated ESM after microwave thermal treatment (general aspect on the left and an up-close detail on the right).
Figure 4XRD analysis of calcined bovine bone ash (BA).
Figure 5SEM micrographs (a,b) and EDS analysis spectrum (c) of bovine bone ash (BA).
Figure 6SEM micrographs (a-general aspect, b-an up-close detail) of freeze-dried chitosan sample (CS).
Figure 7SEM micrographs (a-general aspect, b-an up-close detail) of freeze-dried chitosan and gelatin sample (CS_Gel).
Figure 8SEM micrographs (a,b) and EDS spectrum (c) of the composite scaffold—Hap(ESM)_CS_Gel_BA.
Figure 9FT-IR spectra for the composite scaffold - HAp(ESM)_CS_Gel_BA.
Figure 10SBF swelling degree evaluation (presented as mean ± S.D. of three replicates).
Figure 11Open porosity % evaluation (presented as mean ± S.D. of 3 replicates); * means a value p < 0.005, obtained by single factor ANOVA test, followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni corrected two tails t-test (n = 3).
Figure 12MTT analysis results after 24, 48 and 72 h for the CS, CS_Gel and HAp(ESM)_CS_Gel_BA porous samples (presented as mean ± S.D. of 3 replicates); * means a value p < 0.0005, ** means a value p < 0.005, *** means a value p < 0.05.
Figure 13GSH analysis results after 24 h for the CS, CS_Gel and HAp(ESM)_CS_Gel_BA porous samples (presented as mean ± S.D. of 3 replicates); * means a value p < 0.005 Control versus CS and CS versus CS_Gel; ** means a value p < 0.05 Control versus HAp(ESM)_CS_Gel_BA.
Figure 14Fluorescence microscopy images of the AFSC interaction with: (a) CS, (b) CS_Gel, (c) HAp(ESM)_CS_Gel_BA, and (d) control sample.