Kimberly S Canter1,2, Gabriela Vega1, Alejandra Perez Ramirez1, Janet E Deatrick3, Anne E Kazak1,2. 1. Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University. 3. Department of Family and Community Nursing, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial intervention studies with parents often have difficulty with regard to participant recruitment, retention, and engagement. Prior to conducting a pilot test of the Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP), a psychosocial eHealth intervention for parents of children with cancer, a qualitative study was designed to preemptively generate strategies to address potential difficulties in these domains. METHODS: Two focus groups and three semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children with cancer. Qualitative data were analyzed using the principles of thematic and content analysis. Themes were generated to describe results and inform the development of concrete recruitment, retention, and engagement strategies to be utilized in future intervention trials. RESULTS: Five themes emerged specific to recruitment, and three themes emerged related to retention and engagement. Parents highlighted a number of important potential recruitment, retention, and engagement strategies, including the importance of flexibility, ease of access and use, intervention timing, and pathways to follow-up care. Themes were linked to actionable recruitment, retention, and engagement strategies which can be utilized in future studies. CONCLUSION: Results from the current study will be utilized when designing future eSCCIP intervention trials and will also be of use to the broader field of psychosocial eHealth intervention research in pediatric psychology. This study also underscores the importance of working with parent stakeholders at all phases of study design and implementation.
OBJECTIVE:Psychosocial intervention studies with parents often have difficulty with regard to participant recruitment, retention, and engagement. Prior to conducting a pilot test of the Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP), a psychosocial eHealth intervention for parents of children with cancer, a qualitative study was designed to preemptively generate strategies to address potential difficulties in these domains. METHODS: Two focus groups and three semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children with cancer. Qualitative data were analyzed using the principles of thematic and content analysis. Themes were generated to describe results and inform the development of concrete recruitment, retention, and engagement strategies to be utilized in future intervention trials. RESULTS: Five themes emerged specific to recruitment, and three themes emerged related to retention and engagement. Parents highlighted a number of important potential recruitment, retention, and engagement strategies, including the importance of flexibility, ease of access and use, intervention timing, and pathways to follow-up care. Themes were linked to actionable recruitment, retention, and engagement strategies which can be utilized in future studies. CONCLUSION: Results from the current study will be utilized when designing future eSCCIP intervention trials and will also be of use to the broader field of psychosocial eHealth intervention research in pediatric psychology. This study also underscores the importance of working with parent stakeholders at all phases of study design and implementation.
Authors: Lori Wiener; Anne E Kazak; Robert B Noll; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Mary Jo Kupst Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Matthew C Hocking; Anne E Kazak; Stephanie Schneider; Darlene Barkman; Lamia P Barakat; Janet A Deatrick Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Olle Jane Z Sahler; Diane L Fairclough; Sean Phipps; Raymond K Mulhern; Michael J Dolgin; Robert B Noll; Ernest R Katz; James W Varni; Donna R Copeland; Robert W Butler Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2005-04
Authors: Lindsay A Jibb; Joseph A Cafazzo; Paul C Nathan; Emily Seto; Bonnie J Stevens; Cynthia Nguyen; Jennifer N Stinson Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Sarah Bergmann; Anja Keitel-Korndörfer; Katharina Herfurth-Majstorovic; Verena Wendt; Annette M Klein; Kai von Klitzing; Matthias Grube Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lori Wiener; Kimberly Canter; Kristin Long; Alexandra M Psihogios; Amanda L Thompson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.955