Literature DB >> 32193817

Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey.

Kenneth D Croes1, Nathan R Jones1, Lori L DuBenske2, Sarina B Schrager2, Jane E Mahoney2, Terry A Little2, Elizabeth S Burnside3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends individualized breast cancer screening for average-risk women before age 50, advised by risk assessment and shared decision-making (SDM). However, the foundational principles of this recommendation that would inform decision support tools for patients and primary care physicians at the point of care have not been codified. Determining the core elements of SDM for breast cancer screening as valued by patients and primary care providers (PCPs) is necessary for implementing effective SDM tools. The aim of this study is to affirm core elements of SDM in the context of clinical interactions, through a Delphi consensus process.
METHODS: A Delphi was conducted with 30 participants (10 women aged 40-49, 10 PCPs, and 10 healthcare decision scientists), to codify core elements of breast cancer screening SDM. The criterion for establishing consensus was a threshold of 80% agreement. The Delphi concluded with an 83% response rate.
RESULTS: Of 48 items fielded, 44 met the threshold on the high-importance end of the response scale and were accepted as core elements. Core elements across three thematic categories-information delivery and patient education, interpersonal clinician-patient communication, and framework of the decision-received panelists' support in nearly equal measure. Panelists unanimously agreed that SDM should include provision of clearly understandable information, including that of personal breast cancer risk factors, and benefits and harms of mammography screening, and that PCPs should convey they are listening, knowledgeable, and demonstrate cultural sensitivity. DISCUSSION: This research codifies the core elements of SDM for mammography in women 40-49, augmenting the evidence to inform discussions between patients and physicians. These core elements of SDM have the potential to operationalize SDM for breast cancer screening in an effort to improve public health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi consensus; breast cancer screening; decision-making; health communication; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32193817      PMCID: PMC7280383          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  28 in total

1.  Convergence and Divergence Around Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Albert L Siu; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Michael L LeFevre
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Point: Mammography, breast cancer, and overdiagnosis: the truth versus the whole truth versus nothing but the truth.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Appropriateness: the next frontier.

Authors:  R H Brook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-22

4.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

Authors:  A Fink; J Kosecoff; M Chassin; R H Brook
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Mick P Couper; Eleanor Singer; Peter A Ubel; Sonja Ziniel; Floyd J Fowler; Carrie A Levin; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Richard Thomson; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Amy Lloyd; Paul Kinnersley; Emma Cording; Dave Tomson; Carole Dodd; Stephen Rollnick; Adrian Edwards; Michael Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Helping someone with problem drug use: a Delphi consensus study of consumers, carers, and clinicians.

Authors:  Anna H Kingston; Amy J Morgan; Anthony F Jorm; Kate Hall; Laura M Hart; Claire M Kelly; Dan I Lubman
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rym Boulkedid; Hendy Abdoul; Marine Loustau; Olivier Sibony; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Online information about mammography screening in Italy from 2014 to 2021.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Lucia Abagnale; Angela Avitabile
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"

Authors:  Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia; Christine M Gunn
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-01-17

3.  Essential elements to "design for dissemination" within a research network-a modified Delphi study of the Community-Academic Aging Research Network (CAARN).

Authors:  Maria C Mora Pinzon; Shannon Myers; Jill Renken; Erin Eggert; Betty Chewning; Jane E Mahoney
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-02-12

4.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Breast Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Aid Utilized Within the Primary Care Clinical Encounter.

Authors:  Lori DuBenske; Viktoriya Ovsepyan; Terry Little; Sarina Schrager; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-07-31

5.  Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Ashley J Housten; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2021-07-20

6.  Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique.

Authors:  María José Hernández-Leal; Núria Codern-Bové; María José Pérez-Lacasta; Angels Cardona; Carmen Vidal-Lancis; Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.