Literature DB >> 6380323

Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

A Fink, J Kosecoff, M Chassin, R H Brook.   

Abstract

Consensus methods are being used increasingly to solve problems in medicine and health. Their main purpose is to define levels of agreement on controversial subjects. Advocates suggest that, when properly employed, consensus strategies can create structured environments in which experts are given the best available information, allowing their solutions to problems to be more justifiable and credible than otherwise. This paper surveys the characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) and provides guidelines for those who want to use the techniques. Among the concerns these guidelines address are selecting problems, choosing members for consensus panels, specifying acceptable levels of agreement, properly using empirical data, obtaining professional and political support, and disseminating results.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6380323      PMCID: PMC1651783          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  The future of pathology: a Delphi study by pathology department chairmen.

Authors:  F Goodale; G W Gander
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1976-11

2.  Statistical methods for reliability and validity testing: an application to nominal group judgments in health care.

Authors:  S D Jorn; J W Williamson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Formulating priorities for quality assurance activity. Description of a method and its application.

Authors:  J W Williamson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Medical assessment by a Delphi group opinion technic.

Authors:  A V Milholland; S G Wheeler; J J Heieck
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies.

Authors:  A H Van de Ven; A L Delbecq
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The NIH consensus-development program and the assessment of health-care technologies: the first two years.

Authors:  S Perry; J T Kalberer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department.

Authors:  K G Loughlin; L F Moore
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1979-02

8.  Measurement of task delegations among nurses by nominal group process analysis.

Authors:  V M Trivedi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Spending priorities in Kent: a Delphi study.

Authors:  J R Charlton; D L Patrick; G Matthews; P A West
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities.

Authors:  I Moscovice; P Armstrong; S Shortell; R Bennett
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.265

View more
  386 in total

1.  Doctor-staffed ambulance helicopters: to what extent can the general practitioner replace the anaesthesiologist?

Authors:  R Hotvedt; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?

Authors:  D Schopper; A M Torres; J Pereira; C Ammon; N Cuende; M Alonso; A Baylin; A Ronchi; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography. Cooperative study between the ASNR, ASITN, and the SCVIR. American Society of Neuroradiology. American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence.

Authors:  S Sauerland; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Bridging decision analytic modelling with a cross-sectional study. Application to Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M J Nuijten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Formal consensus and consultation: a qualitative method for development of a guideline for dementia.

Authors:  H Trickey; I Harvey; G Wilcock; D Sharp
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

Review 7.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M N Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

8.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

Review 9.  The design of decisions: Matching clinical decision support recommendations to Nielsen's design heuristics.

Authors:  Kristen Miller; Muge Capan; Danielle Weldon; Yaman Noaiseh; Rebecca Kowalski; Rachel Kraft; Sanford Schwartz; William S Weintraub; Ryan Arnold
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Adherence to consensus-based diagnosis and treatment guidelines in adult soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a French prospective population-based study.

Authors:  S Mathoulin-Pélissier; C Chevreau; C Bellera; E Bauvin; M Savès; P Grosclaude; S Albert; J Goddard; S Le Guellec; M Delannes; B N Bui; J Mendiboure; E Stoeckle; J M Coindre; G Kantor; M Kind; A Cowppli-Bony; S Hoppe; A Italiano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.