Literature DB >> 20839699

The transverse acetabular ligament: optimizing version.

David Beverland1.   

Abstract

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), excessive retroversion is associated with posterior instability, anterior impingement, and resultant groin pain. Excessive anteversion can lead to anterior instability and posterior impingement. The transverse acetabular ligament straddles the inferior limit of the bony acetabulum. It is a strong load-bearing structure and, in the normal hip, in association with the labrum, provides part of the load-bearing surface for the femoral head. It is our hypothesis that the transverse acetabular ligament defines normal version for the acetabulum. In Belfast, we found that using the transverse acetabular ligament helped reduce our primary dislocation rate from 3.7% to 1%. The key is good intraoperative exposure. A grading of 1 to 4 was based on 1000 consecutive cases: (1) normal transverse acetabular ligament easily visible on exposure of the acetabulum, 49%; (2) covered by soft tissue, 35.1%--cleared by blunt dissection; (3) covered by osteophytes, 15.6%--cleared using an acetabular reamer; (4) no transverse acetabular ligament identified, 0.3%. As can be seen, the transverse acetabular ligament is only immediately visible in 49% of cases. In the other 51%, soft tissue or bone must be cleared to define the ligament. The advantages of the transverse acetabular ligament are many. It is independent of patient positioning. The cup version can be individualized by the patient. The surgeon can avoid estimating version angle of 15° to 20° intraoperatively. It is easy to teach and consistently present. It is valuable in minimally invasive surgery. Using the transverse acetabular ligament provides an acceptable dislocation rate with the posterior approach. If the cup is cradled by the transverse acetabular ligament, it helps restore acetabular joint center. However, the transverse acetabular ligament does not help with inclination. We recommend 35° of operative inclination when using the posterior approach. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839699     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Deepu Bhaskar; Asim Rajpura; Tim Board
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  A Geometric Model to Determine Patient-Specific Cup Anteversion Based on Pelvic Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Grant Sutter; Samuel S Wellman; Michael P Bolognesi; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-05-02

4.  Mechanical and Anatomical Alignment Guide Techniques Are Superior to Freehand in Achieving Target Orientation of an Acetabular Component.

Authors:  Robert Bruce-Brand; Paul Magill; Christopher O'Neill; Paul Karayiannis; Janet Hill; David Beverland
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-08

5.  Two stage cementation and screw augmentation of large acetabular defects in low demand patients: Early results and surgical technique.

Authors:  Mohamed Mussa; Varun Dewan; Eric Isbister
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 6.  Primary total hip arthroplasty: Staying out of trouble intraoperatively.

Authors:  Shahryar Noordin; Riaz Lakdawala; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 7.  Total hip arthroplasty planning.

Authors:  Alessandro Colombi; Daniele Schena; Claudio Carlo Castelli
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-11-01

8.  Restoring global offset and lower limb length with a 3 offset option double-tapered stem.

Authors:  Stefano Biggi; Lorenzo Banci; Riccardo Tedino; Andrea Capuzzo; Gabriele Cattaneo; Stefano Tornago; Andrea Camera
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.