Literature DB >> 17356137

High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects.

E H van Haaren1, I C Heyligers, F G M Alexander, P I J M Wuisman.   

Abstract

We reviewed the results of 71 revisions of the acetabular component in total hip replacement, using impaction of bone allograft. The mean follow-up was 7.2 years (1.6 to 9.7). All patients were assessed according to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification of bone loss, the amount of bone graft required, thickness of the graft layer, signs of graft incorporation and use of augmentation. A total of 20 acetabular components required re-revision for aseptic loosening, giving an overall survival of 72% (95% CI, 54.4 to 80.5). Of these failures, 14 (70%) had an AAOS type III or IV bone defect. In the failed group, poor radiological and histological graft incorporation was seen. These results suggest that impaction allografting in acetabular revision with severe bone defects may have poorer results than have previously been reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356137     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  48 in total

1.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul T H Lee; Guy Raz; Oleg A Safir; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CORR Insights(®): THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

6.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 7.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chirayu Dwivedi; Sandeep Gokhale; Hyun Gon Khim; Jeon Keon Oh; Won Yong Shon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-09-06

9.  Supercharging allografts with mesenchymal stem cells in the operating room during hip revision.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Kazuo Kaneko; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Christine Livesey; Michael R Whitehouse; Steve Eastaugh-Waring; Gordon C Bannister; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.