Literature DB >> 32189218

The impact of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on coughing distance: implications on its use during the novel coronavirus disease outbreak.

Ne-Hooi Will Loh1, Yanni Tan2, Juvel Taculod3, Billy Gorospe3, Analine S Teope4, Jyoti Somani5, Addy Yong Hui Tan2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32189218      PMCID: PMC7090637          DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01634-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   6.713


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 threatens healthcare resources throughout the world. This is particularly true for the patients who develop moderate to severe respiratory failure and require oxygen supplementation devices such as high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).1 The HFNC uses humidification to allow the delivery of up to 100% oxygen at flow rates of up to 60 L·min−1; however, there is a concern this may aerosolize respiratory tract pathogens. The World Health Organization (WHO) released interim guidance on the management of severe respiratory infection when COVID-19 is suspected.2 Using evidence from several recently published studies,2,3 WHO guidance proffers that HFNC do not create wide-spread dispersion of exhaled air and therefore should be associated with low risk of transmission of respiratory viruses. This document also recommends wearing a standard medical face mask if the healthcare worker is within 2 m of the patient and there is a physical bed separation of at least 1 m. We carried out an experiment to simulate a patient coughing while using HFNC to assess the maximum distance of droplet dispersion. Formal ethics approval was waived by the Office of Human Research Protection Programme, National Healthcare Group, Singapore. The authors (n = 5), with no history of lung disease, participated. All gargled 10 mL of diluted red then blue food dye. They were then seated with their mouths approximately 1.30 m from the floor, inhaled to vital capacity, and coughed with an open mouth. Each participant coughed twice and the furthest distance that a visible food dye droplet travelled on the ground was measured. The process was repeated while wearing a well-fitting HFNC (2004F7015 High/Low Blender, Bio-Med USA and Optiflo, Fisher Paykel Healthcare New Zealand) at 60 L·min−1 flow. We showed that in these healthy volunteers, cough-generated droplets spread to a mean (standard deviation) distance of 2.48 (1.03) m at baseline and 2.91 (1.09) m with HFNC. A maximum cough distance of 4.50 m was reported when using HFNC (Table). Droplet dispersion distances during simulated coughing HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula; SD = standard deviation Hui et al. 3 used a simulator model and a smoke-laser illumination technique to investigate the dispersion of droplets amplified by HFNC. They showed that when HFNC flow rates were increased from 10–60 L·min−1, non-cough exhaled air distances (in the forward direction) increased from 6.5 to 17.2 cm, and up to 62 cm (in the lateral direction). It is uncertain if such short distances are accurate in patients who are coughing. Leung et al.4 found no evidence of increased surrounding surface contamination when using HFNC in patients with gram negative bacterial pneumonia. Nevertheless, extrapolating findings from patients with bacterial pneumonia to those with viral pneumonia may not be rational. In our study, four of the five volunteers’ cough droplets travelled further than the WHO-recommended 2 m safe exclusion zone. Overall, the distance of droplet dispersion from coughing increased by an average of 0.42 m with HFNC. Using the other studies3,4 as a guide, the safest way to use HFNC during the current COVID-19 outbreak is to embrace the potential of nosocomial airborne transmission and ensure HFNC devices are at least used in single occupancy rooms or negative pressure airborne isolation rooms5 when possible. Healthcare workers caring for those using HFNC should be wearing full airborne personal protective equipment (i.e., N95 mask or equivalent, gown, gloves, goggles, hair covers, and face shield or hoods).
Table

Droplet dispersion distances during simulated coughing

ParticipantDistance without HFNC (m)Distance with HFNC (m)Difference in distance (m)
Female, 159 cm, 46 kg1.031.530.50
Male, 171 cm, 76 kg2.333.170.84
Male, 171 cm, 79 kg3.904.500.60
Male, 170 cm, 70 kg2.432.41− 0.02
Female, 161 cm, 71 kg2.732.920.19
Mean (SD) values2.48 (1.03)2.91 (1.09)0.42 (0.34)

HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula; SD = standard deviation

  3 in total

1.  Exhaled air dispersion during high-flow nasal cannula therapy versus CPAP via different masks.

Authors:  David S Hui; Benny K Chow; Thomas Lo; Owen T Y Tsang; Fanny W Ko; Susanna S Ng; Tony Gin; Matthew T V Chan
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 2.  Active case finding with case management: the key to tackling the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Zhongjie Li; Qiulan Chen; Luzhao Feng; Lance Rodewald; Yinyin Xia; Hailiang Yu; Ruochen Zhang; Zhijie An; Wenwu Yin; Wei Chen; Ying Qin; Zhibin Peng; Ting Zhang; Daxin Ni; Jinzhao Cui; Qing Wang; Xiaokun Yang; Muli Zhang; Xiang Ren; Dan Wu; Xiaojin Sun; Yuanqiu Li; Lei Zhou; Xiaopeng Qi; Tie Song; George F Gao; Zijian Feng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Personal protective equipment (PPE) for both anesthesiologists and other airway managers: principles and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shannon L Lockhart; Laura V Duggan; Randy S Wax; Stephan Saad; Hilary P Grocott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.713

  3 in total
  38 in total

1.  Impact of an Improvised System on Preserving Oxygen Supplies in Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  William Poncin; Lia Baudet; Gregory Reychler; Frédéric Duprez; Giuseppe Liistro; Leila Belkhir; Lucie Pothen; Halil Yildiz; Jean-Cyr Yombi; Julien De Greef
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Clinical, molecular, and epidemiological characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Esteban Ortiz-Prado; Katherine Simbaña-Rivera; Lenin Gómez-Barreno; Mario Rubio-Neira; Linda P Guaman; Nikolaos C Kyriakidis; Claire Muslin; Ana María Gómez Jaramillo; Carlos Barba-Ostria; Doménica Cevallos-Robalino; Hugo Sanches-SanMiguel; Luis Unigarro; Rasa Zalakeviciute; Naomi Gadian; Andrés López-Cortés
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 3.  COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: fears, facts and preventive measures.

Authors:  Israel Oluwasegun Ayenigbara; Olasunkanmi Rowland Adeleke; George Omoniyi Ayenigbara; Joseph Sunday Adegboro; Oluwaseyi Oye Olofintuyi
Journal:  Germs       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Outcomes and clinical practice in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit in Montréal, Canada: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Su Yang; Jed Lipes; Sandra Dial; Blair Schwartz; Denny Laporta; Evan Wong; Craig Baldry; Paul Warshawsky; Patricia McMillan; David Hornstein; Michel de Marchie; Dev Jayaraman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Analysis of the influencing factors of the clinical effect of respiratory humidifier in treating AIDS complicated with severe Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.

Authors:  Qi Cao; Wei Zeng; Jingmin Nie; Yongjun Ye; Yanchao Chen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 6.  Air Quality in Dental Care Facilities: Update to Current Management and Control Strategies Implementing New Technologies: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ioannis Tzoutzas; Ioannis Karoussis; Helena C Maltezou
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  High-flow Nasal Cannula therapy: A feasible treatment for vulnerable elderly COVID-19 patients in the wards.

Authors:  Job van Steenkiste; Michael C van Herwerden; Dolf Weller; Christiaan J van den Bout; Rikje Ruiter; Jan G den Hollander; Rachida El Moussaoui; Gert T Verhoeven; Charlotte van Noord; Marinus A van den Dorpel
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Oxygen therapy strategies and techniques to treat hypoxia in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  B Jiang; H Wei
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.784

9.  Design and evaluation of a portable negative pressure hood with HEPA filtration to protect health care workers treating patients with transmissible respiratory infections.

Authors:  Hai-Thien Phu; Yensil Park; Austin J Andrews; Ian Marabella; Asish Abraham; Reid Mimmack; Bernard A Olson; Jonathan Chaika; Eugene Floersch; Mojca Remskar; Janet R Hume; Gwenyth A Fischer; Kumar Belani; Christopher J Hogan
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.303

Review 10.  Safe extubation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Aaron W Kangas-Dick; Bruce Swearingen; Elias Wan; Kabu Chawla; Ory Wiesel
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.