| Literature DB >> 32188136 |
Amaranta Focardi1, Martin Ostrowski2, Kirianne Goossen3, Mark V Brown3,4, Ian Paulsen1.
Abstract
Virus- andEntities:
Keywords: Tasman Sea; bacteriophage; east Australian current; metagenome; metaviromes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32188136 PMCID: PMC7150976 DOI: 10.3390/v12030317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Location of the sampling sites along the east coast of Australia: Transect South (Tr.S), Transect middle (Tr.M), the Lagrangian drift along the EAC (EAC drift), the northern samples (SN) and the samples collected inside a warm core eddy (WCE). Data for the 8-day composite average surface seawater temperature on a 4 km resolution were obtained from the Australian Ocean Data Network portal (https://portal.aodn.org.au/) for the period September 2016. Sampling sites and transects are highlighted. Colours of the CTD deployments are related to the availability of metagenomes for either the microbial fraction (white) (>0.2 µm) or the microbial (>0.2 µm) and viral fraction (<0.2 µm) (red).
Figure 2Depth distribution of novel and known bacteriophage contigs. Similarity to previously sequenced viromes and metagenomes was assigned with a BLASTn analysis against the IMG/VR database (2018) using a similarity cut-off of >60% genes with >70% nucleotide identity. Similarity categories: N (novel: shared < 20% genes), LS (low similarity: share > 20% and < 60% genes), S (similar: share >60% and < 80% genes), K (known phage: share > 80% of the genes). Contig abundance was normalized based on read counts.
Figure 3(a) Hierarchical clustering of sites based on the normalized abundance of large viral contigs (n = 624). A SIMPROF analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index was used to identify seven significant clusters. The relative abundance of viral contigs was normalized based on reads count and square root transformed. Sites are color-coded bases on significant clusters. VS_TS = Virome and surface Tasman samples, TS = Tasman Sea surface and DCM, EAC and EAC_2 = EAC, Tr_M and S.N, OS = Offshore samples from Tr_M, MP = Mesopelagic samples (500 m), BP = Bathypelagic samples and virome samples. (b) Non-metric multidimensional scaling plot of the bacteriophage diversity observed in the first two axes for all the stations and depths. Samples are color-coded based on hierarchal clusters calculated from the SIMPROF test (Clustsig). Shapes are related to different depth ranges. (c) Venn diagram showing the distribution of shared and unique viral contigs in the microbial fraction (>0.2 µm) (INv04014d0, IN16v04016d0) and the viral fraction (<0.2 µm) (INv04014d0vir, IN16v04016d0vir), from the same sites.
Figure 4Relative proportion of sequence reads mapped to taxonomically assigned viral contigs at the family level in the different clusters. Taxonomy was assigned with Kaiju against the NCBI virus database (December 2019).
Figure 5Community composition for the different clusters of the 50 most abundant prokaryotic taxa in the metagenomes represented at the family level. Taxonomy was estimated from SSU rRNA genes (bacteria and archaea), reconstructed from shotgun metagenomes using phyloFlash.
Figure 6(a) Differential distribution of the 80 most abundant Pfam in the different clusters of the euphotic zone. Function was assigned with Interproscan (v.5). Pfam descriptions are colour coded based on corresponding functional categories [38]. Samples are grouped based on hierarchal clusters, calculated using the SIMPROF test (Clustsig). Size of the bubble is relative to Pfam abundance. (b) Venn diagram illustrating the differential distribution of shared and unique annotated viral genes between the aphotic and the euphotic zone. (c) Differential distribution of the 17 most abundant Pfam in the aphotic zone. (d) Log scaled depth distribution of integrase genes from the viral database.
Figure 7Canonical correspondence analysis (Vegan) plot of the main (1770) virus contigs distribution for the different sites. Samples are colour coded based on cluster assigned with hierarchical cluster analysis (SIMPROF). Salinity—Sal, temperature—T, mix layer depth—Zm, silicate—Si, oxygen—O, nitrite/nitrate—NOx, nitrite—N, phosphate—P.