Literature DB >> 32184217

Kinetics of Nuclear Uptake and Site-Specific DNA Cleavage during CRISPR-Directed Gene Editing in Solid Tumor Cells.

Kelly Banas1,2, Natalia Rivera-Torres1, Pawel Bialk1, Byung-Chun Yoo1, Eric B Kmiec3,2.   

Abstract

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-directed gene editing is approaching clinical implementation in cancer. Thus, it is imperative to define the molecular framework upon which safe and efficacious therapeutic strategies can be built. Two important reaction parameters include the biological time frame within which the CRISPR/Cas complex enters the nucleus and executes gene editing, and the method of discrimination that the CRISPR/Cas complex utilizes to target tumor cell, but not normal cell, genomes. We are developing CRISPR-directed gene editing for the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma focusing on disabling Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor-Like (NRF2), a transcription factor that regulates chemoresistance and whose genetic disruption would enhance chemosensitivity. In this report, we define the time frame of cellular events that surround the initialization of CRISPR-directed gene editing as a function of the nuclear penetration and the execution of NRF2 gene disruption. We also identify a unique protospacer adjacent motif that facilitates site-specific cleavage of the NRF2 gene present only in tumor genomes. IMPLICATIONS: Our results begin to set a scientifically meritorious foundation for the exploitation of CRISPR-directed gene editing as an augmentative therapy for lung cancer and other solid tumors. VISUAL OVERVIEW: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/18/6/891/F1.large.jpg. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32184217      PMCID: PMC7508193          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-1208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  45 in total

Review 1.  NRF2 and the Hallmarks of Cancer.

Authors:  Montserrat Rojo de la Vega; Eli Chapman; Donna D Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 2.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  CRISPR-Directed Gene Editing Catalyzes Precise Gene Segment Replacement In Vitro Enabling a Novel Method for Multiplex Site-Directed Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Brett M Sansbury; Amanda M Wagner; Gabi Tarcic; Shaul Barth; Erez Nitzan; Romy Goldfus; Michael Vidne; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-04

4.  Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil.

Authors:  Martin Reck; Joachim von Pawel; Petr Zatloukal; Rodryg Ramlau; Vera Gorbounova; Vera Hirsh; Natasha Leighl; Jörg Mezger; Venice Archer; Nicola Moore; Christian Manegold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of KEAP1- and NFE2L2-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC).

Authors:  Rieke Frank; Matthias Scheffler; Reinhard Büttner; Jürgen Wolf; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Michaela A Ihle; Anna Kron; Michael Rauer; Frank Ueckeroth; Katharina König; Sebastian Michels; Rieke Fischer; Anna Eisert; Jana Fassunke; Carina Heydt; Monika Serke; Yon-Dschun Ko; Ulrich Gerigk; Thomas Geist; Britta Kaminsky; Lukas C Heukamp; Mathieu Clement-Ziza
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Modification of platinum sensitivity by KEAP1/NRF2 signals in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yijun Tian; Kongming Wu; Qian Liu; Na Han; Li Zhang; Qian Chu; Yuan Chen
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 17.388

7.  Insertional Mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Gene Editing in Cells Targeted for Point Mutation Repair Directed by Short Single-Stranded DNA Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Natalia Rivera-Torres; Kelly Banas; Pawel Bialk; Kevin M Bloh; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Programmable Genome Editing Tools and their Regulation for Efficient Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Tuhin Kumar Guha; Alvan Wai; Georg Hausner
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 7.271

9.  Functional Gene Knockout of NRF2 Increases Chemosensitivity of Human Lung Cancer A549 Cells In Vitro and in a Xenograft Mouse Model.

Authors:  Pawel Bialk; Yichen Wang; Kelly Banas; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 7.200

10.  Efficient genome editing in the mouse brain by local delivery of engineered Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes.

Authors:  Brett T Staahl; Madhurima Benekareddy; Claire Coulon-Bainier; Ashwin A Banfal; Stephen N Floor; Jennifer K Sabo; Cole Urnes; Gabriela Acevedo Munares; Anirvan Ghosh; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  2 in total

1.  Homology directed correction, a new pathway model for point mutation repair catalyzed by CRISPR-Cas.

Authors:  Brett M Sansbury; Amanda M Hewes; Olivia M Tharp; Sophia B Masciarelli; Salma Kaouser; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Exon skipping induced by CRISPR-directed gene editing regulates the response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Kelly Banas; Shirin Modarai; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Byung-Chun Yoo; Pawel A Bialk; Connor Barrett; Mona Batish; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.184

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.