Literature DB >> 30998096

CRISPR-Directed Gene Editing Catalyzes Precise Gene Segment Replacement In Vitro Enabling a Novel Method for Multiplex Site-Directed Mutagenesis.

Brett M Sansbury1,2, Amanda M Wagner2, Gabi Tarcic3, Shaul Barth3, Erez Nitzan3, Romy Goldfus3, Michael Vidne3, Eric B Kmiec1,2.   

Abstract

Much of our understanding of eukaryotic genes function comes from studies of the activity of their mutated forms or allelic variability. Mutations have helped elucidate how members of an intricate pathway function in relation to each other and how they operate in the context of the regulatory circuitry that surrounds them. A PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis technique is often used to engineer these variants. While these tools are efficient, they are not without significant limitations, most notably off-site mutagenesis, limited scalability, and lack of multiplexing capabilities. To overcome many of these limitations, we now describe a novel method for the introduction of both simple and complex gene mutations in plasmid DNA by using in vitro DNA editing. A specifically designed pair of CRISPR-Cas12a ribonucleoprotein complexes are used to execute site-specific double-strand breaks on plasmid DNA, enabling the excision of a defined DNA fragment. Donor DNA replacement is catalyzed by a mammalian cell-free extract through microhomology annealing of short regions of single-stranded DNA complementarity; we term this method CRISPR-directed DNA mutagenesis (CDM). The products of CDM are plasmids bearing precise donor fragments with specific modifications and CDM could be used for mutagenesis in larger constructs such as Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BACs) or Yeast Artificial Chromosome (YACs). We further show that this reaction can be multiplexed so that product molecules with multiple site-specific mutations and site-specific deletions can be generated in the same in vitro reaction mixture. Importantly, the CDM method produces fewer unintended mutations in the target gene as compared to the standard site-directed mutagenesis assay; CDM produces no unintended mutations throughout the plasmid backbone. Lastly, this system recapitulates the multitude of reactions that take place during CRISPR-directed gene editing in mammalian cells and affords the opportunity to study the mechanism of action of CRISPR-directed gene editing in mammalian cells by visualizing a multitude of genetic products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30998096     DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2018.0054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CRISPR J        ISSN: 2573-1599


  9 in total

1.  A single digestion, single-stranded oligonucleotide mediated PCR-independent site-directed mutagenesis method.

Authors:  Mengjie Dong; Fei Wang; Qingqing Li; Rui Han; Aitao Li; Chao Zhai; Lixin Ma
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Homology directed correction, a new pathway model for point mutation repair catalyzed by CRISPR-Cas.

Authors:  Brett M Sansbury; Amanda M Hewes; Olivia M Tharp; Sophia B Masciarelli; Salma Kaouser; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Kinetics of Nuclear Uptake and Site-Specific DNA Cleavage during CRISPR-Directed Gene Editing in Solid Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Kelly Banas; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Pawel Bialk; Byung-Chun Yoo; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  Understanding the diversity of genetic outcomes from CRISPR-Cas generated homology-directed repair.

Authors:  Brett M Sansbury; Amanda M Hewes; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-12-06

5.  Deconvolution of Complex DNA Repair (DECODR): Establishing a Novel Deconvolution Algorithm for Comprehensive Analysis of CRISPR-Edited Sanger Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Kevin Bloh; Rohan Kanchana; Pawel Bialk; Kelly Banas; Zugui Zhang; Byung-Chun Yoo; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 6.  A Consensus Model of Homology-Directed Repair Initiated by CRISPR/Cas Activity.

Authors:  Kevin Bloh; Natalia Rivera-Torres
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Exon skipping induced by CRISPR-directed gene editing regulates the response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Kelly Banas; Shirin Modarai; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Byung-Chun Yoo; Pawel A Bialk; Connor Barrett; Mona Batish; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.184

8.  Modeling pediatric AML FLT3 mutations using CRISPR/Cas12a- mediated gene editing.

Authors:  Natalia Rivera-Torres; Kelly Banas; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-08-20

9.  The Diversity of Genetic Outcomes from CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing is Regulated by the Length of the Symmetrical Donor DNA Template.

Authors:  Amanda M Hewes; Brett M Sansbury; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.