Literature DB >> 29615460

Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of KEAP1- and NFE2L2-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC).

Rieke Frank1,2, Matthias Scheffler1,2, Reinhard Büttner2,3, Jürgen Wolf4,2, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse2,3, Michaela A Ihle2,3, Anna Kron1,3, Michael Rauer5,6, Frank Ueckeroth2,3, Katharina König2,3, Sebastian Michels1,2, Rieke Fischer1,2, Anna Eisert1,2, Jana Fassunke2,3, Carina Heydt2,3, Monika Serke2,7, Yon-Dschun Ko2,8, Ulrich Gerigk2,9, Thomas Geist2,10, Britta Kaminsky2,11, Lukas C Heukamp2,3, Mathieu Clement-Ziza5,6.   

Abstract

Purpose:KEAP1 and NFE2L2 mutations are associated with impaired prognosis in a variety of cancers and with squamous cell carcinoma formation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about frequency, histology dependence, molecular and clinical presentation as well as response to systemic treatment in NSCLC.Experimental Design: Tumor tissue of 1,391 patients with NSCLC was analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical and pathologic characteristics, survival, and treatment outcome of patients with KEAP1 or NFE2L2 mutations were assessed.
Results: KEAP1 mutations occurred with a frequency of 11.3% (n = 157) and NFE2L2 mutations with a frequency of 3.5% (n = 49) in NSCLC patients. In the vast majority of patients, both mutations did not occur simultaneously. KEAP1 mutations were found mainly in adenocarcinoma (AD; 72%), while NFE2L2 mutations were more common in squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC; 59%). KEAP1 mutations were spread over the whole protein, whereas NFE2L2 mutations were clustered in specific hotspot regions. In over 80% of the patients both mutations co-occurred with other cancer-related mutations, among them also targetable aberrations like activating EGFR mutations or MET amplification. Both patient groups showed different patterns of metastases, stage distribution and performance state. No patient with KEAP1 mutation had a response on systemic treatment in first-, second-, or third-line setting. Of NFE2L2-mutated patients, none responded to second- or third-line therapy.Conclusions:KEAP1- and NFE2L2-mutated NSCLC patients represent a highly heterogeneous patient cohort. Both are associated with different histologies and usually are found together with other cancer-related, partly targetable, genetic aberrations. In addition, both markers seem to be predictive for chemotherapy resistance. Clin Cancer Res; 24(13); 3087-96. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29615460     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  38 in total

Review 1.  Clinical utility of tumor mutational burden in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Lizza E Hendriks; Etienne Rouleau; Benjamin Besse
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12

2.  Chronic arsenic exposure enhances metastatic potential via NRF2-mediated upregulation of SOX9.

Authors:  Cody J Schmidlin; Tao Zeng; Pengfei Liu; Yongyi Wei; Matthew Dodson; Eli Chapman; Donna D Zhang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Homologous recombination and DNA repair mutations in patients treated with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dwight H Owen; Terence M Williams; Erin M Bertino; Xiaokui Mo; Amy Webb; Catherine Schweitzer; Tom Liu; Sameek Roychowdhury; Cynthia D Timmers; Gregory A Otterson
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Role of KEAP1/NFE2L2 Mutations in the Chemotherapeutic Response of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Youngtae Jeong; Jessica A Hellyer; Henning Stehr; Ngoc T Hoang; Xiaomin Niu; Millie Das; Sukhmani K Padda; Kavitha Ramchandran; Joel W Neal; Heather Wakelee; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Kinetics of Nuclear Uptake and Site-Specific DNA Cleavage during CRISPR-Directed Gene Editing in Solid Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Kelly Banas; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Pawel Bialk; Byung-Chun Yoo; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  "Keaping" a lid on lung cancer: the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway.

Authors:  Sarah A Best; Kate D Sutherland
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Importance of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in NSCLC: Is it a possible biomarker?

Authors:  Raúl Barrera-Rodríguez
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-09-05

8.  The Oncogenic Action of NRF2 Depends on De-glycation by Fructosamine-3-Kinase.

Authors:  Viraj R Sanghvi; Josef Leibold; Marco Mina; Prathibha Mohan; Marjan Berishaj; Zhuoning Li; Matthew M Miele; Nathalie Lailler; Chunying Zhao; Elisa de Stanchina; Agnes Viale; Leila Akkari; Scott W Lowe; Giovanni Ciriello; Ronald C Hendrickson; Hans-Guido Wendel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 66.850

9.  NRF2: KEAPing Tumors Protected.

Authors:  Ray Pillai; Makiko Hayashi; Anastasia-Maria Zavitsanou; Thales Papagiannakopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 38.272

10.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Keap1 mRNA Expression for Lung Cancer Based on Microarray and Clinical Information from Oncomine Database.

Authors:  Guang-Ya Liu; Wei Zhang; Xu-Chi Chen; Wen-Juan Wu; Shi-Qian Wan
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.