| Literature DB >> 32182905 |
Daniela Giorgio1, Adriana Di Trana1, Paola Di Gregorio1, Andrea Rando1, Marcella Avondo2, Adriana Bonanno3, Bernardo Valenti4, Antonino Di Grigoli3.
Abstract
Forty late-lactation Girgentana goats were used to study the effect of diets fed ad libitum and αS1-casein (CSN1S1) genotype on redox balance. The goats genotyped at CSN1S1 locus (A/A, A/F) were subjected to four feeding treatments different for percentage inclusion of dry and fresh forage: DAF100 (98% of Dry Alfalfa Forage), DAF65 (65% of Dry Alfalfa Forage), FSF100 (100% of Fresh Sulla Forage) and FSF65 (65% of Fresh Sulla Forage). Blood samples were analyzed for superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity, reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs), biological antioxidant potential (BAP) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA), albumin, glucose and cholesterol contents. The oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated as percentage ratio of ROMs to BAP. Redox balance was improved by Sulla inclusion, as reflected in the lower OSI values found in FSF100 and FSF65 groups. DAF100 group displayed the highest GPX activity, while other groups exhibited the highest SOD activity. Fresh forage diets increased albumin concentration while no effect of tested factors was noted on glucose, NEFA, BHBA and cholesterol contents. The interaction diet × genotype was significant only for GPX activity. GPX and albumin were negatively correlated and were correlated positively and negatively with ROMs, respectively. Diet rather than genotype affects redox balance in dairy goats and a possible role of forage polyphenol compounds on oxidative status needs to be tested in future studies.Entities:
Keywords: CSN1S1 genotype; diet; enzymatic antioxidants; fresh forage; goat; redox balance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32182905 PMCID: PMC7139644 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9030224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Chemical composition of diets.
| Diet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAF100 | DAF65 | FSF100 | FSF65 | ||
| Dry matter | % | 87.5 | 85.7 | 19.1 | 47.1 |
| Crude protein | % DM 1 | 15.0 | 15.1 | 17.2 | 15.5 |
| Ether extract | % DM | 2.1 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 2.8 |
| NDF 2 | % DM | 54.2 | 44.3 | 32.5 | 26.7 |
| ADF 3 | % DM | 36.8 | 24.6 | 26.9 | 19.4 |
| ADL 4 | % DM | 12.9 | 6.7 | 4.9 | 3.5 |
| Ash | % DM | 11.3 | 10.4 | 9.6 | 6.71 |
| NFC 5 | % DM | 17.4 | 27.9 | 37.5 | 48.3 |
| UFL 6 | n/kg DM | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
1 DM = Dry matter. 2 NDF= Neutral Detergent Fiber. 3 ADF = Acid Detergent Fiber. 4 ADL = Acid Detergent Lignin. 5 NFC = Nonfiber Carbohydrates, NFC = 100 − (% NDF + % CP + % ether extract + % ash). 6 UFL = Net energy for milk production according to [39].
Least squares means of ROMs (U.Carr), BAP (Ln μmol/L), SOD (Ln U/mL whole blood), GPX (Ln U/L whole blood), Glucose (mg/100 mL), NEFA (mmol/L), BHBA (mmol/L), Cholesterol (mg/100 mL) and Albumin (Ln g/L) in dairy goats with different genotype fed dry and fresh diets ad libitum.
| Item | Diet (D) | SEM | Genotype (G) | SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAF100 | DAF65 | FSF100 | FSF65 | AA | AF | D | G | D × G | |||
|
| 240.34 A | 260.80 A | 75.60 B | 71.79 B | 23.12 | 165.85 | 158.42 | 16.41 | 0.001 | 0.750 | 0.762 |
|
| 7.66 b | 7.94 a | 7.96 a | 8.01 a | 0.097 | 7.91 | 7.87 | 0.069 | 0.050 | 0.647 | 0.684 |
|
| 12.01 A | 9.92 A | 2.87 B | 2.44 B | 1.413 | 7.29 | 6.33 | 1.003 | 0.001 | 0.502 | 0.720 |
|
| 5.09 b | 5.35 a | 5.47 a | 5.37 a | 0.080 | 5.32 | 5.33 | 0.057 | 0.040 | 0.935 | 0.617 |
|
| 10.34 a | 9.95 b | 9.72 c | 9.76 c | 0.073 | 10.01 $ | 9.88 £ | 0.055 | 0.001 | 0.104 | 0.036 |
|
| 51.03 | 49.59 | 51.63 | 53.00 | 1.56 | 50.79 | 50.83 | 1.11 | 0.093 | 0.977 | 0.443 |
|
| 0.163 | 0.133 | 0.262 | 0.176 | 0.053 | 0.164 | 0.203 | 0.037 | 0.397 | 0.471 | 0.685 |
|
| 0.377 | 0.340 | 0.287 | 0.512 | 0.064 | 0.425 | 0.333 | 0.045 | 0.150 | 0.166 | 0.296 |
|
| 66.72 | 67.96 | 67.04 | 68.29 | 4.52 | 65.30 | 69.71 | 3.21 | 0.994 | 0.338 | 0.866 |
|
| 3.31 b | 3.32 b | 3.86 a | 3.85 a | 0.02 | 3.58 | 3.59 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.665 | 0.395 |
Values within a row without a common superscript letter are significantly different: (A, B), (a, b, c) and ($, £) indicate significance at p ≤ 0.01, p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.10 levels, respectively. Abbreviations: ROMs = reactive oxygen metabolites; BAP = biological antioxidant potential; OSI = oxidative stress index; GPX = glutathione peroxidase activity; SOD = superoxide dismutase activity; NEFA = non-esterified fatty acids, BHBA = D-3-Hydroxybutyrate.
Figure 1Interaction between genotype and diet for endogenous enzymatic antioxidant (GPX). Values within diets with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Pearson correlation coefficients and probabilities significance of oxidative status biomarkers in late lactation goats.
| ROMs | BAP | SOD | Albumin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.541 ** | −0.280 * | −0.219 * | −0.475 ** |
|
| −0.303 * | |||
|
| −0.796 ** |
* p < 0.10; ** p < 0.001. GPX = glutathione peroxidase; SOD = superoxide dismutase; ROMs = reactive oxygen metabolites; BAP = biological antioxidant potential.