Lauren M Kaplan1,2, Rebecca L Sudore3, Isabel Arellano Cuervo4, Dustin Bainto5,6, Pamela Olsen1,2, Margot Kushel1,2. 1. Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 4. Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 5. UC Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Joint Medical Program, UC Berkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. 6. School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
Background/ Objectives: Older homeless-experienced adults have low rates of advance care planning (ACP) engagement despite high rates of morbidity and mortality. To inform intervention development, we examined potential barriers and solutions to ACP engagement. Design: Cross-sectional qualitative study. Setting: We recruited adults who were homeless in the prior three years and ≥50 years of age in the San Francisco Bay Area, and recruited clinical stakeholders from a national meeting of homeless providers. We analyzed qualitative data using thematic analysis. Measurements: We conducted semistructured interviews with homeless-experienced older adults (n = 20) and focus groups with clinical stakeholders (n = 24) about perceived barriers and solutions to ACP engagement. Results: Participants considered ACP important, reflecting on deaths of people in their networks who had died. Participant-identified barriers to ACP included poor ACP knowledge, lack of familial ties and social isolation, competing priorities, avoidance and lack of readiness, fatalism and mistrust, and lack of ACP training for clinical and nonclinical staff. They identified solutions that included framing ACP as a way to provide meaning and assert choice, providing easy-to-read written documents focused on the populations' unique needs, tailoring content and delivery, initiating ACP in nonclinical settings, such as permanent supportive housing, and providing incentives. Conclusions: Both older homeless-experienced adults and clinical stakeholders believe that ACP is important, but acknowledge multiple barriers that impede engagement. By focusing on potential solutions, including capitalizing on opportunities outside of health care settings, focusing on the period after housing, and tailoring content, there are opportunities to improve ACP uptake.
Background/ Objectives: Older homeless-experienced adults have low rates of advance care planning (ACP) engagement despite high rates of morbidity and mortality. To inform intervention development, we examined potential barriers and solutions to ACP engagement. Design: Cross-sectional qualitative study. Setting: We recruited adults who were homeless in the prior three years and ≥50 years of age in the San Francisco Bay Area, and recruited clinical stakeholders from a national meeting of homeless providers. We analyzed qualitative data using thematic analysis. Measurements: We conducted semistructured interviews with homeless-experienced older adults (n = 20) and focus groups with clinical stakeholders (n = 24) about perceived barriers and solutions to ACP engagement. Results:Participants considered ACP important, reflecting on deaths of people in their networks who had died. Participant-identified barriers to ACP included poor ACP knowledge, lack of familial ties and social isolation, competing priorities, avoidance and lack of readiness, fatalism and mistrust, and lack of ACP training for clinical and nonclinical staff. They identified solutions that included framing ACP as a way to provide meaning and assert choice, providing easy-to-read written documents focused on the populations' unique needs, tailoring content and delivery, initiating ACP in nonclinical settings, such as permanent supportive housing, and providing incentives. Conclusions: Both older homeless-experienced adults and clinical stakeholders believe that ACP is important, but acknowledge multiple barriers that impede engagement. By focusing on potential solutions, including capitalizing on opportunities outside of health care settings, focusing on the period after housing, and tailoring content, there are opportunities to improve ACP uptake.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance care planning; homelessness; older adults
Authors: Tracey Holsinger; Brenda L Plassman; Karen M Stechuchak; James R Burke; Cynthia J Coffman; John W Williams Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rebecca T Brown; Kaveh Hemati; Elise D Riley; Christopher T Lee; Claudia Ponath; Lina Tieu; David Guzman; Margot B Kushel Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2017-08-01
Authors: John Song; Dianne M Bartels; Edward R Ratner; Lucy Alderton; Brenda Hudson; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.128