OBJECTIVES: To determine whether brief cognitive screening tests perform as well as a longer screening test in diagnosis of cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) or dementia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparison of cognitive screening tests to an independent criterion standard evaluation using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. Performance of the cognitive screening tests for identifying dementia, and separately for identifying dementia or CIND, was characterized using sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. SETTING: Three Department of Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Of 826 independently living veterans aged 65 and older without a prior diagnosis of dementia, 639 participated and 630 were assigned a research diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: Screening tests included the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS; average time to administer, 17 minutes) and three brief instruments: the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS; 4 minutes), the Mini-Cog (3 minutes), and a novel two-item functional memory screen (MF-2; 1.5 minutes). RESULTS: Participants were aged 74.8 on average and were mostly white or black. They were mostly male (92.9%) and had been prescribed a mean of 7.7 medications for chronic conditions. The prevalence of dementia and CIND was 3.3% and 39.2%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 86% and 79% for the 3MS, 76% and 73% for the Mini-Cog, 43% and 93% for the MIS, and 38% and 87% for the MF-2, respectively. CONCLUSION: In individuals without a prior diagnosis of cognitive impairment, the prevalence of dementia was low, but the prevalence of CIND was high. The 3MS and Mini-Cog had reasonable performance characteristics for detecting dementia, but a definitive diagnosis requires additional evaluation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether brief cognitive screening tests perform as well as a longer screening test in diagnosis of cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) or dementia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparison of cognitive screening tests to an independent criterion standard evaluation using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. Performance of the cognitive screening tests for identifying dementia, and separately for identifying dementia or CIND, was characterized using sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. SETTING: Three Department of Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Of 826 independently living veterans aged 65 and older without a prior diagnosis of dementia, 639 participated and 630 were assigned a research diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: Screening tests included the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS; average time to administer, 17 minutes) and three brief instruments: the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS; 4 minutes), the Mini-Cog (3 minutes), and a novel two-item functional memory screen (MF-2; 1.5 minutes). RESULTS:Participants were aged 74.8 on average and were mostly white or black. They were mostly male (92.9%) and had been prescribed a mean of 7.7 medications for chronic conditions. The prevalence of dementia and CIND was 3.3% and 39.2%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 86% and 79% for the 3MS, 76% and 73% for the Mini-Cog, 43% and 93% for the MIS, and 38% and 87% for the MF-2, respectively. CONCLUSION: In individuals without a prior diagnosis of cognitive impairment, the prevalence of dementia was low, but the prevalence of CIND was high. The 3MS and Mini-Cog had reasonable performance characteristics for detecting dementia, but a definitive diagnosis requires additional evaluation.
Authors: Allison R Kaup; Amy L Byers; Cherie Falvey; Eleanor M Simonsick; Suzanne Satterfield; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Stephen F Smagula; Susan M Rubin; Kristine Yaffe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: T K Malmstrom; V B Voss; D M Cruz-Oliver; L A Cummings-Vaughn; N Tumosa; G T Grossberg; J E Morley Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Pujan Dave; Guadalupe Villarreal; David S Friedman; Malik Y Kahook; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nicole R Fowler; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Greg A Sachs; Malaz A Boustani Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Derjung M Tarn; Maureen Barrientos; Angel Y Wang; Abhijit Ramaprasad; Margaret C Fang; Janice B Schwartz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Janice M Ranson; Elżbieta Kuźma; William Hamilton; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Kenneth M Langa; David J Llewellyn Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2019-04