OBJECTIVES: To compare the end-of-life medical care experienced by African-American and white decedents and their families. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective survey with weighted results based on a two-stage probability sampling design. SETTING: Hospitals, nursing homes, and home-based medical services across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Surrogates (N=1,447; primarily family members) for decedents from 22 states. MEASUREMENTS: Validated end-of-life care outcomes concerning symptom management, decision-making, informing and supporting families, individualized care, coordination, service utilization, and financial impact. RESULTS: Family members of African-American decedents were less likely than those of white decedents to rate the care received as excellent or very good (odds ratio (OR)=0.4). They were more likely to report absent (OR=2.4) or problematic (OR=1.9) physician communication, concerns with being informed (OR=2.5), and concerns with family support (OR=2.6). Family members of African Americans were less likely than those of whites to report that the decedent had treatment wishes (OR=0.3) or written advance care planning documents (OR=0.4). These differences persist when limiting the sample to respondents whose expectations for life-sustaining treatments matched treatments received. Family members of African-American decedents also were more likely to report financial hardship due to savings depletion (OR=2.1) or difficulty paying for care (OR=2.0) and that family/friends (OR=2.0) or home health workers (OR=1.9) provided home care. CONCLUSION: This national study brings evidence that racial disparities persist into end-of-life care, particularly regarding communication and family needs. Results also suggest different home care patterns and levels of financial impact.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the end-of-life medical care experienced by African-American and white decedents and their families. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective survey with weighted results based on a two-stage probability sampling design. SETTING: Hospitals, nursing homes, and home-based medical services across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Surrogates (N=1,447; primarily family members) for decedents from 22 states. MEASUREMENTS: Validated end-of-life care outcomes concerning symptom management, decision-making, informing and supporting families, individualized care, coordination, service utilization, and financial impact. RESULTS: Family members of African-American decedents were less likely than those of white decedents to rate the care received as excellent or very good (odds ratio (OR)=0.4). They were more likely to report absent (OR=2.4) or problematic (OR=1.9) physician communication, concerns with being informed (OR=2.5), and concerns with family support (OR=2.6). Family members of African Americans were less likely than those of whites to report that the decedent had treatment wishes (OR=0.3) or written advance care planning documents (OR=0.4). These differences persist when limiting the sample to respondents whose expectations for life-sustaining treatments matched treatments received. Family members of African-American decedents also were more likely to report financial hardship due to savings depletion (OR=2.1) or difficulty paying for care (OR=2.0) and that family/friends (OR=2.0) or home health workers (OR=1.9) provided home care. CONCLUSION: This national study brings evidence that racial disparities persist into end-of-life care, particularly regarding communication and family needs. Results also suggest different home care patterns and levels of financial impact.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Adam D Schickedanz; Dean Schillinger; C Seth Landefeld; Sara J Knight; Brie A Williams; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Karen O Moss; Nancy L Deutsch; Patricia J Hollen; Virginia G Rovnyak; Ishan C Williams; Karen M Rose Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Bernadette A Thomas; Rudolph A Rodriguez; Edward J Boyko; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nicole S Nevadunsky; Lori Spoozak; Sharon Gordon; Enid Rivera; Kimala Harris; Gary L Goldberg Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.437