Literature DB >> 18279906

Interpolation and extrapolation on the path of apparent motion.

Hinze Hogendoorn1, Thomas A Carlson, Frans A J Verstraten.   

Abstract

An object moving in discrete steps can appear to move continuously even along sections of the path in which no stimulus is presented. We investigated whether the internal representation of such an object is constructed by extrapolation, along the expected trajectory of the object, or by interpolation, after the subsequent reappearance of the object. Observers viewed two discs moving in an unambiguous apparent motion display, which either occasionally reversed direction or continued moving along the predicted path. Observers carried out a speeded 2AFC task on probes presented between the possible disc locations. In the continuous condition, observers' reaction times to detect and identify a probe were longer when it occurred ahead of the disc than when it occurred elsewhere on the motion path. Conversely, when the disc reversed direction, significantly less interference was observed ahead of the disc (along the predicted motion path), and significantly more interference was observed behind the disc (along the updated motion path). We conclude that the representation of a moving object in an apparent motion display is constructed by interpolation as well as extrapolation. We demonstrate that this representation is maintained and updated even outside the locus of focused attention, and that it is possible to dissociate the contributions of interpolation and extrapolation mechanisms to an object's representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18279906     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information.

Authors:  Tessel Blom; Daniel Feuerriegel; Philippa Johnson; Stefan Bode; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Grace Edwards; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Visual Benefits in Apparent Motion Displays: Automatically Driven Spatial and Temporal Anticipation Are Partially Dissociated.

Authors:  Merle-Marie Ahrens; Domenica Veniero; Joachim Gross; Monika Harvey; Gregor Thut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Apparent motion can impair and enhance target visibility: the role of shape in predicting and postdicting object continuity.

Authors:  Peter J Lenkic; James T Enns
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01

6.  Contribution of Visuospatial and Motion-Tracking to Invisible Motion.

Authors:  Luca Battaglini; Clara Casco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-14

7.  Neural responses to apparent motion can be predicted by responses to non-moving stimuli.

Authors:  Marlene Poncet; Justin M Ales
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.