Literature DB >> 24392894

Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex.

Peter Kok1, Michel F Failing, Floris P de Lange.   

Abstract

Sensory processing is strongly influenced by prior expectations. Valid expectations have been shown to lead to improvements in perception as well as in the quality of sensory representations in primary visual cortex. However, very little is known about the neural correlates of the expectations themselves. Previous studies have demonstrated increased activity in sensory cortex following the omission of an expected stimulus, yet it is unclear whether this increased activity constitutes a general surprise signal or rather has representational content. One intriguing possibility is that top-down expectation leads to the formation of a template of the expected stimulus in visual cortex, which can then be compared with subsequent bottom-up input. To test this hypothesis, we used fMRI to noninvasively measure neural activity patterns in early visual cortex of human participants during expected but omitted visual stimuli. Our results show that prior expectation of a specific visual stimulus evokes a feature-specific pattern of activity in the primary visual cortex (V1) similar to that evoked by the corresponding actual stimulus. These results are in line with the notion that prior expectation triggers the formation of specific stimulus templates to efficiently process expected sensory inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24392894     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  57 in total

Review 1.  How Does Experience Shape Early Development? Considering the Role of Top-Down Mechanisms.

Authors:  L L Emberson
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Information-Theoretic Evidence for Predictive Coding in the Face-Processing System.

Authors:  Alla Brodski-Guerniero; Georg-Friedrich Paasch; Patricia Wollstadt; Ipek Özdemir; Joseph T Lizier; Michael Wibral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  How Our Perception and Confidence Are Altered Using Decision Cues.

Authors:  Tiasha Saha Roy; Bapun Giri; Arpita Saha Chowdhury; Satyaki Mazumder; Koel Das
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  The influence of subcortical shortcuts on disordered sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Raymond J Dolan; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information.

Authors:  Tessel Blom; Daniel Feuerriegel; Philippa Johnson; Stefan Bode; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  QnAs with Richard N. Aslin.

Authors:  Brian Doctrow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Dissociating the impact of attention and expectation on early sensory processing.

Authors:  Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-23

9.  The amygdala instructs insular feedback for affective learning.

Authors:  Dominic Kargl; Joanna Kaczanowska; Sophia Ulonska; Florian Groessl; Lukasz Piszczek; Jelena Lazovic; Katja Buehler; Wulf Haubensak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Pim Mostert; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.