| Literature DB >> 32178484 |
Ivan Kushkevych1,2, Jiří Cejnar1, Jakub Treml2, Dani Dordević3, Peter Kollar4, Monika Vítězová1.
Abstract
Sulfate is present in foods, beverages, and drinking water. Its reduction and concentration in the gut depend on the intestinal microbiome activity, especially sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), which can be involved in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Assimilatory sulfate reduction (ASR) is present in all living organisms. In this process, sulfate is reduced to hydrogen sulfide and then included in cysteine and methionine biosynthesis. In contrast to assimilatory sulfate reduction, the dissimilatory process is typical for SRB. A terminal product of this metabolism pathway is hydrogen sulfide, which can be involved in gut inflammation and also causes problems in industries (due to corrosion effects). The aim of the review was to compare assimilatory and dissimilatory sulfate reduction (DSR). These processes occur in some species of intestinal bacteria (e.g., Escherichia and Desulfovibrio genera). The main attention was focused on the description of genes and their location in selected strains. Their coding expression of the enzymes is associated with anabolic processes in various intestinal bacteria. These analyzed recent advances can be important factors for proposing possibilities of metabolic pathway extension from hydrogen sulfide to cysteine in intestinal SRB. The switch from the DSR metabolic pathway to the ASR metabolic pathway is important since toxic sulfide is not produced as a final product.Entities:
Keywords: assimilatory; cysteine biosynthesis; hydrogen sulfide; intestinal microbiota; sulfate reduction; sulfate-reducing bacteria; toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32178484 PMCID: PMC7140700 DOI: 10.3390/cells9030698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Various bacterial genera involved in sulfur metabolism (modified from Carbonero et al. 2012) [2].
| Source of Sulfate | Substrates Containing Sulfur | Bacteria Genera | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inorganic | Sulfate (SO42−) | Gibson et al. 1988 [ | |
| Sulfite (SO32−) |
| Baron et al. 1989 [ | |
|
| Kelly and Myers 2005 [ | ||
| Organic | Cysteine |
| Metaxas and Delwiche 1955 [ |
|
| Shatalin et al. 2011 [ | ||
|
| Kredich et al. 1972 [ | ||
|
| Wheeler et al. 2005 [ | ||
|
| Kim et al. 2006 [ | ||
|
| Igarashi et al. 2009 [ | ||
|
| Yoshida et al. 2010 [ | ||
|
| Yoshida et al. 2010 [ | ||
| Genom cysteine desulfohydrase | |||
| Genom cysteine desulfohydrase | |||
| Genom cysteine desulfohydrase | |||
| Sulfomucin | Roberton et al. 2000 [ | ||
|
| Roberton et al. 2000 [ | ||
|
| Slomiany et al. 1992 [ | ||
| Genom glycosulfatase |
Figure 1The pathways of the dissimilatory (A) and assimilatory (B) sulfate reduction, from Santos et al. 2015 [47].
Figure 2Localization of aprA and aprB genes.
Figure 3The structure of sulfite reductase (3D structure) [47].
Figure 4Localization of dsvA, dsvB, dsvC genes.
Figure 5The pathway of dissimilatory sulfate reduction and the genes encoding the enzymes of this process.
Figure 6Cluster cysPUWA.
Figure 7Cluster cysCND.
Figure 8Cluster CysJIH.