Min Zhang1, Geoffrey S Young1, Huai Chen1,2, Jing Li1,3, Lei Qin4, J Ricardo McFaline-Figueroa5, David A Reardon4, Xinhua Cao6, Xian Wu7, Xiaoyin Xu1. 1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Cancer Hospital), Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsing-hua University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately one-fourth of all cancer metastases are found in the brain. MRI is the primary technique for detection of brain metastasis, planning of radiotherapy, and the monitoring of treatment response. Progress in tumor treatment now requires detection of new or growing metastases at the small subcentimeter size, when these therapies are most effective. PURPOSE: To develop a deep-learning-based approach for finding brain metastasis on MRI. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SEQUENCE: Axial postcontrast 3D T1 -weighted imaging. FIELD STRENGTH: 1.5T and 3T. POPULATION: A total of 361 scans of 121 patients were used to train and test the Faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN): 1565 lesions in 270 scans of 73 patients for training; 488 lesions in 91 scans of 48 patients for testing. From the 48 outputs of Faster R-CNN, 212 lesions in 46 scans of 18 patients were used for training the RUSBoost algorithm (MatLab) and 276 lesions in 45 scans of 30 patients for testing. ASSESSMENT: Two radiologists diagnosed and supervised annotation of metastases on brain MRI as ground truth. This data were used to produce a 2-step pipeline consisting of a Faster R-CNN for detecting abnormal hyperintensity that may represent brain metastasis and a RUSBoost classifier to reduce the number of false-positive foci detected. STATISTICAL TESTS: The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by using sensitivity, false-positive rate, and receiver's operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The detection performance was assessed both per-metastases and per-slice. RESULTS: Testing on held-out brain MRI data demonstrated 96% sensitivity and 20 false-positive metastases per scan. The results showed an 87.1% sensitivity and 0.24 false-positive metastases per slice. The area under the ROC curve was 0.79. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that deep-learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) had the potential of detecting brain metastases with high sensitivity and reasonable specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1227-1236.
BACKGROUND: Approximately one-fourth of all cancer metastases are found in the brain. MRI is the primary technique for detection of brain metastasis, planning of radiotherapy, and the monitoring of treatment response. Progress in tumor treatment now requires detection of new or growing metastases at the small subcentimeter size, when these therapies are most effective. PURPOSE: To develop a deep-learning-based approach for finding brain metastasis on MRI. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SEQUENCE: Axial postcontrast 3D T1 -weighted imaging. FIELD STRENGTH: 1.5T and 3T. POPULATION: A total of 361 scans of 121 patients were used to train and test the Faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN): 1565 lesions in 270 scans of 73 patients for training; 488 lesions in 91 scans of 48 patients for testing. From the 48 outputs of Faster R-CNN, 212 lesions in 46 scans of 18 patients were used for training the RUSBoost algorithm (MatLab) and 276 lesions in 45 scans of 30 patients for testing. ASSESSMENT: Two radiologists diagnosed and supervised annotation of metastases on brain MRI as ground truth. This data were used to produce a 2-step pipeline consisting of a Faster R-CNN for detecting abnormal hyperintensity that may represent brain metastasis and a RUSBoost classifier to reduce the number of false-positive foci detected. STATISTICAL TESTS: The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by using sensitivity, false-positive rate, and receiver's operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The detection performance was assessed both per-metastases and per-slice. RESULTS: Testing on held-out brain MRI data demonstrated 96% sensitivity and 20 false-positive metastases per scan. The results showed an 87.1% sensitivity and 0.24 false-positive metastases per slice. The area under the ROC curve was 0.79. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that deep-learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) had the potential of detecting brain metastases with high sensitivity and reasonable specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1227-1236.
Authors: D Greto; S Scoccianti; A Compagnucci; C Arilli; M Casati; G Francolini; S Cecchini; M Loi; I Desideri; L Bordi; P Bono; P Bonomo; I Meattini; B Detti; L Livi Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Bodo Lippitz; Christer Lindquist; Ian Paddick; David Peterson; Kevin O'Neill; Ronald Beaney Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Vittorio Stumpo; Julius M Kernbach; Christiaan H B van Niftrik; Martina Sebök; Jorn Fierstra; Luca Regli; Carlo Serra; Victor E Staartjes Journal: Acta Neurochir Suppl Date: 2022
Authors: Simon Williams; Hugo Layard Horsfall; Jonathan P Funnell; John G Hanrahan; Danyal Z Khan; William Muirhead; Danail Stoyanov; Hani J Marcus Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Youngjin Yoo; Pascal Ceccaldi; Siqi Liu; Thomas J Re; Yue Cao; James M Balter; Eli Gibson Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2021-05-22