Literature DB >> 34041305

Evaluating deep learning methods in detecting and segmenting different sizes of brain metastases on 3D post-contrast T1-weighted images.

Youngjin Yoo1, Pascal Ceccaldi1, Siqi Liu1, Thomas J Re1, Yue Cao2,3,4, James M Balter2,4, Eli Gibson1.   

Abstract

Purpose: We investigate the impact of various deep-learning-based methods for detecting and segmenting metastases with different lesion volume sizes on 3D brain MR images. Approach: A 2.5D U-Net and a 3D U-Net were selected. We also evaluated weak learner fusion of the prediction features generated by the 2.5D and the 3D networks. A 3D fully convolutional one-stage (FCOS) detector was selected as a representative of bounding-box regression-based detection methods. A total of 422 3D post-contrast T1-weighted scans from patients with brain metastases were used. Performances were analyzed based on lesion volume, total metastatic volume per patient, and number of lesions per patient.
Results: The performance of detection of the 2.5D and 3D U-Net methods had recall of > 0.83 and precision of > 0.44 for lesion volume > 0.3    cm 3 but deteriorated as metastasis size decreased below 0.3    cm 3 to 0.58 to 0.74 in recall and 0.16 to 0.25 in precision. Compared the two U-Nets for detection capability, high precision was achieved by the 2.5D network, but high recall was achieved by the 3D network for all lesion sizes. The weak learner fusion achieved a balanced performance between the 2.5D and 3D U-Nets; particularly, it increased precision to 0.83 for lesion volumes of 0.1 to 0.3    cm 3 but decreased recall to 0.59. The 3D FCOS detector did not outperform the U-Net methods in detecting either the small or large metastases presumably because of the limited data size. Conclusions: Our study provides the performances of four deep learning methods in relationship to lesion size, total metastasis volume, and number of lesions per patient, providing insight into further development of the deep learning networks.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain metastasis; deep learning; detection; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo; segmentation; small lesion

Year:  2021        PMID: 34041305      PMCID: PMC8140611          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.037001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  19 in total

1.  Interval From Imaging to Treatment Delivery in the Radiation Surgery Age: How Long Is Too Long?

Authors:  Zachary A Seymour; Shannon E Fogh; Sarah K Westcott; Steve Braunstein; David A Larson; Igor J Barani; Jean Nakamura; Penny K Sneed
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Epidemiology of brain metastases.

Authors:  Lakshmi Nayak; Eudocia Quant Lee; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multimodal MR images with a deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Odelin Charron; Alex Lallement; Delphine Jarnet; Vincent Noblet; Jean-Baptiste Clavier; Philippe Meyer
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  ORCHESTRAL FULLY CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS FOR SMALL LESION SEGMENTATION IN BRAIN MRI.

Authors:  Botian Xu; Yaqiong Chai; Cristina M Galarza; Chau Q Vu; Benita Tamrazi; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Luke Macyszyn; Thomas D Coates; Natasha Lepore; John C Wood
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-05-24

Review 6.  Updates in the management of brain metastases.

Authors:  Nils D Arvold; Eudocia Q Lee; Minesh P Mehta; Kim Margolin; Brian M Alexander; Nancy U Lin; Carey K Anders; Riccardo Soffietti; D Ross Camidge; Michael A Vogelbaum; Ian F Dunn; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry.

Authors:  Thorsten Falk; Dominic Mai; Robert Bensch; Özgün Çiçek; Ahmed Abdulkadir; Yassine Marrakchi; Anton Böhm; Jan Deubner; Zoe Jäckel; Katharina Seiwald; Alexander Dovzhenko; Olaf Tietz; Cristina Dal Bosco; Sean Walsh; Deniz Saltukoglu; Tuan Leng Tay; Marco Prinz; Klaus Palme; Matias Simons; Ilka Diester; Thomas Brox; Olaf Ronneberger
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Incidence and prognosis of patients with brain metastases at diagnosis of systemic malignancy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Daniel N Cagney; Allison M Martin; Paul J Catalano; Amanda J Redig; Nancy U Lin; Eudocia Q Lee; Patrick Y Wen; Ian F Dunn; Wenya Linda Bi; Stephanie E Weiss; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Brian M Alexander; Ayal A Aizer
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data.

Authors:  Khaled Bousabarah; Maximilian Ruge; Julia-Sarita Brand; Mauritius Hoevels; Daniel Rueß; Jan Borggrefe; Nils Große Hokamp; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; David Maintz; Harald Treuer; Martin Kocher
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.