Literature DB >> 32166525

Handling Anomalous Data in the Lab: Students' Perspectives on Deleting and Discarding.

Mikkel Willum Johansen1, Frederik Voetmann Christiansen2.   

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses empirical results from a survey about the research practice of Danish chemistry students, with a main focus on the question of anomalous data. It seeks to investigate how such data is handled by students, with special attention to so-called 'questionable research practices' (QRPs) where anomalous data are simply deleted or discarded. This question of QRPs is of particular importance as the educational practices students experience may influence how they act in their future professional careers, for instance in research. The ethical evaluation of QRPs however is not univocal. In parts of the literature QRPs are seen as unquestionably bad, while in other parts of the literature certain QRPs are seen as a necessary aspect of scientific practice. Results from the survey of Danish chemistry students shows that many students engage in certain types of questionable practices, and that a large minority of the students have been actively encouraged by their teachers to engage in such practices. The paper discusses to what extent and under what circumstances such instructional practices can be defended and suggests how the instructional practice connected to the handling of anomalous data can be improved.

Keywords:  Academic dishonesty; Laboratory practice; Professional ethics; Questionable research practices

Year:  2020        PMID: 32166525     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00206-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Trevor S Harding; Donald D Carpenter; Cynthia J Finelli; Honor J Passow
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.

Authors:  Leslie K John; George Loewenstein; Drazen Prelec
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-04-16

3.  Strategies for Teaching Professional Ethics to IT Engineering Degree Students and Evaluating the Result.

Authors:  Rafael Miñano; Ángel Uruburu; Ana Moreno-Romero; Diego Pérez-López
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Assessing Freshman Engineering Students' Understanding of Ethical Behavior.

Authors:  Amber M Henslee; Susan L Murray; Gayla R Olbricht; Douglas K Ludlow; Malcolm E Hays; Hannah M Nelson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.

Authors:  Raymond de Vries; Melissa S Anderson; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Science, politics and spontaneous generation in nineteenth-century France: the Pasteur-Pouchet debate.

Authors:  J Farley; G L Geison
Journal:  Bull Hist Med       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Ryan P Brown; Stephen T Murphy; Jason H Hill; Alison L Antes; Ethan P Waples; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2008-10-01

Review 10.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.