Literature DB >> 15152857

Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study.

Trevor S Harding1, Donald D Carpenter, Cynthia J Finelli, Honor J Passow.   

Abstract

Previous research indicates that students in engineering self-report cheating in college at higher rates than those in most other disciplines. Prior work also suggests that participation in one deviant behavior is a reasonable predictor of future deviant behavior. This combination of factors leads to a situation where engineering students who frequently participate in academic dishonesty are more likely to make unethical decisions in professional practice. To investigate this scenario, we propose the hypotheses that (1) there are similarities in the decision-making processes used by engineering students when considering whether or not to participate in academic and professional dishonesty, and (2) prior academic dishonesty by engineering students is an indicator of future decisions to act dishonestly. Our sample consisted of undergraduate engineering students from two technically-oriented private universities. As a group, the sample reported working full-time an average of six months per year as professionals in addition to attending classes during the remaining six months. This combination of both academic and professional experience provides a sample of students who are experienced in both settings. Responses to open-ended questions on an exploratory survey indicate that students identify common themes in describing both temptations to cheat or to violate workplace policies and factors which caused them to hesitate in acting unethically, thus supporting our first hypothesis and laying the foundation for future surveys having forced-choice responses. As indicated by the responses to forced-choice questions for the engineering students surveyed, there is a relationship between self-reported rates of cheating in high school and decisions to cheat in college and to violate workplace policies; supporting our second hypothesis. Thus, this exploratory study demonstrates connections between decision-making about both academic and professional dishonesty. If better understood, these connections could lead to practical approaches for encouraging ethical behavior in the academic setting, which might then influence future ethical decision-making in workplace settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15152857     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-004-0027-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  1 in total

1.  Involvement of nursing students in unethical classroom and clinical behaviors.

Authors:  G A Hilbert
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.104

  1 in total
  17 in total

1.  Academic integrity in a mandatory physics lab: the influence of post-graduate aspirations and grade point averages.

Authors:  Tricia Bertram Gallant; Michael G Anderson; Christine Killoran
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Using Insights from Applied Moral Psychology to Promote Ethical Behavior Among Engineering Students and Professional Engineers.

Authors:  Scott D Gelfand
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Ethics: An Indispensable Dimension in the University Rankings.

Authors:  Ali Khaki Sedigh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and student collusion: marks do not tell the whole truth.

Authors:  R Parks; P M Warren; K M Boyd; H Cameron; A Cumming; G Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing?

Authors:  Lidija Bilic-Zulle; Josip Azman; Vedran Frkovic; Mladen Petrovecki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Effect of dispositional traits on pharmacy students' attitude toward cheating.

Authors:  Marilyn D Saulsbury; Ulysses J Brown; Simone O Heyliger; Ruby L Beale
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics.

Authors:  Petr Houdek
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Changing the Engineering Student Culture with Respect to Academic Integrity and Ethics.

Authors:  Tammy VanDeGrift; Heather Dillon; Loreal Camp
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Competing duties: medical educators, underperforming students, and social accountability.

Authors:  Thalia Arawi; Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  A systemic analysis of cheating in an undergraduate engineering mechanics course.

Authors:  Tricia Bertram Gallant; Lelli Van Den Einde; Scott Ouellette; Sam Lee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.