| Literature DB >> 32165986 |
K Wittstein1,2, A Cordsmeier1,3, C Lambert1,2, L Wendt1,2, E B Sir4, J Weber1,2, N Wurzler1,2, L E Petrini5, M Stadler1,2.
Abstract
Rosellinia (Xylariaceae) is a large, cosmopolitan genus comprising over 130 species that have been defined based mainly on the morphology of their sexual morphs. The genus comprises both lignicolous and saprotrophic species that are frequently isolated as endophytes from healthy host plants, and important plant pathogens. In order to evaluate the utility of molecular phylogeny and secondary metabolite profiling to achieve a better basis for their classification, a set of strains was selected for a multi-locus phylogeny inferred from a combination of the sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), the large subunit (LSU) of the nuclear rDNA, beta-tubulin (TUB2) and the second largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II (RPB2). Concurrently, various strains were surveyed for production of secondary metabolites. Metabolite profiling relied on methods with high performance liquid chromatography with diode array and mass spectrometric detection (HPLC-DAD/MS) as well as preparative isolation of the major components after re-fermentation followed by structure elucidation using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and high resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS). Two new and nine known isopimarane diterpenoids were identified during our mycochemical studies of two selected Dematophora strains and the metabolites were tested for biological activity. In addition, the nematicidal cyclodepsipeptide PF1022 A was purified and identified from a culture of Rosellinia corticium, which is the first time that this endophyte-derived drug precursor has been identified unambiguously from an ascospore-derived isolate of a Rosellinia species. While the results of this first HPLC profiling were largely inconclusive regarding the utility of secondary metabolites as genus-specific chemotaxonomic markers, the phylogeny clearly showed that species featuring a dematophora-like asexual morph were included in a well-defined clade, for which the genus Dematophora is resurrected. Dematophora now comprises all previously known important plant pathogens in the genus such as D. arcuata, D. bunodes, D. necatrix and D. pepo, while Rosellinia s. str. comprises those species that are known to have a geniculosporium-like or nodulisporium-like asexual morph, or where the asexual morph remains unknown. The extensive morphological studies of L.E. Petrini served as a basis to transfer several further species from Rosellinia to Dematophora, based on the morphology of their asexual morphs. However, most species of Rosellinia and allies still need to be recollected in fresh state, cultured, and studied for their morphology and their phylogenetic affinities before the infrageneric relationships can be clarified.Entities:
Keywords: Dematophora; Dematophora acutispora (Theiss.) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora arcuata (Petch) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora asperata (Massee ex Wakef.) Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora beccariana (Ces.) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M, Stadler; Dematophora boedijnii (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora bothrina (Berk. & Broome) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora bunodes (Berk. & Broome) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora buxi (Fabre) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora compacta (Takemoto) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora francisiae (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora freycinetiae (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora gigantea (Ellis & Everh.) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora grantii (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora hsiehiae (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora hughesii (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora javaensis (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora macdonaldii (Bres.) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora obregonii (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora obtusiostiolata (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora paraguayensis (Starbäck) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora pepo (Pat.) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora puiggarii (Pat.) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora pyramidalis (Lar.N. Vassiljeva) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora samuelsii (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Dematophora siggersii (L.E. Petrini) C. Lambert, K. Wittstein & M. Stadler; Genus resurrection; Isopimarane diterpenoids; PF1022A; Polythetic taxonomy; Rosellinia; Xylariaceae
Year: 2020 PMID: 32165986 PMCID: PMC7056724 DOI: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stud Mycol ISSN: 0166-0616 Impact factor: 16.097
List of used taxa for chemical analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction. GenBank accession numbers, strain ID of public culture collections or herbaria (if available), origin and reference studies are given. Type specimens are labelled with HT (holotype) or ET (epitype). Strains included in the chemical study are marked in bold. ∗This strain was labelled Rosellinia britannica, but this is a later erected synonym of Rosellinia marcucciana Ces., Atti dell´Accademia di Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche Napoli (1872) 5:13 fidePetrini (2013).
| Species | Strain number | Origin | Status | GenBank accession numbers | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | LSU | RPB2 | TUB2 | |||||
| HAST 91111209 | Taiwan | N/A | ||||||
| HAST 91092308 | Taiwan | N/A | ||||||
| MUCL 29409 | Japan | MN984615 | MN984624 | MN987235 | MN987240 | This study | ||
| CBS 123584 | Peru | MN984617 | N/A | N/A | MN987243 | |||
| CBS 123585 | Peru | MN984618 | N/A | N/A | MN987244 | |||
| CBS 123597 | Peru | MN984619 | MN984625 | N/A | MN987245 | |||
| CBS 124028 | Peru | |||||||
| JDR 99 | France | N/A | ||||||
| CBS 349.36 | Argentina | |||||||
| W 97 | Japan | |||||||
| CBS 123592 | Peru | MN984620 | N/A | N/A | MN987246 | This study | ||
| JDR 100 | France | N/A | ||||||
| JDR 261 | USA | N/A | ||||||
| CBS 270.87 | France | |||||||
| MUCL 51264 | Germany | |||||||
| CBS 163.93 | Germany | |||||||
| BISH 467 | USA | N/A | ||||||
| HAST 405 | Martinique | N/A | ||||||
| FL 0980 | USA | N/A | ||||||
| HAST 90080610 | Taiwan | N/A | ||||||
| HAST 91102001 | Taiwan | N/A | ||||||
| WSP 176 | Mexico | N/A | ||||||
| CBS 656.78 | Australia | |||||||
| MUCL 51703 | France | |||||||
| MUCL 51704 | France | MN984616 | MN984626 | MN987238 | MN987238 | This study | ||
| MUCL 51693 | France | |||||||
| STMA 13324 | Germany | MN984621 | MN984627 | MN987237 | MN987241 | This study | ||
| STMA 12170-15209 | Germany | MN984623 | MN984629 | MN987236 | MN987242 | This study | ||
| CBS 449.89 | Sweden | MN984622 | MN984628 | MN987239 | N/A | This study | ||
| CBS 126415 | Germany | |||||||
| CBS 122620 | Germany | |||||||
| MUCL 49884 | France | |||||||
| WSP 205 | Taiwan | N/A | ||||||
Fig. 1Inferred phylogenetic tree of selected Xylariaceae, Hypoxylaceae and Graphostromataceae calculated by PhyML with 1 000 bootstrap replicates from a multigene alignment of the ITS-LSU ribosomal DNA region and the TUB2 and RPB2 regions. Bootstrap values above 50% are displayed at their respective branches. Sequence information originating from type strains are highlighted in bold.
13C and 1H NMR data of dematophoranes A and B (1–2).
| (1) | (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75.2, CH | 3.68, dd (8.6, 7.4) | 69.9, CH | 4.26, m |
| 2 | 29.7, CH2 | 1.73, m | 29.7, CH2 | 1.70, m |
| 3a | 34.9, CH2 | 1.13, dt (13.0, 3.4) | 34.3, CH2 | 1.06, m |
| 3b | 1.61, m | 1.68, m | ||
| 4 | 38.0, C | 37.8, C | ||
| 5 | 55.5, CH | 2.95, s | 48.9, CH | 3.76, s |
| 6 | 212.4, C | 4.66, m | 211.1, C | |
| 7 | 73.8, CH | 76.5, CH | 4.76, m | |
| 8 | 131.8, C | 139.65, C | ||
| 9 | 146.9, C | 75.3, C | ||
| 10 | 51.2, C | 52.4, C | ||
| 11a | 24.9, CH2 | 2.34, dt (19.4, 7.5) | 31.3, CH2 | 2.06, m |
| 11b | 2.54, ddd (19.2, 7.9, 5.5) | 2.42, td (14.7, 3.4) | ||
| 12a | 30.4, CH2 | 1.41, m | 32.2, CH2 | 1.44, dtd (14.2, 4.1,2.8) |
| 12b | 1.81, ddd (13.5, 7.9, 6.1) | 1.75, td (14.2, 3.4) | ||
| 13 | 40.2, C | 37.9, C | ||
| 14 | 72.7, CH | 3.99, s | 130.6, CH | 5.84, s |
| 15 | 145.8, CH | 6.10, dd (17.6, 11.0) | 149.4, CH | 5.86, dd (17.6, 10.6) |
| 16a | 113.3, CH2 | 5.10, dd (10.2, 1.6) | 110.9, CH2 | 4.92, dd (10.7, 1.4) |
| 16b | 5.10, dd (10.2, 1.6) | 5.00, dd (17.5, 1.4) | ||
| 17 | 22.8, CH3 | 0.95, s | 24.1, CH3 | 1.01, s |
| 18 | 18.6, CH3 | 1.24, s | 18.8, CH3 | 1.21, s |
| 19a | 70.7, CH2 | 3.08, d (10.8) | 70.6, CH2 | 3.05, m |
| 19b | 3.46, d (10.8) | 3.54, m | ||
| 20 | 18.0, CH3 | 1.01, s | 13.9, CH3 | 0.87, s |
| OH-1 | 3.41, d (5.6) | |||
| OH-7 | 3.84, d (4.3) | |||
| OH-9 | 4.35, s | |||
| OH-18 | 3.74, t (5.8) | |||
1 (125 MHz and 500 MHz, MeOH-d4), 2 (175 MHz and 700 MHz, acetone-d6),
Fig. 2New isopimarane diterpenoids, dematophoranes A and B (1-2), isolated from Dematophora bunodes (CBS123585).
Fig. 3Relevant 1H,1H-COSY- (red arrows) and 1H-13C-HMBC (green arrows) correlations of dematophorane A (1).
Fig. 4Isolated secondary metabolites (3-12), known from different species of the orders Xylariales and Hypocreales.
Fig. 5HPLC-UV chromatograms (210 nm) of crude extracts from Dematophora bunodes (CBS123584), D. bunodes (CBS123597), D. pepo (CBS123592), Rosellinia corticium (STMA13324), R. aquila (STMA15208), R. marcucciana (MUCL51704), and Astrocystis mirabilis (ATTC66432) cultivated in liquid CM medium (200 mL). The detected isopimarane diterpenoids (1–3, 5–6, 8–11) are marked.
Fig. 6HPLC-UV chromatograms (210 nm) of crude extracts containing PF1022A (top to bottom: pure PF1022A, Rosellinia corticium (STMA13324), R. corticium (STMA15209), Astrocystis mirabilis (ATTC66432).
In vitro antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic activity of dematophoranes A-B (1-2), libertellenone M (3), myrocin B (5) and libertellenone C (7). All compounds were dissolved in methanol (1 mg/ml, test volume: 20 μl). 20 μl of methanol showed no effect on the test organisms. MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration. Positive controls: [a] Oxytetracyclin hydrochloride, [b] Gentamycin, [c] Nystatin; [d] Epothilon B, n.i.: no inhibition.
| Test organisms | MIC [μg/mL] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (5) | (7) | Ref [a,b,c] | |
| n.i | 67.0 | n.i | 33.3 | n.i. | 8.3 [a] | |
| 67.0∗ | 67.0 | n.i | 67.0 | n.i | 0.42 - 0.83 [a] | |
| 67.0 | 67.0 | n.i | 67.0 | n.i. | 3.3 [a] | |
| 67.0 | 67.0 | n.i | 33.3 | 67.0∗ | 0.42–0.83 [a] | |
| n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | 0.83 [a] | |
| n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | 3.3–6.7 [a] | |
| n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | 4.2 [b] | |
| n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | 8.3 [c] | |
| n.i | n.i | n.i | - | n.i | 16.6 [c] | |
| n.i. | n.i. | n.i. | n.i | n.i | 2.1 [c] | |
| n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | n.i | 16.6 [c] | |
| n.i. | 67.0∗ | 67.0∗ | n.i | 67.0∗ | 8.3 [c] | |
| Mouse fibroblast cell line L929 | 28 | 20 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 1.1 × 10-3 [d] |
| Cervix carcinoma cell line KB-3-1 | 6.5 | 16 | 6.1 | - | 14 | 0.06 × 10-3 [d] |
| Primary Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells HUVEC | - | - | - | 0.75 | - | 0.2 × 10-3 [d] |
The cell density was adjusted to 8 × 106 cells/mL. ∗ no complete inhibition; DSMZ: German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig.
Species groups of Rosellinia sensuPetrini (2013) and their salient morphological features.
| Species group | Conidiophore type | Ratio of ascospore length/width | Ascospore germ slit | Other characteristic features of asci/ascospores |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <4 | straight, spore length | cellular appendages, slimy caps and sheath mostly present | ||
| <4 | straight or diagonal, spore length to 2/3 spore length | cellular appendages, slimy caps and sheath mostly present | ||
| ≥4 | variable | cellular appendages, slimy caps and sheath mostly absent | ||
| <4 | straight, mostly spore length | cellular appendages, slimy caps and sheath absent; usually smaller than 16 μm | ||
| ≥4 | straight, short | cellular appendages absent, slimy sheath present | ||
| <4 | straight, mostly spore length | cellular appendages absent, slimy caps or sheath present | ||
| <4 | straight, mostly spore length | cellular appendages, slimy caps and sheath present |
Fig. 7Sexual and asexual morph structures of different Rosellinia species. A, L, T. R. breensis (Sir & Hladki 841-LIL). B, S. R. hyalospora (Sir & Hladki 463-LIL). C. R. megalospora (Sir & Hladki 972-LIL). D, E, J, M, P. R. longispora (Sir & Hladki 939-LIL). F–I, K. R. rickii (Sir & Hladki 062-LIL). N, O. R. canzacotoana (Sir & Hladki 198-LIL). Q, R. Rosellinia sp. (Sir & Hladki 377-LIL). A, B, D. Stromata in substrate. C. Stromata emerging from the subiculum (arrow). E. Cross section of stromata. F. Stromata and conidiophores (arrows). G–I. Conidiogenous structure in 3% KOH. J, K. Ascus in 3% KOH. L–N. Ascus apical plugs in Melzer's reagent. O, P, S, T. Ascospores showing germ slit in 3% KOH (arrows). Q, R. Ascospores showing cellular appendages in 3% KOH (arrows). Scale bars: A = 2 mm; B–F = 1 mm; G, H, L–T = 10 μm; I, J = 50 μm; K = 20 μm.
Fig. 8Asexual and sexual morph structures of different Dematophora species. A, B, F, O. D. necatrix (Hladki 4004-LIL). C-E, G, H, L–N, P. D. paraguayensis (Sir & Hladki 1098-LIL). I–K. D. arcuata (Sir & Hladki 1098-LIL). A, B. Stromata on substrate. D, C. Stromata and subiculum (arrows). E. Stromata and synnemata (arrows) on substrate. F. Short stipitate stroma in cross section. G. Synnema on substrate. H, I. Synnemata in 3 % KOH solution. J. Details of conidiogenous region. K. Detail of conidiogenous cell. L. Asci in Melzer’s reagent. M. Ascus apical plugs in 3 % KOH. N. Ascus apical plug in Melzer's reagent. O, P. Ascospores showing short and central germ slit in 3 % KOH (arrows). Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B, C = 2 mm; D, E = 1 mm; F, G = 500 μm; H, I = 200 μm; J, L = 50 μm; K, M, N, O, P = 10 μm.