Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, only a subset of patients (25-50%) have a pathologic complete response at cystectomy. Using a cohort of 58 patients from two phase 2 trials, our group previously reported that mutations in the ATM, RB1, and FANCC genes correlate with complete response to cisplatin-based NAC, and consequently improve OS and disease-specific survival (DSS). These trials enrolled patients with T2-4 (N0 or N1) MIBC and treated them with accelerated/dose-dense NAC with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin, or gemcitabine and cisplatin, with a plan for curative cystectomy. Updated long-term follow-up (median 74 mo) shows that significantly greater OS and DSS was maintained for patients with ATM, RB1, or FANCC mutations. The 5-yr survival rate for patients with at least one mutation was 85%, compared to 45% for patients without a mutation. On the basis of the associations with response and long-term OS and DSS, we propose that these alterations may be useful as predictive biomarkers to allow clinicians to prioritize patients who are most likely to benefit from NAC before radical cystectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we looked at outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant) who had mutations in a set of DNA damage repair genes (ATM, RB1, FANCC) compared to those who did not. We found that patients who had at least one mutation in one of these genes survived longer after receiving cisplatin chemotherapy before surgery than patients who did not.
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, only a subset of patients (25-50%) have a pathologic complete response at cystectomy. Using a cohort of 58 patients from two phase 2 trials, our group previously reported that mutations in the ATM, RB1, and FANCC genes correlate with complete response to cisplatin-based NAC, and consequently improve OS and disease-specific survival (DSS). These trials enrolled patients with T2-4 (N0 or N1) MIBC and treated them with accelerated/dose-dense NAC with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin, or gemcitabine and cisplatin, with a plan for curative cystectomy. Updated long-term follow-up (median 74 mo) shows that significantly greater OS and DSS was maintained for patients with ATM, RB1, or FANCC mutations. The 5-yr survival rate for patients with at least one mutation was 85%, compared to 45% for patients without a mutation. On the basis of the associations with response and long-term OS and DSS, we propose that these alterations may be useful as predictive biomarkers to allow clinicians to prioritize patients who are most likely to benefit from NAC before radical cystectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we looked at outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant) who had mutations in a set of DNA damage repair genes (ATM, RB1, FANCC) compared to those who did not. We found that patients who had at least one mutation in one of these genes survived longer after receiving cisplatin chemotherapy before surgery than patients who did not.
Authors: Ming Yin; Monika Joshi; Richard P Meijer; Michael Glantz; Sheldon Holder; Harold A Harvey; Matthew Kaag; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Simon Horenblas; Joseph J Drabick Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-04-06
Authors: Homayoun Zargar; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black; Wassim Kassouf Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Guru Sonpavde; Bryan H Goldman; V O Speights; Seth P Lerner; David P Wood; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ronald B Natale; H Barton Grossman; E David Crawford Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Roland L Dunbrack; Timothy A Brennan; Mark D Andrake; Yan Zhou; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Michael Slifker; Katherine Alpaugh; Essel Dulaimi; Norma Palma; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Marijo Bilusic; Yu-Ning Wong; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Costas D Lallas; Edouard J Trabulsi; Roman Yelensky; David J McConkey; Vincent A Miller; Erica A Golemis; Eric A Ross Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Rosalia Viterbo; Edouard J Trabulsi; Eric A Ross; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Costas D Lallas; Yu-Ning Wong; Jianqing Lin; Alexander Kutikov; Efrat Dotan; Timothy A Brennan; Norma Palma; Essel Dulaimi; Reza Mehrazin; Stephen A Boorjian; William Kevin Kelly; Robert G Uzzo; Gary R Hudes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Gordon Robertson; Jaegil Kim; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Joaquim Bellmunt; Guangwu Guo; Andrew D Cherniack; Toshinori Hinoue; Peter W Laird; Katherine A Hoadley; Rehan Akbani; Mauro A A Castro; Ewan A Gibb; Rupa S Kanchi; Dmitry A Gordenin; Sachet A Shukla; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Donna E Hansel; Bogdan A Czerniak; Victor E Reuter; Xiaoping Su; Benilton de Sa Carvalho; Vinicius S Chagas; Karen L Mungall; Sara Sadeghi; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Yiling Lu; Leszek J Klimczak; Jiexin Zhang; Caleb Choo; Akinyemi I Ojesina; Susan Bullman; Kristen M Leraas; Tara M Lichtenberg; Catherine J Wu; Nicholaus Schultz; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson; Gordon B Mills; David J McConkey; John N Weinstein; David J Kwiatkowski; Seth P Lerner Journal: Cell Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Gopa Iyer; Arjun V Balar; Matthew I Milowsky; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Harry W Herr; William C Huang; Samir S Taneja; Michael Woods; Irina Ostrovnaya; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Maria E Arcila; Jamie C Riches; Andreas Meier; Caitlin Bourque; Maha Shady; Helen Won; Tracy L Rose; William Y Kim; Brooke E Kania; Mariel E Boyd; Catharine K Cipolla; Ashley M Regazzi; Daniela Delbeau; Asia S McCoy; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Dean F Bajorin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Se Young Choi; Moon Soo Ha; Byung Hoon Chi; Jin Wook Kim; In Ho Chang; Tae-Hyoung Kim; Soon Chul Myung; Myoungsuk Kim; Kyung-Eun Lee; Yuwon Kim; Hyun-Ki Woo; Dae-Sung Kyoung; Hasung Kim Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Song Ee Park; Hee Sung Kim; Eun-Jung Jung; Ja Hee Suh; Hyeyoung Min; Kyong-Choun Chi; Jong Won Kim; Joong-Min Park; In Gyu Hwang Journal: J Cancer Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Juan Carlos Pardo; Vicenç Ruiz de Porras; Andrea Plaja; Cristina Carrato; Olatz Etxaniz; Oscar Buisan; Albert Font Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-29 Impact factor: 5.923