Literature DB >> 26238431

Defects in DNA Repair Genes Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Elizabeth R Plimack1, Roland L Dunbrack2, Timothy A Brennan3, Mark D Andrake2, Yan Zhou2, Ilya G Serebriiskii2, Michael Slifker2, Katherine Alpaugh2, Essel Dulaimi2, Norma Palma3, Jean Hoffman-Censits4, Marijo Bilusic2, Yu-Ning Wong2, Alexander Kutikov2, Rosalia Viterbo2, Richard E Greenberg2, David Y T Chen2, Costas D Lallas4, Edouard J Trabulsi4, Roman Yelensky3, David J McConkey5, Vincent A Miller3, Erica A Golemis2, Eric A Ross2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), with 25-50% of patients expected to achieve a pathologic response. Validated biomarkers predictive of response are currently lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To discover and validate biomarkers predictive of response to NAC for MIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pretreatment MIBC samples prospectively collected from patients treated in two separate clinical trials of cisplatin-based NAC provided the discovery and validation sets. DNA from pretreatment tumor tissue was sequenced for all coding exons of 287 cancer-related genes and was analyzed for base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, and selected rearrangements in a Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments-certified laboratory. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The mean number of variants and variant status for each gene were correlated with response. Variant data from the discovery cohort were used to create a classification tree to discriminate responders from nonresponders. The resulting decision rule was then tested in the independent validation set. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients with a pathologic complete response had more alterations than those with residual tumor in both the discovery (p=0.024) and validation (p=0.018) sets. In the discovery set, alteration in one or more of the three DNA repair genes ATM, RB1, and FANCC predicted pathologic response (p<0.001; 87% sensitivity, 100% specificity) and better overall survival (p=0.007). This test remained predictive for pathologic response in the validation set (p=0.033), with a trend towards better overall survival (p=0.055). These results require further validation in additional sample sets.
CONCLUSIONS: Genomic alterations in the DNA repair-associated genes ATM, RB1, and FANCC predict response and clinical benefit after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for MIBC. The results suggest that defective DNA repair renders tumors sensitive to cisplatin. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Chemotherapy given before bladder removal (cystectomy) improves the chance of cure for some but not all patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found a set of genetic mutations that when present in tumor tissue predict benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that testing before chemotherapy may help in selecting patients for whom this approach is recommended.
Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM; Biomarkers; Bladder cancer; Cisplatin resistance; Cisplatin sensitivity; DNA repair; FANCC; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; RB1; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238431      PMCID: PMC4764095          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  26 in total

1.  Clinicopathological outcomes after radical cystectomy for clinical T2 urothelial carcinoma: further evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Canter; Christopher Long; Alexander Kutikov; Elizabeth Plimack; Ismail Saad; Megan Oblaczynski; Fang Zhu; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Robert G Uzzo; Richard E Greenberg; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance.

Authors:  L Galluzzi; L Senovilla; I Vitale; J Michels; I Martins; O Kepp; M Castedo; G Kroemer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy.

Authors:  Woonyoung Choi; Sima Porten; Seungchan Kim; Daniel Willis; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Beat Roth; Tiewei Cheng; Mai Tran; I-Ling Lee; Jonathan Melquist; Jolanta Bondaruk; Tadeusz Majewski; Shizhen Zhang; Shanna Pretzsch; Keith Baggerly; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Bogdan Czerniak; Colin P N Dinney; David J McConkey
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Prediction of phenotypes of missense mutations in human proteins from biological assemblies.

Authors:  Qiong Wei; Qifang Xu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-11-05

Review 5.  The effects of deregulated DNA damage signalling on cancer chemotherapy response and resistance.

Authors:  Peter Bouwman; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Prevalence and co-occurrence of actionable genomic alterations in high-grade bladder cancer.

Authors:  Gopa Iyer; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Nikolaus Schultz; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Irina Ostrovnaya; Arjun V Balar; Philip H Kim; Oscar Lin; Nils Weinhold; Chris Sander; Emily C Zabor; Manickam Janakiraman; Ilana R Garcia-Grossman; Adriana Heguy; Agnes Viale; Bernard H Bochner; Victor E Reuter; Dean F Bajorin; Matthew I Milowsky; Barry S Taylor; David B Solit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  ATM is required for the repair of Topotecan-induced replication-associated double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Sabrina Köcher; Anja Spies-Naumann; Malte Kriegs; Jochen Dahm-Daphi; Irena Dornreiter
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types.

Authors:  Cyriac Kandoth; Michael D McLellan; Fabio Vandin; Kai Ye; Beifang Niu; Charles Lu; Mingchao Xie; Qunyuan Zhang; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Mark D M Leiserson; Christopher A Miller; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Michael C Wendl; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  137 in total

1.  ARF Confers a Context-Dependent Response to Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz B Owczarek; Takashi Kobayashi; Ricardo Ramirez; Lijie Rong; Anna M Puzio-Kuter; Gopa Iyer; Min Yuen Teo; Francisco Sánchez-Vega; Jingqiang Wang; Nikolaus Schultz; Tian Zheng; David B Solit; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Molecular Characterization of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Thenappan Chandrasekar; Annette Erlich; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Targeting DNA repair in cancer: current state and novel approaches.

Authors:  Apostolos Klinakis; Dimitris Karagiannis; Theodoros Rampias
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Concomitant CIS on TURBT does not impact oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy.

Authors:  N Vasdev; H Zargar; J P Noël; R Veeratterapillay; A S Fairey; L S Mertens; C P Dinney; M C Mir; L M Krabbe; M S Cookson; N E Jacobsen; N M Gandhi; J Griffin; J S Montgomery; E Y Yu; E Xylinas; N J Campain; W Kassouf; M A Dall'Era; J A Seah; C E Ercole; S Horenblas; S S Sridhar; J S McGrath; J Aning; S F Shariat; J L Wright; T M Morgan; T J Bivalacqua; S North; D A Barocas; Y Lotan; P Grivas; A J Stephenson; J B Shah; B W van Rhijn; S Daneshmand; P E Spiess; J M Holzbeierlein; A Thorpe; P C Black
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Defects in DNA Repair Genes Confer Improved Long-term Survival after Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Miron; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Fern Anari; John O'Neill; Daniel M Geynisman; Matthew R Zibelman; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; David Chen; Costas D Lallas; Edouard J Trabulsi; R Katherine Alpaugh; Essel Dulaimi; Erica A Golemis; Robert Uzzo; Eric A Ross; Elizabeth R Plimack
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 6.  Genomic Subtyping in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tuomas Jalanko; Joep J de Jong; Ewan A Gibb; Roland Seiler; Peter C Black
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Biomarkers for platinum sensitivity in bladder cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Rashed A Ghandour; Ganesh V Raj
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

Review 8.  Toward personalized management in bladder cancer: the promise of novel molecular taxonomy.

Authors:  Marie-Lisa Eich; Lars Dyrskjøt; George J Netto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  The emerging role of homologous recombination repair and PARP inhibitors in genitourinary malignancies.

Authors:  Kalen J Rimar; Phuoc T Tran; Richard S Matulewicz; Maha Hussain; Joshua J Meeks
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  The Emergence of Precision Urologic Oncology: A Collaborative Review on Biomarker-driven Therapeutics.

Authors:  Christopher E Barbieri; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Seth P Lerner; Charles Swanton; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.