Literature DB >> 3216006

Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model.

A G Glaros1, R B Kline.   

Abstract

While researchers usually are concerned about psychometric properties of psychological tests estimated using large samples, most clinical decision-makers must evaluate the accuracy of test results for individuals. This is particularly true as regards tests that have cutting scores to determine, for example, whether to assign a particular diagnosis or accept an applicant into a training program. This paper reviews a conceptual model that may foster improved understanding of test outcomes for individuals. The terms "sensitivity," "specificity," and "predictive value" are defined, and the relations of positive and negative predictive values to population base rates are emphasized. Examples from the psychological literature are presented to illustrate the utility of these concepts in clinical decision-making with psychological tests. Implications for test users, test developers, and instructors are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3216006     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6<1013::aid-jclp2270440627>3.0.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9762


  21 in total

1.  Identifying Young Gifted Children Using the Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form.

Authors:  Steven I Pfeiffer; Yaacov Petscher
Journal:  Gift Child Q       Date:  2008

2.  The δ latent dementia phenotype in the uniform data set: Cross-validation and extension.

Authors:  Brandon E Gavett; Vanessa Vudy; Mary Jeffrey; Samantha E John; Ashita S Gurnani; Jason W Adams
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Benchmarking Treatment Response in Tourette's Disorder: A Psychometric Evaluation and Signal Detection Analysis of the Parent Tic Questionnaire.

Authors:  Emily J Ricketts; Joseph F McGuire; Susanna Chang; Deepika Bose; Madeline M Rasch; Douglas W Woods; Matthew W Specht; John T Walkup; Lawrence Scahill; Sabine Wilhelm; Alan L Peterson; John Piacentini
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2017-05-25

4.  The Psychometric Latent Agreement Model (PLAM) for Discrete Latent Variables Measured by Multiple Items.

Authors:  Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Organ Res Methods       Date:  2011-01

5.  Mental Health Screening and Differences in Access to Care among Prisoners.

Authors:  Michael S Martin; Anne G Crocker; Beth K Potter; George A Wells; Rebecca M Grace; Ian Colman
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Manon Truchon; Marie-Ève Schmouth; Denis Côté; Lise Fillion; Michel Rossignol; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

Review 7.  An efficient early phase 2 procedure to screen medications for efficacy in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Evaluation of a Suicide Risk Assessment Tool in a Large Sample of Detained Youth.

Authors:  Hygiea Casiano; Shay-Lee Bolton; Laurence Y Katz; James M Bolton; Jitender Sareen
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-01

9.  The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a screening instrument for norwegian child and adolescent mental health services, application of UK scoring algorithms.

Authors:  Per Håkan Brøndbo; Børge Mathiassen; Monica Martinussen; Einar Heiervang; Mads Eriksen; Therese Fjeldmo Moe; Guri Sæther; Siv Kvernmo
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  The development of the Problematic Online Gaming Questionnaire (POGQ).

Authors:  Zsolt Demetrovics; Róbert Urbán; Katalin Nagygyörgy; Judit Farkas; Mark D Griffiths; Orsolya Pápay; Gyöngyi Kökönyei; Katalin Felvinczi; Attila Oláh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.