Kenneth A Perkins1, Caryn Lerman. 1. Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA, perkinska@upmc.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Initial screening of new medications for potential efficacy (i.e., Food and Drug Administration (FDA) early phase 2), such as in aiding smoking cessation, should be efficient in identifying which drugs do, or do not, warrant more extensive (and expensive) clinical testing. OBJECTIVES: This focused review outlines our research on development, evaluation, and validation of an efficient crossover procedure for sensitivity in detecting medication efficacy for smoking cessation. First-line FDA-approved medications of nicotine patch, varenicline, and bupropion were tested as model drugs, in three separate placebo-controlled studies. We also tested specificity of our procedure in identifying a drug that lacks efficacy, using modafinil. RESULTS: This crossover procedure showed sensitivity (increased days of abstinence) during week-long "practice" quit attempts with each of the active cessation medications (positive controls) versus placebo, but not with modafinil (negative control) versus placebo, as hypothesized. Sensitivity to medication efficacy signal was observed only in smokers high in intrinsic quit motivation (i.e., already preparing to quit soon) and not smokers low in intrinsic quit motivation, even if monetarily reinforced for abstinence (i.e., given extrinsic motivation). CONCLUSIONS: A crossover procedure requiring less time and fewer subjects than formal trials may provide an efficient strategy for a go/no-go decision whether to advance to subsequent phase 2 randomized clinical trials with a novel drug. Future research is needed to replicate our results and evaluate this procedure with novel compounds, identify factors that may limit its utility, and evaluate its applicability to testing efficacy of compounds for treating other forms of addiction.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Initial screening of new medications for potential efficacy (i.e., Food and Drug Administration (FDA) early phase 2), such as in aiding smoking cessation, should be efficient in identifying which drugs do, or do not, warrant more extensive (and expensive) clinical testing. OBJECTIVES: This focused review outlines our research on development, evaluation, and validation of an efficient crossover procedure for sensitivity in detecting medication efficacy for smoking cessation. First-line FDA-approved medications of nicotine patch, varenicline, and bupropion were tested as model drugs, in three separate placebo-controlled studies. We also tested specificity of our procedure in identifying a drug that lacks efficacy, using modafinil. RESULTS: This crossover procedure showed sensitivity (increased days of abstinence) during week-long "practice" quit attempts with each of the active cessation medications (positive controls) versus placebo, but not with modafinil (negative control) versus placebo, as hypothesized. Sensitivity to medication efficacy signal was observed only in smokers high in intrinsic quit motivation (i.e., already preparing to quit soon) and not smokers low in intrinsic quit motivation, even if monetarily reinforced for abstinence (i.e., given extrinsic motivation). CONCLUSIONS: A crossover procedure requiring less time and fewer subjects than formal trials may provide an efficient strategy for a go/no-go decision whether to advance to subsequent phase 2 randomized clinical trials with a novel drug. Future research is needed to replicate our results and evaluate this procedure with novel compounds, identify factors that may limit its utility, and evaluate its applicability to testing efficacy of compounds for treating other forms of addiction.
Authors: David Gonzales; Stephen I Rennard; Mitchell Nides; Cheryl Oncken; Salomon Azoulay; Clare B Billing; Eric J Watsky; Jason Gong; Kathryn E Williams; Karen R Reeves Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Saul Shiffman; Stuart G Ferguson; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis; William G Shadel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kenneth A Perkins; K N Roy Chengappa; Joshua L Karelitz; Margaret C Boldry; Valerie Michael; Taylor Herb; Jessica Gannon; Jaspreet Brar; Lisa Ford; Stefanie Rassnick; Darlene H Brunzell Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Meghan J Chenoweth; Robert A Schnoll; Maria Novalen; Larry W Hawk; Tony P George; Paul M Cinciripini; Caryn Lerman; Rachel F Tyndale Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Larry W Hawk; Rebecca L Ashare; Jessica D Rhodes; Jason A Oliver; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Martin C Mahoney Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz; Valerie C Michael; Margaret Fromuth; Cynthia A Conklin; K N Roy Chengappa; Chris Hope; Caryn Lerman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Cheyenne Allenby; Anne Marie Burke; Roy Hamilton; Mario Cristancho; Rebecca L Ashare; James Loughead; Caryn Lerman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; David A MacQueen; Nicole S Marquinez; James MacKillop; Warren K Bickel; Thomas H Brandon Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2017-04
Authors: Keith G Heinzerling; Aimee-Noelle Swanson; Timothy M Hall; Yi Yi; Yingnian Wu; Steven J Shoptaw Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; Michael Trujillo; Katherine J Ameringer; Jennifer W Tidey; Steve Sussman; Christopher W Kahler Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2014-05