Michael S Martin1,2, Anne G Crocker3,4, Beth K Potter2, George A Wells2, Rebecca M Grace5, Ian Colman2. 1. 1 Mental Health Branch, Correctional Service of Canada. 2. 2 School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario. 3. 3 Research & Academics, Institute Philippe-Pinel de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 4. 4 Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 5. 5 Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Disparities in mental health care exist between regional and demographic groups. While screening is recommended as part of a correctional mental health strategy, little work has been done to explore whether it can narrow regional and demographic disparities in access to care. We compared treatment access rates by sex, race, age, and region in relation to screening results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data. All 7965 admissions to the prison system were followed for a median of 14 months. RESULTS: Males and non-Indigenous minority racial groups had lower rates of treatment regardless of screening results; they were less likely both to self-report needs and to receive treatment if these needs were reported. Regional differences revealed higher treatment rates in Atlantic Canada and Ontario, as well as higher rates of inmates self-reporting needs on screening who did not receive treatment in the Atlantic, Québec, and Pacific regions. There were minimal differences between inmates of different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest potential resource gaps and/or differences in the performance of screening to detect mental health needs across demographic and regional groups. Screening did not narrow, and may have widened, differences between groups.
OBJECTIVE: Disparities in mental health care exist between regional and demographic groups. While screening is recommended as part of a correctional mental health strategy, little work has been done to explore whether it can narrow regional and demographic disparities in access to care. We compared treatment access rates by sex, race, age, and region in relation to screening results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data. All 7965 admissions to the prison system were followed for a median of 14 months. RESULTS: Males and non-Indigenous minority racial groups had lower rates of treatment regardless of screening results; they were less likely both to self-report needs and to receive treatment if these needs were reported. Regional differences revealed higher treatment rates in Atlantic Canada and Ontario, as well as higher rates of inmates self-reporting needs on screening who did not receive treatment in the Atlantic, Québec, and Pacific regions. There were minimal differences between inmates of different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest potential resource gaps and/or differences in the performance of screening to detect mental health needs across demographic and regional groups. Screening did not narrow, and may have widened, differences between groups.
Keywords:
health care disparities; mass screening; mental disorders; mental health services; prisons
Authors: Bruce B Way; Donald A Sawyer; Stephanie N Lilly; Catherine Moffitt; Barbara J Stapholz Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Fatos Kaba; Angela Solimo; Jasmine Graves; Sarah Glowa-Kollisch; Allison Vise; Ross MacDonald; Anthony Waters; Zachary Rosner; Nathaniel Dickey; Sonia Angell; Homer Venters Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anne G Crocker; Tonia L Nicholls; Michael C Seto; Gilles Côté; Yanick Charette; Malijai Caulet Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Jitender Sareen; Amit Jagdeo; Brian J Cox; Ian Clara; Margreet ten Have; Shay-Lee Belik; Ron de Graaf; Murray B Stein Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: J Senior; L Birmingham; M A Harty; L Hassan; A J Hayes; K Kendall; C King; J Lathlean; C Lowthian; A Mills; R Webb; G Thornicroft; J Shaw Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Hygiea Casiano; Jennifer M Hensel; Mariette J Chartier; Okechukwu Ekuma; Leonard MacWilliam; Natalie Mota; Chelsey McDougall; James M Bolton Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 4.356