Literature DB >> 25620870

The Psychometric Latent Agreement Model (PLAM) for Discrete Latent Variables Measured by Multiple Items.

Levent Dumenci1.   

Abstract

The Psychometric Latent Agreement Model (PLAM) is proposed for estimating the subpopulation membership of individuals (e.g., satisfactory performers vs. unsatisfactory performers) at discrete levels of multiple latent trait variables. A binary latent Type variable is introduced to take account of the possibility that, for a given set of observed variables, the latent group memberships of some individuals are indeterminate. The latent Type variable allows for separating individuals who can reliably be assigned to satisfactory versus unsatisfactory performers classes from those individuals whose ratings do not contain the necessary information to make the class assignment possible for a particular set of rating items. Agreements among discrete latent trait variables are also estimated. The PLAM was illustrated with two examples using real data on behavioral rating measures. One example involved ratings of two behavioral constructs by a single rater type, whereas the other involved ratings of one construct by three rater types. Implications were presented for using behavioral ratings to determine the subpopulation membership, such as qualified versus unqualified groupings in hiring decisions and pass versus fail groupings in performance evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  latent Type variable; latent agreement; latent class analysis; measurement design; quantitative multivariate research; research design; survey research

Year:  2011        PMID: 25620870      PMCID: PMC4303905          DOI: 10.1177/1094428110374649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Res Methods        ISSN: 1094-4281


  16 in total

1.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Indexing systematic rater agreement with a latent-class model.

Authors:  Christof Schuster; David A Smith
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-09

3.  Latent class analysis of diagnostic agreement.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; W M Grove
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The meaning of kappa: probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited.

Authors:  I Guggenmoos-Holzmann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Kappa-like indices of observer agreement viewed from a latent class perspective.

Authors:  I Guggenmoos-Holzmann; R Vonk
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Maximum likelihood estimation of agreement in the constant predictive probability model, and its relation to Cohen's kappa.

Authors:  M Aickin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model.

Authors:  A G Glaros; R B Kline
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-11

8.  The value of latent class analysis in medical diagnosis.

Authors:  D Rindskopf; W Rindskopf
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Using association models to analyse agreement data: two examples.

Authors:  M P Becker
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Quasi-symmetric latent class models, with application to rater agreement.

Authors:  A Agresti; J B Lang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  4 in total

1.  Measurement of cancer health literacy and identification of patients with limited cancer health literacy.

Authors:  Levent Dumenci; Robin Matsuyama; Daniel L Riddle; Laura A Cartwright; Robert A Perera; Harold Chung; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

2.  Are depression and frailty overlapping syndromes in mid- and late-life? A latent variable analysis.

Authors:  Briana Mezuk; Matthew Lohman; Levent Dumenci; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  L Dumenci; R A Perera; F J Keefe; D C Ang; J Slover; M P Jensen; D L Riddle
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Classifications of good versus poor outcome following knee arthroplasty should not be defined using arbitrary criteria.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.