We have previously demonstrated native liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) mass spectrometry imaging of small intact proteins in thin tissue sections. We also showed calculation of collision cross sections for specific proteins extracted from discrete locations in tissue by LESA traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS). Here, we demonstrate an integrated native LESA TWIMS mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) workflow, in which ion mobility separation is central to the imaging experiment and which provides spatial, conformational, and mass information on endogenous proteins in a single experiment. The approach was applied to MSI of a thin tissue section of mouse kidney. The results show that the benefits of integration of TWIMS include improved specificity of the ion images and the capacity to calculate collision cross sections for any protein or protein complex detected in any pixel (without a priori knowledge of the presence of the protein).
We have previously demonstrated native liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) mass spectrometry imaging of small intact proteins in thin tissue sections. We also showed calculation of collision cross sections for specific proteins extracted from discrete locations in tissue by LESA traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS). Here, we demonstrate an integrated native LESA TWIMS mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) workflow, in which ion mobility separation is central to the imaging experiment and which provides spatial, conformational, and mass information on endogenous proteins in a single experiment. The approach was applied to MSI of a thin tissue section of mouse kidney. The results show that the benefits of integration of TWIMS include improved specificity of the ion images and the capacity to calculate collision cross sections for any protein or protein complex detected in any pixel (without a priori knowledge of the presence of the protein).
Native mass spectrometry enables the analysis of tertiary and quaternary protein structure
in the gas phase.[1] Noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonds and
salt bridges that were present in solution are preserved in the gas phase through the use of
mild electrospray ionization conditions including native-like solvents. Typically, native
mass spectrometry results in lower charge states and a narrower charge state distribution
than observed under denaturing conditions, due to more folded protein conformations with
limited available protonation sites and solvent-accessible surface
areas.[2−4] Native mass spectrometry is
often integrated with ion mobility spectrometry. In particular, traveling wave ion mobility
spectrometry (TWIMS) has found widespread use for over a decade since the introduction of
commercially available TWIMS-enabled mass spectrometers.[5−9] Structural information may be inferred from collision cross section
(CCS) values derived from drift tube ion mobility spectrometry (DTIMS) or calibrated TWIMS
measurements.[10] The CCS is a measure of the rotationally averaged 3D
shape of a gas-phase ion and has been used as further evidence for the retention of solution
phase structures in the gas phase.[11,12] The CCS may be evaluated against theoretical CCS values predicted from
X-ray crystallography structures, which can provide insight into the protein conformation,
e.g., folded or unfolded.[6,13,14] TWIMS may also serve as a filter, for example, enabling the
separation of isobaric signals with differing size-to-charge ratios. TWIMS separation of
singly charged species from multiply charged peptide and protein signals was recently
demonstrated for desorption electrospray ionization.[15]Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) MS is an ambient surface sampling technique that
is particularly suited to the direct analysis of intact proteins from biological
substrates.[16,17] LESA
mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) allows the spatial distribution of analytes, including
proteins, to be mapped.[18] As LESA MS makes use of electrospray
ionization, the technique is suitable for native mass spectrometry through use of
native-like solvents. We have previously demonstrated native LESA MS of folded proteins and
protein complexes from dried blood spots and thin tissue sections.[19−21] More recently, we demonstrated native LESA MSI of thin tissue sections
of mouse brain and liver.[21] In that work, discrete locations on adjacent
tissue sections were sampled by native LESA coupled with TWIMS-MS enabling calculation of
CCS of small proteins. Here, we have developed a LESA TWIMS-MSI workflow, in which ion
mobility separation is integral to the imaging experiment and which provides spatial,
conformational, and mass information for proteinaceous constituents of tissues within a
single experiment. The advantages of TWIMS are, first, the filtering of interfering signals
associated with direct sampling of tissue and consequent improved specificity of the ion
images and improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio and, second, the capacity for
calculation of the CCS for any protein detected in any pixel. We have applied native LESA
TWIMS-MSI to a thin tissue section of mouse kidney. We demonstrate the measurement of the
CCS values of proteins, including the 64 kDa tetrameric Hb complex, directly from tissue
during MSI, and improved ion images, especially for proteins with low intensity signals that
are obscured by isobaric species.
Methods
Materials
Kidney from wild-type mice (extraneous tissue from culled animals) was the gift of Dr.
Caroline Chadwick (University of Birmingham). Tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen and
then stored at −80 °C until sectioned. Tissue was sectioned at −22
°C at a thickness of 10 μm with a CM1810 Cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar,
Germany) and thaw mounted to glass microscope slides. Sections were stored at −80
°C until use. The tissue was not subjected to washing prior to analysis.Sodium iodide (2 μg/μL in 50% isopropanol) for TOF calibration was obtained
from Waters Corporation (Manchester, UK). Ammonium acetate and the protein standards
ubiquitin (bovine, U6253), cytochrome C (equine, C2506), and myoglobin (equine, M0630)
were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK). Argon (purity >99.998%), nitrogen
(>99.995%), and helium (>99.996%) gases were obtained from BOC (Guildford, UK). MS
grade water and methanol were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK).
LESA TWIMS-MSI
“Contact” LESA was performed using a Triversa NanoMate (Advion Biosciences,
Ithaca, NY). The diameter of the sampled area was approximately 600 μm (external
diameter of pipet tip), with sampling locations separated by 1 mm, the smallest spacing
available in the Triversa NanoMate control software ChipSoft (version 8.3.3) (see Figure ). A 5 μL aliquot of extraction solvent
(200 mM ammonium acetate + 5% methanol) was aspirated into the conductive pipet tip and
moved to the location above the tissue. The tip was pressed into the tissue surface, and
2.1 μL of solvent was dispensed. After 1 min, a 2.2 μL volume was aspirated,
and the tip was moved to the nanoESI chip. ESI was initiated with a potential of 1.8 kV
and back pressure of 0.15 PSI.
Figure 1
(a) Kidney section with pixel grid overlaid. (b) Ion image for
m/z 2894.7 (11+), corresponding to
hemoglobin heterodimer. (c) The raw mass spectrum (i.e., without arrival time
filtering) obtained from pixel 48. Peaks corresponding to a hemoglobin heterotetramer
and heterodimer are observed. (d) The raw mass spectrum obtained from pixel 42 reveals
low ion abundance.
(a) Kidney section with pixel grid overlaid. (b) Ion image for
m/z 2894.7 (11+), corresponding to
hemoglobin heterodimer. (c) The raw mass spectrum (i.e., without arrival time
filtering) obtained from pixel 48. Peaks corresponding to a hemoglobin heterotetramer
and heterodimer are observed. (d) The raw mass spectrum obtained from pixel 42 reveals
low ion abundance.IM-MS data were recorded with a Synapt G2-S HDMS (Waters Corporation). The instrument was
operated in “mobility-TOF mode” and “sensitivity mode”. The
backing pressure was raised to approximately 6.35 mBar using a Speedivalve on the roughing
pump. The trap and transfer cells were provided with argon (5 mL/min) to give a pressure
of approximately 3 × 10–2 mBar. Helium was introduced to the helium
cell at 180 mL/min. Nitrogen was provided to the TWIMS cell at 90 mL/min to give a
pressure of ∼3 mBar. The laboratory temperature was approximately 20 °C.The source conditions were as follows: source temperature, 100 °C; sampling cone,
30–80 V; source offset, 30 V; cone gas flow, 10 L/h. The StepWave ion guide
settings were left at default values. The trap DC entrance and DC bias were set to 3 and
42 V, respectively. The TWIMS device was operated with a fixed wave velocity of 500 m/s
and a wave height of 25 V. Additionally, pixels 15, 43, 48, and 49 were sampled and
analyzed a second and third time with wave heights of 24 and 26 V to assess CCS
measurement errors. Transfer collision energy was set between 10 and 15 V to improve mass
accuracy. A manual quadrupole profile was set to assist higher
m/z transmission (see Table S1, Supporting Information). Waters .raw files were acquired with the
discrete “Drift Time function” option checked in the MS Tune acquisition
window. Data were acquired for 5 min per pixel over the
m/z range 1000–8000 (pusher frequency, 138
μs; enhanced duty cycle coefficient, 1.57 ms).
Collision Cross Sections
IM-MS data were collected for ubiquitin, cytochrome C, and apo-myoglobin by direct
infusion nanoESI under denaturing conditions (10 μM in water/MeOH/acetic acid
49:49:2 v:v:v). The cone voltage and source offset voltages were both set to 150 V to
maximize unfolding of the calibrant ions. The m/z range
was 700–8000 (pusher frequency; 138 μs, enhanced duty cycle coefficient; 1.57
ms). Each standard was analyzed at three TWIMS traveling wave heights (24, 25, 26 V). The
arrival times for ions of each charge state were determined from the apex of the most
intense arrival time peak. Mean smoothing (±1 scan, 1 smooth) of the arrival time
distribution (ATD) plot was performed using MassLynx 4.1. Previously published drift tube
ion mobility CCS values obtained in nitrogen (DTCCSN2) were used for
generating a calibration curve for calculation of
TWCCSN2→N2.[10]TWCCSN2→N2 was calculated by a previously published method
adapted for N2 calibration values.[21] For proteins detected
in pixels analyzed at the three wave heights (pixels 15, 43, 48, and 49), the standard
deviation of TWCCSN2→N2 was calculated. CCSN2
calculated from crystal structures were obtained using the trajectory model (TM) in IMoS
v1.09 and .pdb files as inputs.[22]
Image Processing
Data files in the Waters .raw format were converted to mzML using MSConvert (Version 3.0,
ProteoWizard Software Foundation).[23] mzML files were imported into
MATLAB (version R2019a, MathWorks, Natick, USA.) with the imzML converter using code
adapted from Spectral Analysis software (downloaded from https://github.com/AlanRace/SpectralAnalysis on 21/03/2017).[24][25] In-house code from previous work was adapted to enable the
extraction of mass spectra from specific regions of interest from the arrival time versus
m/z plot (see Supplemental File S1).[21] The software is freely available
from http://www.biosciences-labs.bham.ac.uk/cooper/software.php.The mass spectra from multiple scans were summed at each location to form a single
spectrum (retaining arrival time information) per position. Broad
filtering: selection rules (arrival time (tA),
m/z) were defined in DriftScope (v2.9, Waters) and
then exported as a text file and imported into the in-house software. Specific
filtering: the arrival time window at approximately full width half-maximum for
the peak (m/z) of interest was selected in Driftscope
and exported as a text file and imported into the in-house software. After filtering
(either broad or specific), baseline subtraction (max baseline corrected at 25% base peak
ion intensity, with a median filter setting between 2000 and 8000) and normalization to
total ion count were performed to account for variability in absolute signal intensity
between pixels.
Results and Discussion
A thin tissue section of mouse kidney was subjected to LESA TWIMS-MSI. Figure a shows the kidney section with the 1 × 1 mm pixel
grid overlaid. The major blood vessels are located toward the left side of the section at
the renal pelvis. The renal pelvis is the entry and exit point for the major renal artery
and vein, respectively. Figure b shows an arrival
time (tA) filtered ion image for
m/z 2894.7, the 11+ charge state of the
hemoglobin heterodimer (αβ2H). The unfiltered mass spectrum obtained
for pixel 48 reveals strong (αβ2H)11+ signals (Figure c), whereas the unfiltered mass spectrum of
pixel 42 (Figure d) exhibits weak signals. Figure shows ion images generated for the heme-bound
hemoglobin (Hb) tetramer (αβ2H)2 (15+, MW 63.7
kDa), heterodimer αβ2H (11+, MW 31.8 kDa), and
alpha-subunit monomer Hb (αH) (7+, MW 15.6 kDa). The images
reveal that these hemoglobin-related ions were most abundant near the large vascular
structures at the renal pelvis. The distributions of the monomer and dimer correlate
reasonably well, with signals detected across the tissue, whereas the tetramer is confined
to the renal pelvis vasculature. In part, this observation can be explained by the fact that
tetrameric Hb is known to dissociate to dimers following hemolysis, i.e., outside of red
blood cells, with subsequent clearance to the kidney.[26] Another factor is
the lower signal intensity of the tetramers. Three sets of ion images are shown: produced
using no ion mobility filtering, with a broad filtering rule, and with filtering specific to
the ion of interest. Broad filtering (see Figure S1, Supporting Information) involved selection of a protein-containing
region of interest from the 2D heat-map plot of arrival time versus
m/z. This selection rule was applied to all pixels
within the data set, and ion images were generated from the resulting mass spectra. Specific
filtering involved selection of an arrival time (tA) window set
approximately at the full width half-maximum of the arrival time peak of ions of interest,
followed by image generation for those ions. Additional ion images for small proteins are
shown in Figure S2, Supporting Information. The images are generally comparable in
appearance for all ion mobility filtering options; however, there are clear differences
between the images for m/z 4245 (Figure
g–i). The specific tA
filtering results in an image with the most intense signal where the blood vessel is seen on
the photograph of the kidney section, whereas this is not the case for the unfiltered
images. This observation suggests that a lack of arrival time specificity is detrimental to
the accuracy of the image. Arrival time filtered images for three charge states of each of
the Hb-related ions are shown in Figure S3, Supporting Information. In each case, the middle charge state
represents the most intense signal. Dimer ions exhibit comparable images for charge states
12+–10+. Images for the heme-bound α-monomer and
tetramer ions show consistency between the 7+, 6+ and 16+,
15+ charge states respectively, while the 8+ and 14+
charge state images suffer from low signal intensity and are visually less consistent.
Figure 2
Ion images for Hb αH 7+ monomer (a–c),
αβ2H 11+ dimer (d–f), and
(αβ2H)215+ tetramer (g–i) produced
without arrival time (tA) filtering (a,d,g), with a broad
selection rule that predominantly removed singly charged signals (b,e,h), and with a
specific tA selected for each ion of interest (c,f,i). Color
bars indicate normalized signal intensity after baseline subtraction.
Ion images for Hb αH 7+ monomer (a–c),
αβ2H 11+ dimer (d–f), and
(αβ2H)215+ tetramer (g–i) produced
without arrival time (tA) filtering (a,d,g), with a broad
selection rule that predominantly removed singly charged signals (b,e,h), and with a
specific tA selected for each ion of interest (c,f,i). Color
bars indicate normalized signal intensity after baseline subtraction.The use of specific arrival time (tA) filtering is especially
useful where protein ion signals are of low intensity or otherwise obscured by isobaric
signals. As an example, Figure shows how, with
specific tA filtering, peaks for β-thymosin 4 [M +
4H]4+ in pixel 34 are revealed from baseline signals and are thus incorporated
into the ion image once further processed. Without filtering, real ion signals were
subtracted as if they were part of the baseline, whereas tA
filtering improved the S/N prior to baseline subtraction. Figure S4, Supporting Information, shows an alternative situation, where
ubiquitin [M + 5H]5+ signal is apparently detected in pixel 32 for the unfiltered
image (Figure S4a), but the signal results from the noise.
tA filtering reduces the noise but does not reveal any peaks
attributable to ubiquitin ions, and as such, the reduced pixel intensity is reported in the
ion image (Figure S4d). It is important to note that some baseline signals may be
retained, i.e., tA filtering results in improved rather than
complete specificity.
Figure 3
Comparison of ion images for m/z 1241.65 ± 1
where (a) includes signals at all arrival times (tA),
whereas (d) is restricted to signals with tA between 5.4 and
8.2 ms. The raw spectrum for pixel 34 (b) shows low intensity peaks for β-thymosin
4 are lost within the baseline signals, but tA filtering
increases the S/N ratio (e). With baseline subtraction during image processing, real ion
signals within the baseline may be lost entirely (c). The increased S/N provided by
specific tA filtering in (e) improved detection of
β-thymosin signals in pixel 34 (f). Color bars in (a) and (d) indicate normalized
intensity after baseline subtraction.
Comparison of ion images for m/z 1241.65 ± 1
where (a) includes signals at all arrival times (tA),
whereas (d) is restricted to signals with tA between 5.4 and
8.2 ms. The raw spectrum for pixel 34 (b) shows low intensity peaks for β-thymosin
4 are lost within the baseline signals, but tA filtering
increases the S/N ratio (e). With baseline subtraction during image processing, real ion
signals within the baseline may be lost entirely (c). The increased S/N provided by
specific tA filtering in (e) improved detection of
β-thymosin signals in pixel 34 (f). Color bars in (a) and (d) indicate normalized
intensity after baseline subtraction.Figure a shows the mass spectrum obtained from
pixel 48. Peaks corresponding to heme-coordinated hemoglobin ion signals, including the
tetramer Hb (αβ2H)2, heterodimer Hb
(αβ2H), and alpha-subunit monomer Hb (αH), are
detected. The narrow charge state envelopes and presence of protein complex ions is
characteristic of native analysis conditions. Arrival time distribution (ATD) plots obtained
at three wave heights are shown for
[(αβ2H)2]15+,
(αβ2H)10+, and (αH)7+ (see
Figure b–d, respectively). CCS values may
be obtained at a single traveling wave height, but information from three different wave
heights enables estimation of the measurement error. For each wave height, the same tissue
location was resampled (see Methods). The
TWCCSN2→N2 for the Hb tetramer was calculated for the
14+ (approximate m/z 4550, 4378 ± 89
Å2), 15+ (approximate m/z
4245, 4465 ± 41 Å2), and 16+ (approximate
m/z 3980, 4503 ± 33 Å2) charge
states. The CCSN2 of the Hb (αβ2H)2 crystal
structure (3HRW) calculated using the TM was 4699 Å2, up to 7% larger than
the experimentally determined TWCCSN2→N2 values. This
discrepancy indicates slightly compacted ions, explained by a degree of gas-phase compaction
of the tetramer as a consequence of the traveling wave height in the ion mobility device,
and has been noted previously.[9,27] A similar observation was made for human hemoglobin ions by Scarff et
al. with the suggestion that polar side chains collapse in the gas
phase.[8,28] The
TWCCSN2→N2 for Hb (αβ2H)2
ions is larger for higher charge states, as is often observed, due to Coulombic repulsion in
the gas phase.[29] The 16+ charge state also features a second
arrival time peak (see Figure S5, TWCCSN2→N2 = 4714 ± 44
Å2), suggesting that there was also a more unfolded conformation present.
Hemoglobin dimers, αβ2H, also exist naturally under physiological
conditions and have been observed in previous native MS studies of
hemoglobin.[26,30] The
presence of abundant dimer and monomer peaks may also be the result of natural dissociation
due to low Hb concentration in the extraction solution, occurring in the interval between
extraction and ionization.[31] Peaks corresponding to
αβ2H in the 10+ (TWCCSN2→N2
= 2810 ± 29 Å2), 11+
(TWCCSN2→N2 = 3030 ± 17 Å2), and
12+ (TWCCSN2→N2 = 3221 ± 40
Å2) charge states were detected. The 7+ charge state of
αH had a TWCCSN2→N2 of 1808 ± 19
Å2. An unidentified protein (∼14 561 Da) was detected at
m/z 2428 (6+,
TWCCSN2→N2 = 1637 ± 4 Å2),
m/z 2081 (7+,
TWCCSN2→N2 = 1705 ± 10 Å2), and
m/z 1821 (8+,
TWCCSN2→N2 = 1809 ± 10 Å2).
TWCCSN2→N2 for a further unidentified protein
(∼14 866 Da) was similarly determined (7+,
TWCCSN2→N2 = 1715 ± 10 Å2;
8+, 1791 ± 18 Å2). Ubiquitin (8560 Da (5+),
TWCCSN2→N2 = 1089 ± 17 Å2) was found to
have a comparable TWCCSN2→N2 to those reported in the
literature.[32,33]
β-thymosin 4 (4960 Da (4+), TWCCSN2→N2 = 796
± 9 Å2) was also detected—this is the first instance of its
TWCCSN2→N2 being reported, although the
TWCCSN2→He has been reported.[21] It is
important to note that as ion mobility measurements were performed in tandem with mass
analysis, no additional experiments were necessary for determination of
TWCCSN2→N2. As such, future native LESA MSI investigations
could study protein–protein and protein–ligand complexes with location
specificity on a single tissue section but without additional sample preparation or
instrument time required.
Figure 4
(a) Mass spectrum for pixel 48 after background subtraction (MassLynx function,
polynomial order 15, 10% below curve) with labels indicating the peaks for
heme-coordinated ions; hemoglobin tetramer (αβ2H)2,
heterodimer (αβ2H), and monomer (αH). Arrival
time distributions are shown for (b)
[(αβ2H)2]15+, (c)
[(αβ2H)]10+, and (d)
[αH]7+. Errors indicate one standard deviation above and
below the mean value of three measurements at TW heights of 24 (red), 25 (blue), and 26
V (black).
(a) Mass spectrum for pixel 48 after background subtraction (MassLynx function,
polynomial order 15, 10% below curve) with labels indicating the peaks for
heme-coordinated ions; hemoglobin tetramer (αβ2H)2,
heterodimer (αβ2H), and monomer (αH). Arrival
time distributions are shown for (b)
[(αβ2H)2]15+, (c)
[(αβ2H)]10+, and (d)
[αH]7+. Errors indicate one standard deviation above and
below the mean value of three measurements at TW heights of 24 (red), 25 (blue), and 26
V (black).
Conclusions
Mouse tissue was analyzed by contact LESA TWIMS-MSI under native conditions. The ability to
collect spatial, conformational, and mass information for intact proteins in a single
experiment allows protein structure to be associated with tissue features, e.g., the
vascular regions here. IM-MS measurements revealed that Hb was retained as a tetrameric
complex, among the other protein signals. The complex’s
TWCCSN2→N2 was found to be similar to that predicted from the
crystal structure. This finding demonstrates that room temperature native LESA sampling
retains delicate noncovalent interactions. Ion images showed Hb-related ions distributed
toward the renal pelvis, where the largest blood vessels are located. The ion mobility data
was also used to filter ion signals in the m/z dimension
by arrival time. Broad tA selection rules or specific
tA selection may be used to further improve specificity of ion
images, for example, by increasing signal-to-noise ratios for low intensity signals
otherwise lost in a noisy baseline.
Authors: David P Smith; Tom W Knapman; Iain Campuzano; Richard W Malham; Joshua T Berryman; Sheen E Radford; Alison E Ashcroft Journal: Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester) Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.067
Authors: Charlotte A Scarff; Vibhuti J Patel; Konstantinos Thalassinos; James H Scrivens Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Matthew C Chambers; Brendan Maclean; Robert Burke; Dario Amodei; Daniel L Ruderman; Steffen Neumann; Laurent Gatto; Bernd Fischer; Brian Pratt; Jarrett Egertson; Katherine Hoff; Darren Kessner; Natalie Tasman; Nicholas Shulman; Barbara Frewen; Tahmina A Baker; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Christopher Paulse; David Creasy; Lisa Flashner; Kian Kani; Chris Moulding; Sean L Seymour; Lydia M Nuwaysir; Brent Lefebvre; Frank Kuhlmann; Joe Roark; Paape Rainer; Suckau Detlev; Tina Hemenway; Andreas Huhmer; James Langridge; Brian Connolly; Trey Chadick; Krisztina Holly; Josh Eckels; Eric W Deutsch; Robert L Moritz; Jonathan E Katz; David B Agus; Michael MacCoss; David L Tabb; Parag Mallick Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Mark W Towers; Tamas Karancsi; Emrys A Jones; Steven D Pringle; Emmanuelle Claude Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Emilio S Rivera; Katerina V Djambazova; Elizabeth K Neumann; Richard M Caprioli; Jeffrey M Spraggins Journal: J Mass Spectrom Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 1.982
Authors: Manxi Yang; Hang Hu; Pei Su; Paul M Thomas; Jeannie M Camarillo; Joseph B Greer; Bryan P Early; Ryan T Fellers; Neil L Kelleher; Julia Laskin Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Carla Harkin; Karl W Smith; Faye L Cruickshank; C Logan Mackay; Bryn Flinders; Ron M A Heeren; Tara Moore; Simon Brockbank; Diego F Cobice Journal: Mass Spectrom Rev Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 9.011